Cognitive Dissonance Attitude Change Social Psychology

One of the most fascinating concepts in this chapter is cognitive dissonance, the discomfort we feel when our behaviors contradict our attitudes . I found it particularly interesting how dissonance leads to attitude change—when we justify our actions to align with our beliefs. The textbook mentions that people resolve dissonance by either changing their behavior, adjusting their attitudes, or downplaying the inconsistency (Baron & Branscombe., 2017).

This concept reminds me of when I committed to a strict diet but gave in to a craving for fast food. Instead of admitting I was breaking my diet, I justified it by saying, “One cheat meal won’t hurt.” This is a good example of reducing dissonance.

I also see this play out in social issues. For example, people who engage in environmentally harmful behaviors may downplay the severity of climate change rather than change their actions. It makes me wonder—are we all guilty of dissonance without realizing it?

Another aspect of attitude formation is how social networks influence our beliefs. The text discusses instrumental conditioning, where we are rewarded for holding “acceptable” views. This means that the attitudes we develop are shaped by those around us because we receive social approval for holding them (Baron & Branscombe., 2017).

This made me reflect on how my own beliefs have changed. When I worked with people who were politically active, I noticed my views on certain topics shifting—mainly because I wanted to fit in. It’s interesting how attitudes are formed by our need for belonging.

This applies to modern issues like polarization on social media. People engage in “echo chambers,” where they only interact with others who reinforce their existing views. It would be interesting to see whether people can actively resist these social influences or if attitude shifts are inevitable when we change social circles.

One of the ideas from this chapter is how modern racism is more subtle but just as harmful. The textbook describes how prejudice today often manifests in indirect ways—like microaggressions or implicit bias—instead of as blatant discrimination (Baron & Branscombe., 2017).

This reminded me of a time when I overheard someone say, “You’re really articulate for someone from your background.” This may have been intended as a compliment, but it carries an assumption that people from certain backgrounds are expected to be stupid.

The chapter also shows that research on implicit bias in police decision-making determines how police see threats. The fact that these biases operate unconsciously raises an important question: How can we change something we aren’t even aware of? I would love to learn more about strategies to reduce implicit bias.

The textbook explains that stereotypes persist because they serve cognitive functions, such as simplifying the social world. It was interesting to learn that even positive stereotypes, such as “women are nurturing,” can have negative consequences by reinforcing traditional gender roles, although I’m not sure why this is bad.

I have personally noticed this in workplace settings. For example, when leadership roles are discussed, men are often assumed to be “natural leaders,” while women are expected to take on supportive roles. But again this seems normal to me actually.

The text also discusses recategorization as a way to reduce stereotypes, where people learn to see others as part of a shared group rather than as “outsiders.” I guess it’s easy to rely on stereotypes without realizing it, but by interacting with different people, we can challenge our own preconceived notions. I would like to explore more research on how people can actively unlearn stereotypes.

Baron, R. A. & Branscombe, N. R. (2017). Social psychology, 11/E. Aufl, Boston.

The Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) describes how people process persuasive messages through two routes: the central route (careful analysis of arguments) and the peripheral route (influenced by surface-level cues, such as speaker attractiveness)

A political campaign ad featuring a celebrity endorsing a candidate, even though they have no political expertise.

Source: https://th.bing.com/th/id/R.523d4c109d9f18441608fec2bbf330c5?rik=pUY9JVzXeGq9eg&riu=http%3a%2f%2fgo.rappler.com%2fimages%2fCelebrity-endorsement-20130506-rappler.jpg&ehk=NBRM7ECDdAhQcqX4JLi4mOv0uq6skA3W4evpxnx4wCw%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0