¶ … Corporation Establish an Effective Compliance Policy Over the last several years, the issue of corporate compliance has been increasingly brought to the forefront. Part of the reason for this, is because a number of high profile scandals have occurred, highlighting the need for increased corporate compliance. As a result, a variety of...
Introduction So, you’ve made it to the end—now what? Writing an effective conclusion is one of the most important aspects of essay writing. The reason is that a conclusion does a lot of things all at once: It ties together the main ideas of the essay Reiterates the thesis without...
¶ … Corporation Establish an Effective Compliance Policy Over the last several years, the issue of corporate compliance has been increasingly brought to the forefront. Part of the reason for this, is because a number of high profile scandals have occurred, highlighting the need for increased corporate compliance. As a result, a variety of court cases along with legislative actions has increased the overall responsibility that: the board of directors and corporations has over employees.
A good example of this can be seen with the Delaware Supreme Court case in re Caremark Inc. Derivative Litigation. This is where the court found that: corporations and the board of directors are responsible for the activities of their employees.
With the court saying, "(to) satisfy their obligation to be reasonably informed concerning the corporation, without assuring themselves that information and reporting systems exist in the organization that are reasonably designed to provide to senior management and to the board itself timely, accurate information sufficient to allow management and the board, each within its scope, to reach informed judgments concerning both the corporation's compliance with law and its business performance." (Walker, n.d.) This is important, because it shows how the board has a direct responsibility of being informed of the company's activities (especially those involving their employees).
To improve compliance, the court recommended that the principals of federal sentencing guidelines should be implemented in any fulfillment policy.
Where, the court would observe, "Any rational person attempting in good faith to meet an organizational governance responsibility would be bound to take into account this development and the enhanced penalties and the opportunities for reduced sanctions that it offers." (Walker, n.d.) This is significant, because it highlights how the overall role of compliance has evolved to the point, that the different standards of federal sentencing guidelines should be applied to their policy.
At the same time, it is holding corporations and their boards of directors to a higher standard (by ensuring that federal sentencing guidelines could apply to the company itself). Where, the board and the corporation face the possibility of indictment, based upon their inability to supervise the actions of employees. The Seven Elements of Federal Sentencing Guidelines In 1991, Congress established federal sentencing guidelines. The idea was to provide judges with number of different factors that they should consider, when sentencing a corporation or individuals associated within an organization.
This would have an effect on many businesses, by pushing them to create different ethics and compliance policies. As it would outline seven different basic principles to include: the establishment / maintenance of compliance standards / procedures, oversight, the delegation of authority, effective communication standards / procedures, auditing / monitoring, enforcement of disciplinary procedures and an effective response after various breaches of the policy have been detected. (Izraeli, 2010) The establishment / maintenance of compliance standards and procedures are when the company is creating as well as continually adapting their compliance policy to the business.
This is important, because it will serve as basic guideline, outlining what activities are most acceptable in the workplace. (Izraeli, 2010) Oversight is when the corporation is ensuring effective supervision of employees and executives through: the different managers as well as the board of directors. This is important, because it is establishing a system of checks and balances inside the organization.
(Izraeli, 2010) ("The Principals of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations," n.d.) The delegation of authority is when managers and the board are watchful of the actions of those individuals (who have increased amounts of influence). This is important, because it places special emphasis on monitoring those people, who are given extraordinary powers within the company. Effective communication standards / procedures are when the corporation maintains and is building communication at all levels. This is accomplished by having various procedures in place, to ensure that the company is maintaining these high levels.
(Izraeli, 2010) Auditing / monitoring are when you are establishing various mechanisms that will ensure compliance (such as: an anonymous hotline). This is important, because the different tools that are in place, will report when such violations that are occurring. (Izraeli, 2010) The enforcement of discipline is when you are ensuring that anyone who violates the policy will be held accountable for their actions (regardless of their status in the company).
This is important because, it will make certain that everyone is following the various compliance procedures (by allowing no one to be above the basic guidelines). (Izraeli, 2010) An effective response of various breaches that have occurred is when the company will apply the possible infractions of the policy on a case by case basis. Where, they will take less severe.
The remaining sections cover Conclusions. Subscribe for $1 to unlock the full paper, plus 130,000+ paper examples and the PaperDue AI writing assistant — all included.
Always verify citation format against your institution's current style guide.