Paper Example Masters 1,374 words

Critical review of The Value of Hawaii: knowing the past, shaping the future

Last reviewed: November 27, 2011 ~7 min read
Abstract

The review concerns the book "The Value of Hawaii" edited by Craig Howes and Jon Osorio. Three essays are highlighted in terms of their subject matter as representative of the basic paradigms covered in the book. The authors are united in their promotion of remembering the past to create a better future.

Value of Hawaii

Hawai'i is an island that has somewhat controversially and unusually entered its status as American state some 50 years ago. Indeed, many of the current economic and social problems currently experienced by the state have been ascribed to its difficult relationship with the United States and the circumstances surrounding its integration as a state of the country. In the book The Value of Hawaii: knowing the past, shaping the future, edited by Craig Howes and Jon Osorio (2010), the various authors offer highly divergent viewpoints of the problems facing Hawai'i, as well as potential solutions to these problems. What unites these authors is a basic understand that, to effectively function in the future, it is vital to remember the past and use its lessons; whether these indicate the need for change or the retention of previously effective ways of thought and management. Specifically, three of the essays seem to touch on important paradigms that should see change before Hawai'i as a state of the United States as well as an entity on its own can hope to find solutions to its myriad problems that are uniquely related to its nature as an island and as a culture. In this context, the essays by Jonathan Kay Kamakawiwo'ole Osorio, Sumner la Croix, and Ramsay Remigius Mahealani Taum offer questions and solutions regarding Hawaiian culture, its economy, and its tourist industry, promoting a sense of hope that the state can indeed resolve its problems and difficulties.

The essay by Jonathan Kay Kamakawiwo'ole Osorio is entitled "Hawaiian Issues" and focuses on the past nature of the state as a destination for Polynesian voyagers. He also briefly describes the state's development in terms of culture and rulership until it was taken as a state by the United States. The author seems to be very concerned with the effect of this integration, which he regards as both unfair and illegal.

The essay is not, however, a simple diatribe against the United States or even a call to action for Hawaiians to stand together and fight this integration. Although there is certainly a conceptual dichotomy between the descriptions of native, traditional Hawaiian culture and the way in which the United States as a whole operates, the author nonetheless suggests that Hawaiians simply remember the values upon which their culture is based, while calling upon corporations to integrate these into a common value system that would allow for the conservation of land. He also suggests that such integration would also mean the solution to a myriad social and economic problems such as the widening gap between the rich and poor, the current system of tourism, and the management of land. What is most striking about this essay is that the author focuses on the existing positive paradigms in the state and suggesting that those be used for future social reform, upon which economic and educational reform can also be built. To carry this further, Osorio considers in more detail the paradigm known as the Hawaiian movement. He also takes great pains to explain the separate agendas of the United States and its increasingly unrealistic professions about civil rights, equal opportunity, and respect for property. Instead, the Hawaiian movement has raised public awareness of how the initial takeover of the state and the subsequent ways in which its local citizens have been treated. This has had great impacts on the Hawaiian culture and the way in which culture is celebrated and experienced in the state. Thus, the root of the problem, according to Osorio, is the basic divide between the native, inclusive culture of the Hawai'i and the exclusive economically driven paradigms of the United States and its powerful corporations. Hence, the author believes that the Hawaiian movement can offer solutions by means of cultures learning from each other rather than dominating or subordinating each other.

Sumner La Croix's essay is entitled, simply, "The Economy." In somewhat less idealistic terms than Osorio, La Croix instead focuses on the precise infrastructure issues that the state faces in terms of its basic economic building blocks. The author sees two basic problematic issues that has driven the economic growth of the state down; these include education and the state's legal and regulatory framework.

In terms of education, the author addresses the way in which the education system functions at the basic level to achieve outcomes that are far below the economic needs growth of the state. School children receive a substandard education, for example, which results in poor job prospects and low university admission numbers. At the same time, those students that do graduate with University degrees, do not have work opportunities that offer compensation worthy of their qualifications. This situation is ascribed to a failure of education policies to encourage educators to provide students with the best opportunities to learn well. Moreover, the problem lies in the failure of policymakers to understand the underlying effects of policy changes, which are neither thoroughly discussed nor investigated.

The same is true, according to La Croix of Hawai'i's legal and regulatory framework, which, in many cases, is outdated and not reflective of the current economic and social realities in the state. One specifically important aspect is the lack of regulatory framework for the conservation and management of the state's many natural resources. In this, La Croix echoes Osorio, who notes the basic lack of land management resulting from a lack of understanding in how to manage such land. Whereas Osorio suggests that this would necessitate a paradigm of integrated work with the native community and U.S. policy makers, La Croix furthermore suggests that modern systems of regulation and management are vital to support such integration. Indeed, it is in the best interest of both Hawai'i and the United States as a whole that the longevity of land use in the state be promoted and prolonged.

According to Ramsay Remigius Mahealani Taum, tourism is a vital industry that supports the economy of Hawai'i. The author addresses this in his essay that is titled, aptly, "Tourism." The essay then focuses specifically upon how the tourist industry has affected and has been affected by the local culture and economy of the state. According to Taum, the current situation is somewhat dysfunctional as a result of a focus on state income rather than providing value to either tourists or the country's native inhabitants. Indeed, the author claims that, although the state's rich native culture is used as a major attracting factor for tourists, those who visit, as well as those who host the visitors, tend to experience a divide; where artificial and non-authentic cultural experiences are provided for the sole purpose of profit by the state and its corporations. Very little of this profit, however, is provided for the enhancement of the local culture or the ability of local business people to provide an authentic experience to tourists.

You’re 83% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2011). Critical review of The Value of Hawaii: knowing the past, shaping the future. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/value-of-hawaii-hawai-i-is-47932

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.