Paper Example Undergraduate 1,407 words

Benefit Analysis Cost Benefit Analysis

Last reviewed: August 3, 2013 ~8 min read
Abstract

The proposal provides the cost-benefit analysis of the National Guard Armory project intended to be implemented by the Massachusetts State government. The report uses the net present value and the present value to evaluate the viability of the project. The findings reveal that benefits to be derived from the project outweigh the costs.

¶ … benefit Analysis

Cost benefit analysis is a systematic process of comparing and calculating costs and benefits of a project. The benefit of cost-benefit analysis is to determine the justification of a project in order to enhance a sound investment decision. The cost-benefit analysis also assists in comparing projects based on their expected costs and benefits and determines whether the benefits of a project outweigh the costs. Discounting is a technique to compare the present value of a project against the benefits received in different periods in a project lifecycle. (Richard, Zerbe, & Joseph 2010).

Objective of this report is to use a cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the proposed project of National Guard Armory of the State of Massachusetts.

Project Overview

The State of Massachusetts attempts to replace the National Guard armory that is rapidly reaching its service life. According to the Department of Military Affairs, the special maintenance will be $275,000 annually while the rehabilitation of facility would cost $4,000,000, which would extend the armory's service life by 15 years. Based on the information provided, the report calculates the Discount Factor for each year using 4% discount rate for 15 years.

Calculation of Discount Factor of the Project

A discount factor calculates the value that a future sum of money will worth presently. The discount factor of each year of the project is as follows:

Year

Interest Rates

Discount Factor

0

4%

1

1

4%

0.9615

2

4%

0.9246

3

4%

0.8890

4

4%

0.8548

5

4%

0.8219

6

4%

0.7903

7

4%

0.7599

8

4%

0.7307

9

4%

0.7026

10

4%

0.6756

11

4%

0.6496

12

4%

0.6246

13

4%

0.6006

14

4%

0.5775

15

4%

0.5553

Calculation of the Annual Present Value Cost of Special Maintenance (15 years)

The paper calculates the annual present value costs of special maintenance of the project for 15 years to enhance greater understanding of the overall costs associated to the project. The total costs of special maintenance of the project for 15 years are $4,125,000 and the breakdown is as follows:

Year

Costs of Special Maintenance of Armory ($)

1

275,000

2

275,000

3

275,000

4

275,000

5

275,000

6

275,000

7

275,000

8

275,000

9

275,000

10

275,000

11

275,000

12

275,000

13

275,000

14

275,000

15

275,000

Total Costs of Special Maintenance for 15 years

=275,000x 15,

=$4,125,000

The costs of rehabilitation of the facility costs $4,000,000. Thus, the overall costs of the rehabilitation and maintenance of the project are as follows:

Total Costs to extend the life of the project for 15 years

Total Costs of Special Maintenance for 15 years

$4,125,000

Costs of the Rehabilitation

$4,000,000

Total Costs Invested

$8,125,000

However, the report estimates the potential delays that might occurs before completing the project. Perincherry and Wu (2012) develop a schedule delay cost model and reveal that one year of delay in a new construction project is equivalent of losing an average of 37 cents on every dollar invested in a project. Perincherry and Wu (2012) reveals that the six government constructions are estimated to costs approximately $6.0 Billion in 2011, which is an average of $1 billion per project. Due to the project delay, the estimated costs of the project are $7.5 Billion. The major factors leading to the increase in the costs of a project because of the delay is that there will be an increase in the costs of materials to be used for the project with the effect of inflation. (Richard, Zerbe, & Joseph 2010). Since the National Guard Armory project is a new project, the report will estimate that the Massachusetts will lose 37 cents on every dollar invested in the project in case the project is delayed for one year. Thus, this report assumes that the proposed project will be delayed for one year. The report will integrate the costs of delay in the final report of the costs-benefit analysis.

Calculating Discounted Benefits of Rehabilitating Armory

The report uses the discounting to calculate the benefits that the State Government is going to derive from the project. Discounting is a technique used to translate the costs and benefits of the present-day project values into the time value of money. The time value of money shows that present money worth more today than in the future because present money could be invested for profits. Typically, discounting provides an accurate way to assess the economic impact of a project.

To use a discounting to evaluate the costs and benefits of the National Guard Armory, the report analyzes the demand for the Massachusetts State National Guard Armory in the last three years. The Massachusetts government derives revenues from leasing and renting the National Guard Armory and people in the state derive the following benefits from renting and leasing the armory:

National Guard Armory serves as a safe event location for people at a great price,

The armory also assists in putting money back into the community,

The armory assists in generating money to maintain the armories for future events.

