Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
This is to say that the Milgram studies were snapshots of a very specific culture and time period, as Blass suggests, and that they may not represent the ultimate knowledge of the concepts of obedience and authority as many researchers and academics once thought (Berger, 2009). This interesting in that it suggests flexibility in these concepts and the way humans experience them in their everyday lives that extends through historical and other contexts.
Milgram's work is certainly groundbreaking and has helped to define how researchers and academics view the concepts of perception, obedience, and authority. Though his research is often criticized for other reasons, Milgram's work only represents a small piece of the larger picture of the innate human dynamics related to authority and obedience. Certainly these concepts are necessary for the functionality of everyday life as humans, but they are much more complex than Milgram's studies suggest. Contemporary...
(1964). "A Review of Stanley Milgram's experiments on obedience "American Psychologist 19, 421-423.
Blass, Thomas. (1999). "The Milgram Paradigm After 35 Years: Some Things We Now Know About Obedience to Authority." Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
Vol. 29, 955 -- 978.
Burger, Jerry M. (2009). "Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today?"
American Psychologist, Vol. 64, 1-11.
Milgram, Stanley. (1964). "Issues in the study of obedience: A reply to Baumrind." American Psychologist, 19, 448-452.
Milgram,…
Works Cited
Baumrind, Diana. (1964). "A Review of Stanley Milgram's experiments on obedience "American Psychologist 19, 421-423.
Blass, Thomas. (1999). "The Milgram Paradigm After 35 Years: Some Things We Now Know About Obedience to Authority." Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
Vol. 29, 955 -- 978.
Burger, Jerry M. (2009). "Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today?"
It was clear that destructive disobedience does create a stressful situation, as the participants knew they were doing harm by obeying these orders. Some participants even showed nervous laughter and uncontrollable seizures in 3 of the participants (Milgram 1963). In terms of how far they lasted in the study, the results were actually surprising. Thus, "upon the command of the experimenter, each of the 40 subjects went beyond the
' However, ill-tempered is a somewhat subjective judgment, given that the protestors of the civil rights era were likely to be judged as similarly 'ill tempered' by those who opposed African-American legal parity with whites. King's claim of lovingly breaking the law did not mean that he joyously accepted his punishment of jail time for exercising his rights in the segregated south: King may have embraced his punishment because of
Largely, Individuals Obey the Authority Determining the level of obedience to authority is an important practice because different jurisdictions have diverse considerations in the way they exercise their laws and other reinforcements. Individuals will naturally obey the law based on two primary factors, intrinsic or extrinsic rewards. This research will attempt to prove largely that individuals will naturally obey the authority. The study is structured into two main sections; firstly, a
classic Milgram studies on obedience were inspired by the Nurnberg trials of Nazi war criminals who consistently argued in their defense to their charges that they were just carrying out orders. In his original study Stanley Milgram (1963) had wanted to see if people would inflict pain to the point of serious injury or death as the result of being ordered to do so by authority figures. Milgram used
Parental authority is something Hobbes believes is based on a contract. Parents take care of children in exchange for the obedience of the child. Locke believes parental authority relies on biological inheritance and the natural rights bestowed on a parent to take care of a needy creature they bring into the world. He also states, children are bound by honor to obey the parent until they reach 'an age of
Managerialism in Advanced Industrial Societies According to Weber there are three options of structural power available to the entrepreneur in advanced industrial societies. These include the bureaucracy, charisma and tradition, or feudalism. These three options are discussed below in terms of organizations and elites, rationalization and bureaucratization, stratification, authority, and domination. Bureaucracy The bureaucratic option is also referred to as transactional in nature. Bureaucratization occurs as a result of knowledge. Rationalization in this option