Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
False Personas
In the case of Jesse Gullickson of Brown Country Minnesota, a clear example of the online use of false personas can be seen: Gullickson impersonated a professional wedding photographer through the creation of fake profiles in order to lure women and asks for nude pictures. The catfishing victim, Bobby Faerber provided police with evidence of what Gullickson was doing, and Gullickson was charged with criminal defamation and convicted (Raguse, 2019). In my opinion, the case was decided rightly, as Gullickson was clearly impersonating Faerber through an online false persona intending to use Faerbers good name, brand, and reputation to solicit women for his own personal benefit. Faerbers own reputation was hurt in the process, as his good name became tarnished by Gullicksons actions. The charge of criminal defamation made perfect sense, and the case was rightly decided.
In some cases, people may create false personas for legal reasons. For example, a law enforcement officer might create a false persona in order to infiltrate a criminal organization. However, even this can skirt the edge of the law, because officers could be engaging in entrapment in doing so. Nonetheless, by assuming a false identity, the officer can gain the trust of the criminals and collect evidence...…Court case Voltron v. Katz established that the Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination extend to certain "implicit" statements, or actions that can be construed as admitting guilt. This principle was later reaffirmed in the 1976 case Brown v. Mississippi, in which the Court found that a defendant's failure to respond to police questioning may not be used as evidence of guilt. These rulings make it clear that, in some cases, it may be a violation of a person's Fifth Amendment rights to try to expose a false persona. If the police attempt to question a defendant who is pretending to be someone else, and the defendant remains…
References
Raguse, L. (2019). Catfishing case lands in MN criminal courtroom. Retrieved from
https://www.kare11.com/article/news/crime/89-f1539048-4c03-4d07-9273-e6f35d0b8f29
Defamation in Business Law What is Defamation? Defamation is when a person's reputation or character is damaged (or injured) due to the false statements or actions of others. A defamatory statement can affect both a person as well as a corporation. This is a black spot on a person's good name. It tarnishes the reputation of a person and can leave it in tatters. It is more like an improper attack against
Defamation Business Ethics Case 3.5: Defamation and Change of Venue The National Enquirer is a tabloid newspaper and as such, makes its revenue primarily from printing stories regarding public figures that are not inherently supported by meaningful investigative journalism, professional ethics, protection of privacy or adherence to responsible fact-finding. This is demonstrated in the defamation and invasion-of-privacy case delineated here, where Shirley Jones has pressed charges against the widely popular publication for
Defamation The idea behind defamation law is very simple. If and when the reputation of an identifiable third person is lowered by the communication from one person to one or more person/persons and where the communicator has no legal defense it is called defamation. Balancing of the right of a person to protect his reputation with free speech is aimed at the formation of the defamation law. Defamation law is divided
Introduction There are many cases involving junior employees faking accusations against the senior employees around the world. The intention by the junior employees to do this is often dependent on the individual employees and their work environments. However, the impact of their slander is adverse as it can lead to the dismissal of the top leaders (Kenyon, 2013). When CEOs are fired because of false accusations by the junior officers, the
Defamation & Anonymity The world of communications, both online and print, needs major over hauls in laws and teaching society to respect each other. Internet communications should be awarded the same protection, rights, and consequences as communications in print media. News organizations should not be singled out where anonymity is concerned. Printers are required to protect anonymity except if they are a news organization. It would be much easier for society