Chris Hedges on capitalism's sacrifice zones: critical analysis

¶ … Chris Hedges made agreed disagreed agree/disagree. (150-word response). open link watch video: http://billmoyers./segment/chris-hedges -- capitalism's-'sacrifice-zones' / For questions's words response.

"It comes down to the necessity to speak a truth, or, at least a truth as far as you can discern it. […] I understood all the ways that this was going to be a disaster, including upsetting the power balance in the Middle East."

Chris Hedges' claim that the U.S. should not have been involved in the Iraq conflict is certainly intriguing. He risked his position in order to provide the masses with the opportunity to understand the wrongness of such a war. He was actually pushed out of the NY Times because of his strength of will, taking into account that he was well-acquainted with the fact that his position concerning the matter would generate much controversy and that it would influence many of his supporters to step back from relating to him as a person whom they like collaborating with.

Hedges' statement is inspiring because it emphasizes the importance of telling the truth even when one comes across a situation when it might prove harmful for him or her to take on such an attitude.

1. Momaday's discourse was meant to influence his listeners to acknowledge the importance of spiritual values and of the sacred so as for them to have a better understanding of the feelings experienced by a series of Native American tribes as they were chased away from their lands.

2. Momaday appealed to people's emotions with the purpose to influence them and actually succeeded in getting across a convincing message.

3. Momaday's concluding observation is very pertinent, as he wants people to understand the importance of preserving spiritual values.

1. Leslie Marmon Silko's interview is meant to promote her book and to provide viewers with the opportunity to gain a better understanding of the writer's connection to the natural world.

2. "When I settled up in the hills the most friendly beings were the rattle snakes, and the pack rats, and the…you know, the wild things, and the bees and the humming birds."

The fact that Silko uses rattle snakes and pack rats as examples of beings that she interacted with demonstrates that she wants to highlight how society tends to ignore the importance of the natural world. Wild things do not necessarily have to be regarded as being harmful and people need to know how to accept their friendship.