Creation mythology and humanity's place within the animal kingdom
✍️ How to write this paper — guide & tools ▾
Creation Mythology and Man's Place Among He Animals: Surprising Intercultural Similarities
Every culture has some version of a creation myth that is inherent to its beliefs. Even science has its own explanations for creation, and these are in many respects as uncertain as many of the mythological explanations for the origins of the Universe, the Earth, and all of the features and organisms that inhabit it. In fact, despite the vast differences that exist in varying versions of the creation myth, certain similarities exist between different mythologies -- and can even be found in scientific explanations -- that warrant at least a modicum of comment and comparison. Man's place in the animal kingdom is one such similarity.
The Judeo-Christian Version
It is hard to imagine anyone growing up in Western civilization without having some knowledge of the story of Adam and Even in the Garden of Eden. It is probable that very few people, however, consciously think f this story as part of a creation myth. That is precisely what the first chapters of the Book of Genesis in the bible are concerned with, however -- an explanation of how the world came into being. In this version, the Old Testament God single-handedly and unilaterally creates order out of chaos, separating day from night, land from sea, and woman from man. There is a highly apparent and even explicit hierarchy in the order and manner in which things are created, and nowhere is this more apparent than in the Bible's treatment of the creation of the animals.
On each day of the six days of creation, the Old Testament describes God creating specific features and creatures in a very specific order. Man is the last creature to be created (with a great deal of debate surrounding the creation of woman), and yet he is placed in charge of naming and organizing the other animals. In this sense, Adam (the first man) is made like a God, with the singular task of naming -- and thus imparting identity to -- each of the animals. Though last n order of existence, then, Man is first in order of importance according to this version. This also means that man has more to lose; when Adam and Eve eat the fruit from the forbidden Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, they are banished from paradise and forced to endure far more arduous and laborious lives. Man is still higher than the animals, but this height has carried a great cost.
Similarities in Man's Position
Both the Greek and the Biblical creation myths leave a certain ambiguity concerning Man's relation to the animals. In the Biblical version of the creation, Man is seen as the culmination of a single consciousness's concerted efforts to create, and thus is paced in charge of the other animals, yet he eventually falls from grace and is banished from the bliss of paradise that other animals still inhabit. In the Greek version, different races of man have existed in generally deteriorating circumstances, much like the Biblical banishment from the paradise in the Garden of Eden suffered by Adam and Eve and subsequently all of mankind, but the cause and effect of creation is far less linear and planned. The relationship between Man and the animals in the Greek myth is at first difficult to perceive.
Even a surface examination of certain other portions of the Greek myths, however, reveal more similarities between this myth and the Biblical version of events. Mankind is, for the Greeks as well as in the Bible, a direct creation of the gods/God; there is no lineage or path of sexual reproduction to follow, as there is for the various levels of gods in the Greek pantheon. As they are named creations, whereas the bulk of the animal kingdom goes unreferenced, it is clear that mankind as at least one point in its favor as far as ranking goes. Man, and the previous races of mortals created by Zeus, is also a hunter and tamer of animals, and this has long been the case. This, too, suggests a certain superiority of Man over the animals. Yet the offspring of a union between a god and a human was almost always a demi-god, whereas the offspring of a god and an animal often became a full god or goddess in their own right. This, as well as Man's debased stature according to Hesiod's description, leaves the question as ambiguous as Adam and Eve's banishment.
Conclusion
Ultimately, most creation mythologies include some split form animals, with whom human beings were more intimately associated in a long past mythological era. In Greek myth, the progenitors of man took this intimacy to a sexual level; in the Bible, Adam and Eve live peacefully amongst the animals in a much closer fashion than we do today. These similarities raise certain questions about the possible true origins of mankind's culture.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.