Essay Doctorate 2,644 words

South Korea Market Analysis Subscribers Political Variables

Last reviewed: April 28, 2012 ~14 min read
Abstract

In this paper, we conduct a country attractiveness report. The basis of this country attractiveness report is to identify the most suitable target market to launch an internet service provide (ISP) company. The two countries within our scope are South Korea and Singapore. In this report we evaluate the level of attractiveness on the basis of political variables, economic variables, socio-cultural variables. This report includes an analysis of the suitability of the selected markets via an exploration of the already existing broadband markets as well as information that is required for the market entry

South Korea

Market analysis

Subscribers

Political variables

Economic variables

Socio-cultural variables

Observations

Singapore

Market analysis

Political

Economic variables

Socio-cultural variables

The basis of this country attractiveness report is to identify the most suitable target market to launch a sea food enterprise. The two countries within our scope are South Korea and Singapore. In this report we evaluate the level of attractiveness on the basis of political variables, economic variables, and socio-cultural variables. This report includes an analysis of the suitability of the selected markets via an exploration of the already existing seafood market as well as information that is required for the market entry.

Introduction

The basis of this country attractiveness report is to identify the most suitable target market to launch an sea food enterprise. The two countries within our scope are South Korea and Singapore. In this report we evaluate the level of attractiveness on the basis of political variables, economic variables, socio-cultural variables. This report includes an analysis of the suitability of the selected markets via an exploration of the already existing seafood market as well as information that is required for the market entry.

South Korea

At the moment, South Korea imports over 70% of its food (Gillman, 2007). Several factors like an ever growing population, changes in consumer demand for a healthier meals, increasing wealth, lower prices as well as convenience are noted to have contributed to an ever increasing and heavily dependent upon food imports. The level of food imports to South Korea is noted to have grown rapidly since the 1990s. South Korea's food sector is increasingly exhibiting trends common in the developed economies. These trends include attractive marketing, convenience as well as other attributes. Processed food, animal products and beverages are noted to be becoming an integral element of the country's food consumption.

The South Korean retail sector

A review of the South Korean retail sector is noted to be experiencing a dramatic evolution ever since the very first hypermarket was opened in 1993. The liberalization of the nation's large scale retail business since 1996 to foreign ownership is another factor for the fast evolution of the retail market. The modern day large scale retail businesses like hypermarket chains, convenience stores, grocery supermarkets as well as online retailers have grown so fast an surprised the growth of the traditional retail outlets like the family owned ones over the years. The expansion of the retail channels when coupled with the use of new information technologies have transformed the way the Koreans purchase their consumer products.

The global financial crisis had an effect on Korea between 2008 and 2009. This resulted in a slowdown in the retail sector. The economic slowdown took a great tool on the traditional traders but provided an opportunity for the modern format players like hypermarkets to further expand their dominance. Korea has a seafood trade deficit. The imports are exceeded by the exports as a result of the nation's continued depletion of resources (USDA,2011).

The South Korean seafood market

The Korean seafood market is noted by ASDA (2011) to be outstanding and is posed to growth with time. The domestic supply of seafood is decreasing as a result of the depletion of most of the near sea fishery resources as well as restrictions on the concept of international deep sea fishing. South Korea is noted to be a major market for sea food in the greater Asian region (Smith, Dennis, and Proctor,2006).The South Korean seafood market offers a great investment opportunity in the long-term. This is supported by the strong economic growth which is expected in the nation coupled with a strong demand for seafood. Most of these are associated with the nation's high level of economic growth as well as increases in the level of disposable income (Smith, Brown and McKelvie, 1992)

Market analysis

Rabobank (2006) noted that South Koreans form one of the world's largest consumers and lovers of seafood products. For instance in 2002, the per capita seafood consumption was at around 45.5 kg while the average expenditure of an urban household on seafood products was estimated to be around $372. In South Korea, the most popular species are squid, Alaskan Pollack, yellow corniva as well as hair tail. The South Korean seafood market is a multi-billion dollar industry and is the 3rd largest in Asia. Irrespective of state of the South Korean economy, the level of consumption of seafood is predicted to increase at the very expense of other animal products.

It is widely expected that the nation's fishery production will continue experiencing a decline over the next couple of years due to overfishing. The South Korean government in reaction has accelerated the process of downsizing the nation's fishing fleet with plans underway to further reduce it over the next couple of years. This is noted to be in addition to close to 14.7% decline in the level of total capacity that was experienced in the 2001-2003 period.

Key players

Most of the key players in the South Korean seafood industry are companies, grocery stores as well as wet market sellers.

Political variables

Government regulation

The South Korean seafood market is heavily regulated. The Korean Ministry of Health and Social Affairs and the Korean Fishery Inspection Authority have placed several benchmarks that must be met by companies that deal with seafood. They also have strict quality assurance laws that dictate standards to be used for bacteria count, radioactivity, mercury, lead as well as the level of oxytracyclene in the case of farmed salmon. The Korean Government maintains very strict regulation on various food imports. The government also requires certain certifications on product labeling,

Import licensing

This is a quantitative restriction on the actual volume of imports of a certain fish/seafood category. This imposes a certain level of uncertainty on the exporters of the seafood products to the nation. The general lack of assurance on the level of access to the market makes it difficult in establishing a reliable seafood establishment. Under this import licensing scheme, there is a need to get prior approval from the South Korean Ministry of Fisheries.