Thus, there is a general high demand for the use of the National Guard Armory. Some of the methods that the National Guard armory is in the regular use are as follows:

Graduations/Receptions

Classes/Seminars

Social and Youth Events

Antique Shows

Group Meetings

Rummage Sales

Sports

Dog/Cat Shows

Tournaments and competitions

Charity Events

Birthday Parties and Potlucks

With high demand for the National Guard Armory, the government of Massachusetts realizes $1.4 Million of rental fee retained revenue yearly. The historical revenue generated from the National Guard Armory in Massachusetts is as follows:

(U.S. Dollars)

FY2011

GAA

FY2012

GAA

FY2013

GAA

FY2013

Projected

FY2014

GAA

Historical Budget Levels

1,400,000

1,400,000

1,400,000

1,400,000

1,400,000

(Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 2012).

Based on the historical and projected revenue of the National Guard Armory, the Massachusetts States government will realize approximate $1,400,000 yearly within 15 years.

Projected revenue of the project in 15 years based on the demand for the armory is as follows:

Projected revenue =1,400,000 x 15

Projected revenue =$21,000,000

Thus, the future value (FV) of the project is $21,000,000.

Based on the information collected on the costs and revenues associated with the proposed project, the report evaluates the viability of the project using discounting technique.

Formula for discounting the project is as follows:

PV = FV x [1 + (1 + i) n]

To simplify the calculation, the report substitutes the discount factor of the project in Table 1 to arrive at the present value (PV) of the project with the formula revealed as follows:

PV = FV x [Discount Factor]

The report assumes that there will be a project delay for one year and the report integrates the costs of delay in the calculation. The detailed of the Net Present Value for National Guard Armory table is revealed below:

Net Present Value for National Guard Armory

Time

Estimated Yearly

Returns

Discount Factor

@ 4%

Formula

Net Present Value

Year 0

0

($8,125,000)

Year 1

1400000

0.9615

PV = $1,400,000 x [0.9615 ]

1346100

Year 2

1400000

0.9246

PV = $1,400,000 x [0.9246 ]

1294440

Year 3

1400000

0.889

PV = $1,400,000 x [0.889]

1244600

Year 4

1400000

0.8548

PV = $1,400,000 x [0.8548 ]

1196720

Year 5

1400000

0.8219

PV = $1,400,000 x [0.8219 ]

1150660

Year 6

1400000

0.7903

PV = $1,400,000 x [0.7903]

1106420

Year 7

1400000

0.7599

PV = $1,400,000 x [0.7599 ]

1063860

Year 8

1400000

0.7307

PV = $1,400,000 x [0.7307 ]

1022980

Year 9

1400000

0.7026

PV = $1400000x [ ]

983640

Year 10

1400000

0.6756

PV = $1,400,000 x [0.7026 ]

945840

Year 11

1400000

0.6496

PV = $1,400,000 x [0.6496 ]

909440

Year 12

1400000

0.6246

PV = $1,400,000 x [0.6246]

874440

Year 13

1400000

0.6006

PV = $1,400,000 x [0.6006]

840840

Year 14

1400000

0.5775

PV = $1,400,000 x [0.5775]

808500

Year 15

1400000

0.5553

PV = $1,400,000 x [0.5553 ]

777420

Present Value

$15,565,900

Net Present Value

=$15,565,900- $8,125,000

=$7,440,900

Estimation Costs of Delay

Since the report assumes that the project may be delayed for one year, the report estimates that State of Massachusetts will lose 37 cents on each dollar to be realized from the project. Thus, the costs of delay are as follows:

Costs of delay= 0.37 x $8,125,000

Costs of delay= $3,006,250

You’re 80% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
References
6 sources cited in this paper
  • Campbell, H. and Brown, R. (2003). Benefit-Cost Analysis: Financial and Economic Appraisal Using Spreadsheets. Cambridge University Press
  • Commonwealth of Massachusetts (2013). Budget Detail: 8700-1140 - Armory Rental Fee Retained Revenue. State Government of Massachusetts.
  • Heyvaert, A.C. Mihevc, T. Thomas, J. et al.(2009). Evaluating an Approach for Cost-Benefit Analysis of Project Alternatives. Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis.
  • Perincherry, V. & Wu, F. (2012).Cost of Project Delays An Estimate of Foregone Benefits and Other Costs Related to Schedule Delays of Inland Waterway Projects. Decision Economics.
  • Richard, O. Zerbe,J. & Joseph C. (2010). Principles and Guidelines for Evaluating Federal
  • Water Projects. USA.
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2013). Benefit Analysis Cost Benefit Analysis. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/benefit-analysis-cost-benefit-analysis-93941

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.