This journal examines the biomedical model of health and disease through the lens of WHO definitions and holistic wellness perspectives. The analysis contrasts health as complete physical, mental, and social well-being against disease as homeostatic disruption. The paper critically evaluates potential biases in biomedical approaches and argues for more integrated healthcare models that account for social, psychological, and environmental factors.
Health and disease are two concepts in medicine and human biology that represent opposite ends of the wellness spectrum. My definition of health lines up with that of the World Health Organization, which describes health as the absence of disease and as a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being. This holistic view suggests that the nature of health is more than just the status of physical body; it includes psychological and social dimensions as well (Kalariya et al., 2023). Health, in this sense, is an ever-changing state of equilibrium or homeostasis, where the body\\\\\\\'s systems function optimally within a constantly changing environment.
Disease can be defined as a disruption or imbalance in this state of homeostasis, characterized by identifiable signs and symptoms. It is a condition that impairs normal functioning and is typically associated with specific causes and observable physical or biochemical changes. Diseases can be acute or chronic, and they may be caused by external factors such as pathogens or internal dysfunctions such as autoimmune disorders. This definition aligns with the biomedical model, which views disease primarily in terms of biological factors (Longino, 2020).
Reflecting on these definitions, I see a potential bias in the emphasis on the biomedical model in defining disease. This perspective may overlook the significant roles of social, psychological, and environmental factors in the etiology of diseases. For example, the increasing prevalence of lifestyle diseases shows the impact of factors like diet, exercise, and stress on health. Plus, my definition of health as a state of complete well-being might set an unrealistically high standard, potentially overlooking the ability of individuals with chronic conditions to experience a good quality of life. This reflection shows the importance of having a more integrated approach to health and diseases.
You’re 86% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.