This paper focus on issues in criminal justice, specifically criminality. It examines the causes of criminal behavior. It addresses whether criminal behavior is stable over a lifetime, and the implications of this answer. It also looks at whether criminal propensity is heritable, and, if so, how that is known.
¶ … Causes Criminal Behavior?
There is a tremendous amount of debate over what causes criminal behavior. Some suggest that environmental factors cause criminal behavior, while other suggest that there are genetic factors that impact criminal propensity, and others even go so far as to argue that most criminality is a social construct used to control disadvantaged groups. Regardless of the individual perspective, few theorists suggest that a single factor is responsible for criminality, but urge people to consider a combination of factors when investigating criminal behavior. "Similar environments, for example, do not produce similar individuals; they create and highlight unique individual differences. Take, for example, two children living with abusive parents. Two issues that have been considered very important to modern researchers are the stability of criminal behavior and whether there is a genetic predisposition to criminality" (Wright et al., 2008). Understanding these two issues should help social scientists understand what changes need to be made to the criminal justice system and underlying social support systems to reduce criminal behavior, and, if that is not possible, to reduce the impact of criminal behavior on the non-criminal population.
Before looking at what makes people act like criminals, it is important to acknowledge that most people are potential situational criminals. People who would never consider stealing in a normal scenario might find themselves acting as thieves in order to feed a starving child. Likewise, people who consider themselves non-violent may find themselves engaging in assaults with exceptional provocation. These behaviors would still violate the societal norms that define criminal behavior, but they might be considered acceptable deviations from those norms. For example, though there are severe societal taboos against homicide, the use of deadly force in self-defense is such a well- accepted standard that it is part of the criminal law. However, these exceptional behaviors would be expected to be isolated incidents and to only occur in the face of extreme circumstances. Looking at criminality, one must look at those people who repeatedly engage in criminal behavior or engage in criminal behavior without any exceptional motivators.
Stability of Criminal Behavior over Time
Life course criminology studies have repeatedly verified the idea that a very limited percentage of a society's population is responsible for a great percentage of the crimes committed in that society. This suggests a high level of recidivism among those who commit crimes, which, in turn, suggests that criminal behavior will be somewhat stable over a person's lifetime. The criminal career approach envisions criminal behavior as an arc, with crimes increasing in severity and/or frequency and then tapering to a conclusion. Moreover, there is substantial evidence that juvenile delinquency does not generally result in adult criminal behavior. Therefore, it would be irresponsible to suggest that there is always stability of criminal behavior over time. However, criminal behavior does limit life choices, and those limits enhance the likelihood of future criminality. What seems clear is that while not all criminality is stable, those people who begin offending at relatively young ages are generally those who are lifelong offenders. In this way, it can be said that some criminality is stable over time.
The stability of criminal behavior can have a significant impact on criminal justice policy. When rehabilitation efforts proved largely unsuccessful, there was a conservative swing back towards incarceration to drive down crime rates. While incarceration does not have the blanket effect of reducing crime rates, it does reduce crime rates when high-rate offenders are incarcerated. "Moreover, the incarceration of high-rate offend-ers is cost-effective, meaning that the financial cost of keeping them locked up off-sets the costs of the crimes they would commit if free. The same cannot be said of locking up low-rate offenders" (Wright et al., 2008). There is the idea that understanding the stability of criminal behavior is critical to ensuring the cost-efficient and practical functioning of the modern criminal justice system.
Genetic Factors Associated with Criminal Propensity
One of the interesting things that researchers have uncovered is that there are genetic factors that are associated with criminal propensity. Individual traits are heritable, and some of these traits are associated with criminal propensity. This does not mean that people are born criminals, but genetic factors can affect how people respond to their environments. This has been demonstrated by scientific research revealing that "certain genotypes seem to be more, or less, at risk for criminality. Molecular studies have shown that specific genes are associated with traits linked to crime and offending, such as impulsivity, low self-control, and hyperactivity" (Wright et al., 2008).
You’re 82% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.