Paper Example Doctorate 1,452 words

Why Is the Main Security Program at Airports Still Ineffective?

Last reviewed: August 21, 2015 ~8 min read

Aviation Security Since 911

How has aviation security improved since the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001? What do reliable sources in the literature say with reference to safety and security in 2015? And how effective is the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) at keeping air travelers safe? This paper covers those issues and in particular provides a number of good sources commenting on the quality (or lack of quality) displayed by the TSA employees.

Generalizations about aviation security in the Post-911 era

For most people who travel by air, the screening at the airports in 2015 is certainly more thorough than it was prior to 911, but there are continuing problems with TSA, as will be documented in this paper. But at the beginning of this paper it is worth reviewing the "Mission" of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in terms of what the U.S. Government wants the public to know: "Safety is our passion"; "Excellence is our promise"; "Integrity is our touchstone"; "People are our strength"; and "Innovation is our signature" (www.faa.gov). Has the FAA lived up to its Mission? That seems open to question. While it is true that although there have been terrorist ("lone wolf") acts on the ground; no terrorist acts have taken place on board U.S. commercial aircraft since 911. Is this because of the competency of the TSA? Or are there other reasons to explain why flying is safer since 911?

Since 911, what is the TSA doing to protect passengers in a professional way?

"More than a decade after 911, it is a national embarrassment that our airport security system remains so hopelessly bureaucratic and disconnected from the people whom it is meant to protect & #8230; to eliminate risk from flying, we have made air travel an unending nightmare for U.S. passengers…" (Kip Hawley, former head of TSA).

Why is Kip Hawley speaking out after his three-and-a-half year term as head of TSA? He basically admitted in a Wall Street Journal (WSJ) article (that is well referenced in a blog in www.techdirt.com) that the screening system is broken. Hawley also is quoted in the WSJ saying that the TSA's assigned job is to "manage risk" but "not to enforce regulations"; and he made that statement apparently because he believes that "regulations are always playing catch-up because terrorists design their plots around the loopholes" (www.techdirt.com).

Another critic is Jeff Price, author of the book Practical Aviation Security and founder of a consultancy called "Leading Edge Strategies." Price offers this assessment of TSA: "For airport security pre-911, the technology was 1970s. But post-911, it is the 1990s, but it is not yet in the 21st century" (www.flightglobal.com).

Protecting passengers may have become a second priority for the TSA, based on personal testimony from former employees. Protecting its image may be out on front of passengers, one can conclude after reading the available literature. For example, P. Jeffrey Black, a former U.S. Federal Air Marshal, was a whistleblower and asserted that some TSA officials were "above the law" (Jacobsen, 2008). The Homeland Security's Special Agent in charge of investigating Black (after he became a whistleblower), Charles Maurer, reportedly attempted to force a UPS store manager to allow him to see the private files of Black. Maurer told the UPS manager, "I don't need a subpoena, I have this badge. Now, get me the files" (Jacobsen, p. 1).

Another example of the TSA's heavy-handedness can be viewed through the experience of 62-year-old Annie McKeehan, who worked at four different east coast airports and witnessed "…security lapses, abuse of power and fiscal waste" (Jacobson, p. 1). McKeehan wrote a fictionalized book (detailing abuses and incompetence by TSA) and was a month from it being published when she was called in to face a TSA supervisor. She had written an email to a friend saying, "I have a plan," meaning a plan for her personal future.

When called in, her supervisor had printed out "I have a plan" on a sheet of paper and interrogated her as to what her plan was. "They had been monitoring my personal emails, the ones I'd sent from my home computer using a personal email account" (Jacobson, p. 1).

How many TSA employees have quit the agency?

Annie Jacobson writes that several agencies (including the U.S. House Judiciary Committee) had tried and failed to find out what the turnover rate was for TSA. The Government Accounting Office (GAO), a watchdog agency for the U.S. Congress, determined in 2005 that the Homeland Security Department (under which TSA serves) was losing employees at "twice the average for a Cabinet level agency," but no specific numbers were available (Jacobson, p. 2).

The truth of how many employees have come and gone is found in a blog, produced by TSA. According to "Christopher," the blogger, TSA has had "more than 110,000 employees." And at the time Christopher wrote that blog, TSA had a workforce of 43,000. Hence, the figure of 67,000 can be used when it comes to the number of employees that have left the agency (Jacobson, p. 2).

When looking at the average annual salary for TSA employees ($29,000 in 2008), it's no wonder so many leave the agency. Doing the math: If TSA was spending $40,000 to train each employee, and later trimmed that down to about $15,000 to $20,000 for training, that still adds up to a huge amount of waste. Figure $15,000 times 67,000 employees and you come up with "more than a billion dollars" that went into "thin air," according to former DHS inspector General Clark Kent Ervin (Jacobson, p. 2).

What kind of training to TSA employees go through?

According to U.S. Representative Marsha Blackburn, a Republican representing a district in Tennessee, that while TSA employees give the "appearance of federal law enforcement officers," they have neither the "authority nor the power" of law enforcement officers. The metal law enforcement badges and the uniforms are superficial and intended to give the TSA screeners more credibility. They have not received the training of "actual federal law enforcement…as is required of Federal Air Marshalls.

"If Transportation Security Officers are truly our nation's last line of defense in stopping an act of terrorism, then the TSA should immediately end the practice of placing hiring notices for positions on pizza boxes and at discount gas stations…" (Blackburn, 2012). Clearly, Blackburn is on the march against the apparent unprofessionalism of the TSA. She also attacked the idea that TSA employees are participating in "…searches and screenings at train stations, subways, ferry terminals and every other mass transit location around the country."

The report came out in 2012 that teams of transit inspectors (including TSA employees) had conducted "…9,300 unannounced checkpoints and other search operations," Blackburn pointed out. And she objects vigorously to the thought of "…federal employees with zero law enforcement training roaming across our nation's transportation infrastructure with the hope of randomly thwarting a domestic terrorist attack…" (p. 2).

You’re 83% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2015). Why Is the Main Security Program at Airports Still Ineffective?. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/why-is-the-main-security-program-at-airports-2152600

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.