Butoh Dance Butoh Is a

butoh DANCE Butoh is a Japanese art form that emerged in 1959 as a response to western oppression. Western political dominance had a serious impact on aesthetic sense of dancer Tatsumi Hijikata who developed a new form of dance that comprises strange body movements, gestures and jerks. West was viewed as an oppressive force with technological and political dominance to effectively curtail powers rested in other nations.

The U.S.-Japan Mutual Defense Treaty of 1959-1960 is in many ways responsible for the creation of Ankoku Butoh that expressed deep resentment over western domination, power and authority (Klein, 1988). Butoh means ancient dance in Japanese and it is an intense and extremely rebellious avant-garde art form that was described by Bonnie Sue Stein as "shocking, provocative, physical, spiritual, erotic, grotesque, violent, cosmic, nihilistic, cathartic, [and] mysterious" (1986:111). Butoh is connected with other traditional Japanese arts such as noh and kabuki.

Butoh is an anti-traditional tradition seeking to erase the heavy imprint of Japan's strict society and offering unprecedented freedom of artistic expression... Nakajima said, "We found that we were making the same discoveries as noh actors made, using some of the same terminology, but we had never learned these forms."(Stein 1986:111) Butoh is now accepted as not only a dance but also as movement therapy.

There is no specific technique to follow because butoh appears a counter rhythmic art form where slightly abnormal aesthetic sense is applied to create strange tongue gestures, crouched movements, bodily jerks and sudden limb distortions. For this reason, butoh appears grotesque to the untrained mind. Combining German expressionism with Japanese Kabuki, butoh is seen as a dance form in which "violence, sexuality, horror, chaos, and bad taste are the expected norm" (Friedland 1993/1994: 94). Images produced by such performances may strike the viewer as outstanding.

Whether he appreciates them or not, the viewer will have to agree that he has never seen anything quite like this before. Stein (1986) speaks of Ohno, a performer in his eighties, who has mastered this art form: "He drapes himself across the edge of the stage in the serpentine curves of traditional femininity, then kicks his foot high like a carefree young lover. To the slow koto music, he skips, flutters, and poses" (Stein 1986:107).

There is something deathly about this form of dance as it combines Japan's traditional shamanic rituals, satanic mythology and folk theatre traditions to rebel against oppression. But butoh doesn't only rebel against political domination of the west; it also rebels against tradition, even traditional aestheticism. It defies all definitions of dance as Feldman (2000) observes: There is often no music, movement is rarely rhythmical, and artists sometimes remain with their feet planted for long periods of time. Look in a Japanese dictionary, however, and the word "butoh " is translated as dance.

Ask a Japanese performing artist, and they will tell you that butoh is dance. Go to a performance, and you will see an art form that looks like dance. It is neither sensible nor interesting to conclude that since butoh does not conform to Mr. Webster's definition of dance, there is no dance in Japan. For those who are interested in the art form called "dance, " it would be much more illuminating to observe Japanese butoh and think about how it challenges and complexifies their idea of dance.

(p.7) Butoh was inspired by German Expressionism movement that started in 1910 and was reflected in painting, films and other art forms. Expressionism was defined as a movement that focused on intense abstract depiction of an artist's passion and his true inner reactions to situations. This challenged the tradition model that instructed artists to capture the natural mental and physical state of persons and things.

Abstract was the keyword here since in butoh and Artaud's theatre, it was this abstract depiction of passion that indicated their close association with German expressionist movement. Butoh was based on the deconstruction theory that was effectively employed by postmodernist Antonin Artaud in his avant-garde theatre of 1960s. According to Jacques Derrida, deconstruction was a rebellious system that opposed structural norms and traditions.

It arose as a reaction to bias and prejudice as he explained: Deconstruction does not consist in passing from one concept to another, but in overturning and displacing a conceptual order, as well as the non-conceptual order with which the conceptual order is articulated. (Derrida 1982: 329) Artaud exerted significant influence on Butoh since his theatre incorporated what butoh later adopted i.e. rebellion and an acceptance of the unknown. His approach to theatre was deconstructive in exactly the same way as Butoh was deconstructive where dance was concerned.

There is no music, no traditional dance rhythm or no aesthetically appealing body movements and yet butoh is a dance. There is no denying the fact that butoh is accepted as an art form around the world. It is closely connected with Artaud's theatre and it is thus important to understand how Artaud employed deconstruction in his work. Artaud's work can be defined in just one word 'anti-conformist'.

