Board Two Different Approaches Which Could Be

Board Two different approaches which could be used to examine the possibilities and alternatives include: the qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitative research is looking at other studies that were conducted. The basic idea is to identify the key trends and the impact it is having. In the case of Luke & Associates, the information will show the effects of rising costs on treatment options and the services that are provides. This helps everyone to identify key weaknesses and apply them to specific teams / organizations.

(Blaxter, 2010) Quantitative research is when a sample is collected of a various employees, administrators, patients and staff members. The conclusions will be correlated with the primary trends from previous studies using comparative analysis. This is when all facts are verified with the sample to improve accuracy. Anything that does not correlate is disregarded as an anomaly. In the case of costs and services, these techniques can identify the root causes of the problems impacting the organizations.

These insights can be utilized to offer a better understanding of how certain patterns are impacting stakeholders. This is when the organization is more capable of understanding and dealing with the root causes of the problem. (Blaxter, 2010) In a study that was conducted by Stringer (2007), he found that research requires using objectivity and examining different sources. This is used in conjunction with a sample to understand how it is influencing the facility. These results can be utilized by end users to comprehend the challenges impacting them.

This is the point they can start to deal with the root causes of the problem. Over the course of time, this will help everyone in realizing lower costs and improved quality. For Luke & Associates, this is building off of the basic core principles and competencies which the organization was founded. This is when they can move closer in realizing these larger ambitions. (Stringer, 2007) The biggest strengths with the Sandow and Allen (2005) article are the ability to connect with each person on a much deeper level.

This involves the management changing their focus and working with everyone to understand their value to the organization. Once this occurs, is the point the organization is more flexible to the challenges it faces from the economy, competitors and employees. In many ways, one could argue that this is the key for successfully addressing these problems and increasing productivity. (Sandow & Allen, 2005) The weaknesses of the study are Sandow and Allen is taking a one size fits all approach.

This is problematic, as the strategy will work well at Hewlett Packard and other technology companies. However, it ignores the issues impacting specific sectors and the strategy they are using. Over the course of time, this has the potential to appear as if it can make dramatic changes. When in reality, it will have a limited impact from failing to take these variables into account. (Sandow & Allen, 2005) A good example of this can be seen with chapter 4 (i.e. Look: Building the Picture).

It states that any kind of research must be able to maintain a sense of objectivity and demonstrate how something can be applied to a variety of conditions. This involves using the qualitative and quantitative methods. In this case, Sandow and Allen are providing a working protocol. Yet, it fails to look at how it can impact other organizations and firms who are trying a similar approach. This.