Appreciative Inquiry How Does Responsible Conduct Factor Essay

Length: 3 pages Sources: 5 Subject: Business - Management Type: Essay Paper: #82528859 Related Topics: Art Appreciation, Success, Energy
Excerpt from Essay :

Appreciative Inquiry

How does responsible conduct factor into the use of appreciative inquiry as a vehicle for organizational change? The four components of responsible conduct, which are individual attributes, organizational structure, organizational culture, and societal expectations, all contribute to the structure of an environment that is supportive of ethical conduct (Cooper, 2006). As an approach for organizational change, appreciative inquiry engages all of these components in order to achieve a process characterized by positive change. This change is based in perceptions and experiences characterized by factors such as achievements, assets, innovations, and elevated thoughts, to name a few (Cooperrider & Whitney, 2005).

Appreciative inquiry views organizational functioning from a holistic perspective, in which the whole organization defines the smaller individual parts, rather than the other way around (Hammond 1996). Rather than focusing on what is wrong or needs fixing with an organization, the concept underlying appreciative inquiry is to instead remain centered on what is working, and appreciative inquiry is a questioning process comprised of a series of statements that create a vision as to where an organization aims to be in the future based on moments in the past that have...


Individuals reflect on the past in order to recall and in a sense relive moments of success in the past that were energizing and take the essence of these moments to set goals and aims for the future with positive energy (Hammond, 1996).

Appreciative inquiry is a living process with no end because it is generative, where moments of success can repeat and multiply due to the fact that the individuals engaged in the process know how to create success because they have already done so in the past (Hammond, 1996). The change created through the process is not focused on getting to any particular result, instead the focus is on the actual changing, or the process as it is unfolding (Barrett, 2008). This process is experienced through a group of people coming together to share ideas, opinions, and past successful moments with the aim of tapping into a natural capacity for change and cooperation (Barrett & Fry, 2008). Appreciative inquiry brings attention and awareness to the generative potential of conversations focused around perceptions of success and positive energy (Barrett & Fry, 2008).

There are several distinctive characteristics associated with appreciative inquiry that enhance the capacity for cooperation experienced by those taking part in this organizational process, as outlined by Barrett & Fry (2008). Firstly, appreciative inquiry is based in the idea that all systems have strengths and primarily radiate well-being and health. This is opposed to the common practice to focus on lack, problems and disease when exploring change within a system. Therefore, appreciative inquiry uses deliberate positive approaches, such as focusing on assets, metaphors, and musings that carry an energy of potency and vitality (Barrett & Fry,…

Sources Used in Documents:


Barrett, F.J., Fry, R. (2008). Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Approach to Building Organizational Capacity. Taos Institute Publications. ISBN-13:978-0-7880-2163-3.

Cooper, T.L. (2006). The Responsible Administrator: An Approach to Ethics for the Administrative Role, 5th edition. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN-13:978-0-7879-7651-4.

Cooperrider, D.L., Whitney, D. (2005) Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Revolution in Change. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Hammond, S.A. (1996). The Thin Book of Appreciative Inquiry. Thin Book Publishing Co. ISBN 0-9665373-1-9-2.

Cite this Document:

"Appreciative Inquiry How Does Responsible Conduct Factor" (2012, March 14) Retrieved June 30, 2022, from

"Appreciative Inquiry How Does Responsible Conduct Factor" 14 March 2012. Web.30 June. 2022. <>

"Appreciative Inquiry How Does Responsible Conduct Factor", 14 March 2012, Accessed.30 June. 2022,

Related Documents
Special Education Director Leadership Styles
Words: 11099 Length: 40 Pages Topic: Leadership Paper #: 58281810

More importantly, our appreciative and participatory stance with our co-researchers has allowed us to witness and learn about the cutting edge of leadership work in such a way that is and feels qualitatively different from other research traditions we have used in the past, because it is built on valuing. Even though it is challenging at times (Ospina et al. 2002), our inquiry space is enhanced by our collaboration

Cloud Computing Will Be Discussed to Show
Words: 9986 Length: 26 Pages Topic: Education - Computers Paper #: 12816018

cloud computing will be discussed to show that the good outweighs the bad. Furthermore, it will be further discussed that the government is looking into using cloud computing because it will cut IT cost down and increase capabilities despite the fact people are concerned with security issues that this may bring to the public. In completing a dissertation, it is very hard to go through the challenges that it requires.

Ethics in Nanomedicine the Term
Words: 10726 Length: 40 Pages Topic: Transportation - Environmental Issues Paper #: 76858278

All these charters that have clearly defined the boundaries of what both the positive i.e. natural rights and negative i.e. The unjust exploitative rights of the people are and how no institution or research domains have the right or power to violate them (Dierkes, Hoffmann and Marz, 1996). Based on the above fact, we have to consider all the concerns related towards security of an individual as well as his

Carl Rogers Core Conditions for Therapy
Words: 3534 Length: 10 Pages Topic: Psychology Paper #: 98461918

Person-Centered Therapy Today A sign on the restaurant wall where I lunched today reads, "What you call psychotic behavior ... we call company policy." A joke, obviously, but it set me thinking about differences in the world today compared to the 1950s when Carl Rogers was developing person-centered therapy. Take a small thing like "multi-tasking," for example. In the 1950s a person who drove down an expressway at 70+ miles