It is our clear understanding that this classification was not associated to the expect usage of the item. Indeed, whatever its aesthetic judgment on the object, the government will have been in a position to honestly determine that the object was intended for gallery observation much in the same fashion as would be any more convention sculpture or painting. The lack of connection in its intended usage and the classification foisted upon it for purposes of taxation denotes a clear inconsistency on the part of Customs. Here, Brancusi has been the victim of a customs agent who has appointed himself as a critic of art.
In Brancusi's case, there would be a perception that the piece was simply not good enough, traditional enough or representative of its supposed subject enough to be regarded as art. Naturally, there are no laws defining art which abide these subjective notions of qualification. But the greatest danger in allowing this to be imposed by customs officials is in placing into the hands of a government agency the capacity to make such terms for qualification....
The outcome would surely be a dangerous suppression of artistic expression. The flimsy reasons for denying Brancusi's work status as art could just as easily be applied to work reflecting resistant political views, unpopular philosophical impression or non-mainstream religious values. Any degree to which the reasons applied to Brancusi might be used in application to such examples of expression would be a denial of Constitutional First Amendment Rights and a subversion of art's purpose and possibilities. Ultimately, the court would decide in Brancusi's favor with the understanding that a failure to do so could result in a slippery slope that would render artistic expression uniform, conformist and robbed of its power to invoke debate, disagreement, resistance or independence.
Works Cited:
BBC. (2005). Sculpture Breaks Auction Record. BBC News. Online at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4516303.stm
Time Magazine. (1928). Art: Custom House Esthetes. CNN. Online at http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,928613,00.html
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION plays an important role in the doctrines of human liberty. However not every country grants this right to its citizens. There are many countries in the world where freedom of expression is still a contentious issue and which have been categorized by Freedom House as not being entirely free. The United States of America is one country where the constitution gives every American the freedom of speech
II. Three Important Factors: According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) freedom of expression is the: 1. "Foundation of self-fulfillment" 2. "It's vital to the attainment and advancement of knowledge; and 3. "It's necessary to our system of self-government giving the American people a 'checking function' against government access and corruption. III. Oppression of Individual Expression: China is a country that Americans would not be able to stay in for long without feeling
Freedom of Expression and Campus Speech Codes The article entitled "On Freedom of Expression and Campus Speech Codes" discussed the importance and utilization of the society and people's freedom of speech in educational institutions. The article provides a thorough analysis of how the imposition of speech codes on campuses and other educational institutions can be detrimental to the implementation and proliferation of the very symbol and important element of democracy,
It is not the responsibility of the press to look after the well being of others. The responsibility of the press is to report information in as honest and objective a manner possible and let the readers make their own informed decisions. One aspect to remember about these cases is that they were argued and decided in an age when the vast majority of news was published or broadcast after
The Positive and Negative Effects of Freedom of Expression within the Social Media in the U.K. Introduction In essence, social media in the UK provides an amazing platform for people to freely express their views, share information, and interact. Indeed, as McGoldrick (2013, p. 49) observes, “Facebook and other internet-based social networking sites (SNSs) have revolutionized modern communications.” Some of the most popular social media platforms in the country include, but that
Internet Censorship The internet came to prominence as a tool and pursuit of the masses starting in the early 1990's. The capabilities, depth and breadth of what the internet has to offer have increased exponentially over the ensuing two decades. Such expansion has greatly eased the spread of information (Palfrey, 2010). The ease in which people communicate and disseminate information has created a cause for concern among many different parties that