Bush\'s Presidential Judicial Appointments Web. Students Read

¶ … Bush's presidential judicial appointments Web. Students read Bush's appointments assess President made judicial appointments. Use http://www.usatoday./news/washington/2008-03-13-judges_N.

Bush's judicial appointments

There is much controversy concerning the George W. Bush Presidential administration and the judicial appointments it performed throughout its two terms. Bush's inauguration influenced a great deal of people to express fear with regard to how the new President would mainly focus on nominating conservative jurists. Bush apparently wanted to adopt a similar attitude to Reagan and even though he made fewer judicial appointments, he concentrated on appointing conservative jurists to lifetime posts, thus meaning that his actions would reflect on the American judicial system for decades consequent to his administration.

Bush's nomination of John G. Roberts Jr. was an effective move from the President, as he chose someone whom he knew Senate was likely to confirm. Furthermore, Bush intended to have power over the judiciary long after the end of his administration. It is very rare for a president to name a chief justice to a lifetime appointment and Bush was thus among the few American presidents who managed to extend their authority beyond their terms. Although Bush made fewer judicial appointments than Reagan and Clinton, the fact that he appointed Roberts means that he secured his position in the American legal system. Roberts' career is likely to expand over several decades to have one of the most long-lasting professions as a justice.

Samuel Alito is yet another conservative judge whom Bush appointed as a justice. In addition to him being a convinced conservative, Alito was also praised because of his impressive achievements through his career, taking into account that he served fifteen years as a federal appellate judge. The fact that he is fifty-seven years old further contributed to making it possible for Bush to reinforce his position in the American justice system. Both Alito and Roberts played an important role in emphasizing the fact that the president wanted to shape the justice system in accordance with his personal interests. Even with this, the fact that he appointed capable and prominent justices made it difficult and almost impossible for someone to criticize his nominations.

Janice Rogers Brown is probably one of the most controversial individuals whom Bush appointed as a justice. The justice has had a series of problems as a result of her ruthless attitudes in some situations and because she put across discriminatory behavior in several cases that she presided over. Brown has attempted to shape the justice system in accordance with her thinking in numerous occasions before being nominated as a justice. Even with this, Bush went through with his nomination and appointed her as a justice on account of her resolute mind, as he was obviously determined to have a justice who was ready to step in and express subjective thinking when it was required for her to do so.

Bush replicated Reagan's actions in many ways and his involvement in appointing lifetime justices actually reinforced Reagan's attempts to design a law system that would be in agreement with his thinking even after his terms ended. Senate Democrats attempted to affect Bush's nominations in a series of occasions, but this did not stop the former president from being able to shape the American justice system.