Tariffs

The South Korean government applies tariffs on imported seafood products. These tariffs are very high as compared to the standards of most countries in that region. The tariff rate which is applied to most fisheries imports is 20% percent ad valorem even though for the prepared and preserved seafood like canned mollusks and crustaceans, the rate is 30% . The high tariff generally reduces the attractiveness of the South Korean seafood market.

Trade agreements

The lifting of various imports barriers like high import tariffs, bilateral phytosanitary agreement and import tariff, and import volume quota has lead to a change in the nation's competition structure. These can allow for easier importation of fresh seafood to be sold in the South Korean territory.

Ban on certain fishing activities

Due to the rapid depletion of sea resources, the domestic supply of seafood is decreasing as a result of the depletion of most of the near sea fishery resources as well as restrictions on the concept of international deep sea fishing. The government therefore banned certain fishing practices

Economic variables

The South Korean economy has seen a considerable level of growth since the 1997 Asian Financial crisis. The country's GDP stands a $1.01 Trillion and is projected by OECD (2012) to be poised for a 4.25% growth in 2013.A strong GDP is good since it encourage consumer and raises the level of consumer spending index. The GDP has seen a considerable reduction in 2012.It is therefore worth waiting to see what 2013 and beyond will offer before launching a product into this market

Socio-cultural variables

The average monthly expenditure of a South Korean urban household on fishery product by 2005 was $35.

Koreans are noted to prefer live fish to the fresh ones. They also prefer fresh fish to the frozen ones. They also believe that the fresh fish tastes better that the frozen ones even after being cooked. This means that the price of fresh fish is quite higher than that of the frozen one. The demand of precooked, preserved and prepared food has been on the rise due to the increasing number of women in the workforce.

Koreans are very aware of food safety and healthy living. These ideas affect their consumption of seafood products. The Koreans appreciate the health benefits of seafood and their level of safety as compared to other animal product that are often drawn off shelves due to cases of diseases like mud cow disease and Avian flue for cow meat and chicken meat respectively.

Singapore

Singapore is an Asian nation with a population of 4.5 million.

Market analysis

The Singaporean seafood market is noted to be experiencing a rapid decline in size over the years with the level of per capita consumption reducing to 20.8 kg (2006) down from its 2001 value of 23.3 kg. A 7 kg reduction in per capita consumption is noted to have taken place since the 1990s (Sea Fish,2008). This situation is noted by industry experts to be as a result of a shortage in the level of supply of tropical fish as well as seafood products-preferred to other temperature water products.

Consumption data

The official consumption data shows that Singapore consumers actually consume close to 96,000 metric tones of seafood yearly. About 76% of this seafood supply is traded at auctions in Singapore with 88% of the supply being imported. This leaves a balance of 12% which is supplied by the nation's aquaculture industry. The aquaculture industry comprises of 6 land-based suppliers and 97 suppliers who are sea-based, These are involved in the production of prawns, fish, crustaceans as well as mollusks.

Production output

Singapore's seafood industry is valued at between £45 -£50 million per year. The level of production is increasing due to the government's promotion of the concept of developing offshore farms in order to increase the level of seafood supply as an integral part of its food security policy.

The seafood supply structure

There are close to 130 fish merchant in two ports who are licensed to operate in Singapore. Averagely, there are 3000-4000 buyers from processors, retailers as well as institutional operations like catering businesses who on a daily basis visits the wholesale markets at the two ports in order to attend fish and seafood auctions.

These markets are usually opened from 2am to 6am on all days except Monday when they are intentionally closed for cleaning and maintenance purposes.The fish and shellfish to the action are landed at Suroko and Jurong and then shipped to Singapore by air. They are also delivered from Malaysia and Thailand by road.

Nature of competition

Several large stores from supermarkets are noted to dominate the nation's sale of seafood. These large format stores are noted to compete with the wet markets for customers of fresh and chilled fish. They are also the main channels for the imported temperature subtropical shellfish and fish.

The nation's main retailers have become very powerful and have also adopted more sophistication in their operations. The seafood industry feed the nation's population. It also feed tens of millions of tourists who visit the nation yearly.

Dining is noted to be very popular in Singapore. Residents are noted to spend a lot o their mealtimes in foodservice outlets. These range from tiny hawker stalls to large and premium restaurants.

Spending in these outlets accounts for close to 60% of the total food-spend.An increase of 6% from the 1998 figure.

The Singapore food service industry is very large and is heavily segmented with about 4,500 enterprises which employ about 65,000 people.

Restaurants that exclude the fast food restaurants are about 1,270 in number. Close to 200 are premium restaurants that have a high demand for seafood. Most of these restaurants are noted to be single site operations that source their supplies from wholesalers who are involved in the daily delivery of fresh seafood. A very small number of franchised s4eafood exists.

The country has a large catering industry with more that 180 businesses having sales exceeding £180 million a year.The largest companies are; Singapore Food Industries, Select Catering Services, ISS-Catering, Kriston Food & Beverage and Thomson Catering

Political variables

Government regulation

The Singaporean government via the Agri-Food & Veterinary Authority

(AVA) is the regulated the import and as well as trade in fish and all shellfish products in Singapore. The authority also operates as well as regulates the two fishery ports in Singapore. They control the seafood market in the nation. Under the Wholesome Meat and Fish Act and its related rules and regulation, Singapore's seafood market is effectively regulated.

You’re 82% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2012). South Korea Market Analysis Subscribers Political Variables. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/south-korea-market-analysis-subscribers-79533

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.