Defying all aesthetic and intellectual structures of his time, Artaud started a movement of deconstruction that had a profound impact on arts in Japan. Theatre and its Double created many Artaud clones who refused to believe in artistic constructs of the time and followed a tradition where the other side of reality was turned inside out to bring man in direct contact with danger, evil, darkness, death and fear. This is what Butoh was also incorporating and representing.

Artaud rejected the views, beliefs and values of the theatre of his time. He was not interested in projecting reality and sanity as they were accepted by the mainstream theatre-goers. For him, artistic skills represented the ability to fully embrace the unknown, the untried and the unseen. Artaud did not view insanity as a problem. Everything that treaded on the dangerous was found exciting as it opened a new medium of expression and challenged the classical traditions of Japanese theatre.

It was based Derrida's recursive concept of deconstruction where insanity was suddenly the new norm as Artaud argued: "Medical doctors are born enemies of delirium [...] whereas delirium, that is, protesting imagination, is the rule of reality." [Artaud, 1996: 57] Such beliefs marked his theater careers as they were incorporated in his work. For example in his radio play, to Have Done with the Judgment of God, an almost ordinary happening turns into a major story: representing the break between traditional and Artaudian thinking.

The connection between Artaud's theater and Hijikata's butoh dance movements can be best illustrated in Artaud's own words: Man is sick because he is badly constructed [...] When you will have made him a body without organs then you will have delivered him from all his automatic reactions and restored him to his true and immortal freedom.. Then you will teach him again to dance wrong side out as in the frenzy of dance halls and this wrong side will become his right side.

(Artaud, 1947/1988: 570-1) Limitations were thus unacceptable to Artaud in much the same way as it is unacceptable in Butoh. Everything that his work projected was also advanced by butoh dancers with their dangerous and almost diabolical dance movements.

This demonic power was viewed as a catalyst for change and provided the required creative drive to break free of limiting artistic constructs: If there is still something diabolical, and altogether damnable in our times, it is to linger artistically over forms, instead of being like those burnt at the stake, who gesture from their pyres.

(Artaud, 1964: 30) Derrida had aptly pointed out that Artaud's idea of expression was not aligned to traditional concept of a past and a present where every entity has a past and a future to look forward to. Artaud believed in disassociation of self so that "the expelled reality, the work, the excrement, the child" had no history, no previous record.

It was thus "in-ne [unborn] before birth." (Derrida: 1986: 86) This concept when applied to theatre meant that since man had no past before birth, similarly every dance movement, every story that theatre tells, every action of the performer need not have a precedent. Butoh thus reflects Artaud's views on deconstruction of artistic models: Impulse the body, turn it back to its bad essence.

Do not negate evil, take it up as a body element and destroy it afterwards, extract the trance and joy that helped constituting it, do not ingest them, but reject them so that the being will die of indigestion. (Artaud, 1996, 106) Postmodernism was a time when rebellion and not conformity was the norm. However the arts that emerged from this period were basically of temporary existence or meaning.

Their significance lied in the context of the period in which they were written and did not hold much promise as enduring movements for later eras. However in their temporary period of prominence, they held immense significance for the people as they reflected a changing thinking, creative restlessness and generally anarchic artistic impulse. Their primary aim was to destabilize existing orders and this is what they accomplished with arts forms such as butoh.

"Liminal entities are neither here nor there; they are betwixt and between the positions assigned and arrayed by law, custom, convention, and ceremonial" (Turner 1969, 94). Hijikata, the man responsible for creating Butoh, also upheld Artaudian views on life and humanity. Keeping in view the traditional Japanese thinking of a connection between nature and man, Hijikata incorporated it in butoh movements. However he focused more on nature's darker side believing that, "the dirty is beautiful and the beautiful is dirty, and [life] cycles between them forever" (Kurihara 1997, 38).

Hijikata, just like Artaud, forced the viewers to pay closer attention to the side of life that they had usually ignored. He believed that it is due to a break between man and the darker side of life that we suffered anxieties and lived in fear. The reason that we suffer from anxiety is that we are unable to live with our fears. Anxiety is something created by adults.

The dancer, through the butoh spirit, confronts the origins of his fears: a dance which crawls towards the bowel of the earth [...] There is no way that one can understand the nature of light if one never observes deeply the darkness. A proper understanding of both requires that both their inherent natures be understood (quoted in Viala and Masson-Sekine, 188). Butoh has come.