Critical Analysis War Is A Racket Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
676
Cite

Critical Analysis: War is a Racket Butler is correct: war is racket. He describes a racket as an operation that costs many but benefits a few—and that describes war well enough. Hundreds of thousands of lives are put on the line while a handful profit—investors, bankers, speculators and industrialists, for example, all of whom stood to make out like bandits from the Spanish-American war. Wars are invariably fought over some pretense: the Spanish-American War was launched because of an explosion on The Maine, which our yellow journalists quickly blamed on Spain, which allowed our leaders (who always have a cozy relationship with our bankers, speculators and industrialists) to go take the Philippines. In WWI, it was the Lusitania. In Vietnam, it was Gulf of Tonkin. In WWII, it was Pearl Harbor. For the current ME disaster, it was 9/11 and then the mobile weapons labs and phony evidence regarding yellow cake uranium, Assad gassing his own people, and so on. It never ends—and the same clique always profits, generation after generation, while tax payers foot the bill. During the Civil War, it was the clothing manufacturers who got a big contract from Uncle Sam and then proceeded to make clothes for the soldiers that literally dissolved in the rain. During the Great War, it was the bankers with their Liberty Bonds, which our soldiers were obliged to buy only to find that they couldn’t sell them back at cost but rather had to take a nice haircut on the bonds to the tune of 14-16%.

I don’t think Butler’s...

...

Consider the fact that Rumsfeld announced the Pentagon had lost more than a trillion dollars of funding that it simply could not account for—this on the day before 9/11. The racket continues—whether it’s shipping opium out of Afghanistan under the pretext of fighting the War on Terror, doling out fat contracts to the warfare state (i.e., Lockheed Martin, Boeing, et al.) for billion dollar flying jets that serve no purpose in an age of hypersonic missiles and missile defense shields like the kind being produced by Russia.
Soldiers pay the biggest part of the bill, however, because they are the ones digging the trenches, losing limbs (and sometimes their minds from PTSD), losing friends, and losing lives. They are the ones who get stiffed by the government when they buy the bankers’ Liberty Bonds. They are the ones wearing the cheap uniforms that dissolve. They are the ones who get sent around the world to places they really have no business being. Butler identified 18 government hospitals for veterans, treating 50,000 destroyed men, their lives shattered by war. The soldiers certainly pay the highest cost.

Butler may be a whistleblower but that does not make him a bad or unpatriotic American. We pledge allegiance to the flag—not to the bankers and Robber Barons and industrialists and speculators (and dual citizens) whose puppets in the U.S. government get us into foreign entanglements. Butler is swinging for America. It’s not fair to label…

Cite this Document:

"Critical Analysis War Is A Racket" (2018, October 09) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/critical-analysis-war-is-a-racket-essay-2172975

"Critical Analysis War Is A Racket" 09 October 2018. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/critical-analysis-war-is-a-racket-essay-2172975>

"Critical Analysis War Is A Racket", 09 October 2018, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/critical-analysis-war-is-a-racket-essay-2172975

Related Documents
Music & Skimmington Riots an
PAGES 25 WORDS 8558

In this regard, when wage levels fell in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, the standard of living for laborers and cottagers in England declined precipitously and they were compelled to use the majority of their cash, garden crops, and milk just to buy bread and clothing (Kulikoff 2000:19). Not surprisingly, many of these workers found it almost impossible in some cases to even survive, even with the

interventionism from the perspective of realism vs. idealism. Realism is defined in relationship to states' national interests whereas idealism is defined in relation to the UN's Responsibility to Protect doctrine -- a doctrine heavily influenced by Western rhetoric over the past decade. By addressing the question of interventionism from this standpoint, by way of a case study of Libya and Syria, a picture of the realistic implications of "humanitarian

He stated that, "I mean printed works produced ostensibly to give children spontaneous pleasure and not primarily to teach them, nor solely to make them good, nor to keep them profitably quiet." (Darton 1932/1982:1) So here the quest is for the capture and promotion of children's imagination through stories and fables that please as well as enlighten. There is always the fallout that once a child learns to love