Satire and social criticism in Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest
This paper provides a critique of Oscar Wilde's "The Importance of Being Earnest." It gives a critical summary of the play and also examines the meaning of the comedy from the perspective of theme, characterization and plot. It explores the ideas contained with the very title of the play and shows how these connect to the text.
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
¶ … Being Earnest
A Critique of Wilde's the Importance of Being Earnest
First performed in 1895, Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest satirized manners and social customs of late Victorian England. Focusing on a pair of young men who live "double lives," the comedy brings to light an element of English society that was ripe for exposure. Wilde was a master satirist. With this play, he shows how cynical attitudes creep into one and before long lead to all sorts of problems. For Jack and Algernon, maintaining a phony second identity is the only way to lead a satisfying life. However, as the story unfolds, the two realize that true fulfillment can only be obtained through honest living. This paper will critique Wilde's Importance of Being Earnest and show the plot, themes, characters and title all work to give an "important" message to the audience.
Critical Summary
Otto Reinert (1956) states that The Importance of Being Earnest "merits attention both as satire and as drama" (p. 14). This double way of approaching the play is consistent with the "double" theme that is explored throughout it. Reinert states that Earnest works as both a satire and a drama because "the farce is meaningful" (p.14). It contains a "pattern of ironic inversion" (p. 14) that allows the comedy to be critically analyzed. Examples of ironic inversion run through it from beginning to end and come by way of every character whether major or minor. The butler Lane, for example, delivers one of the first examples of this "ironic inversion" when he explains why got married: it was the result "of a misunderstanding between myself and a young person" (Wilde, 2006, p. 404). The implication is that one marries quite by accident. It is not a contract one enters into willingly.
Yet, Lane does not suggest that marriage is in and of itself something bad. He states that he believes "it is a very pleasant" arrangement -- right before confessing that he, however, has only been married once and, therefore, lacks the necessary experience to really so for sure whether this is true. It is another example of ironic inversion. Lane, who is married, should be able to say whether marriage is good or bad -- especially since his marriage seems to have been a successful one and lasted. Yet, it is precisely because it has lasted and been successful that Lane gives off an air of cynicism. Rather than confess anything positive about marriage, he prefers to reflect his master's attitudes and issue a double meaning: on the one hand, he believes marriage to be quite nice; on the other, he cannot corroborate this belief with any evidence of his own (implying that his own marriage is not so nice). The audience is left to wonder whether Lane is only pretending to be dissatisfied in his marriage or whether he really is unhappy.
This "ironic inversion" is picked up by Jack and Algernon, both of whom feel the need to live double lives, sensing that English society will not allow them to have fun any other way. Yet, they also want what conventional society offers -- marriage. To achieve this aim, they must come clean and cease living the "double" life.
Yet, happily, the false identity turns out to be a "real" identity for Jack. It is revealed that he is Algernon's long-lost elder brother, named after his grandfather Ernest. This happy revelation solves a number of problems. Gwendolen is pleased because she loves the name Ernest (and is not quite so fond of "Jack"), and Lady Bracknell now gives her consent for Jack/Ernest to marry Gwendolen. As a result, Algernon is allowed to marry Cecily.
It is overall a very light-hearted affair, but the very light-heartedness of it all helps to supply the meaning of the drama the Reinert identifies in the play. The meaning is that triviality and seriousness should balance one another out -- that one should never be too trivial or too serious about anything. This message is solidly conveyed in the final lines of the play: Lady Bracknell says to Jack/Ernest: "My nephew, you seem to be displaying signs of triviality." Jack responds: "On the contrary, Aunt Augusta, I've now realized for the first time in my life the vital importance of being earnest" (Wilde, p. 471).
Characterization vs. Plot
Characterization and plot and both key to the working of the play. The play is driven by characters which undergo transformations. It is also driven by a plot that has a beginning, middle and an end. The characters must overcome conflicts within their individual situations, and the overall story must resolve conflicts that arise independent of the characters' actions (Foster, 1956, p. 19).
For example, Algernon wants to know what his friend Jack/Ernest is hiding in the countryside. He resolves to meet this pretty ward Cecily. To do so he pretends to be Jack's "friend" Ernest. Cecily falls in love with him. But complications arise when Jack/Ernest returns to the countryside and resolves to be "earnest" rather than "Ernest." He announces that "Ernest" is dead -- but this is problematic for Algernon who is pretending to be "Ernest" at that same moment. Then Gwendolen arives, and she tells Cecily that she is engaged to Ernest. Cecily thinks Gwendolen means Algernon. The two fall out with one another. The only thing that can resolve this sudden problem is the truth. Jack and Algernon must come clean.
All of the characters are trivial in a way. Gwendolen insists that she can only love a man named "Ernest." Lady Bracknell insists that she could never allow an orphan to marry Gwendolen. Algernon is obsessed with appetite (he eats all the cucumber sandwiches in the very first scene). And both Jack and Algernon play at being "Ernest" in order to hide a side of themselves.
At the same time, there is a seriousness about them all too. Lady Bracknell's stance with regards to Gwendolen's marriage is firm. She will not budge on the matter -- and even if there is something shallow in her stance, it is to be respected. Likewise, Jack is serious about being a good man -- and so is Algernon as Cecily happily suspects. Part of the greatness of their characters is that they are able to balance triviality with seriousness. They know how to have fun and they know when to draw the line. This is a comedy -- not a tragedy.
The fact that it is a comedy also helps with the plot. The guiding hand of Providence that exists to ensure that all comedies end well is there to come to the aid of this one too. Without the revelation that Jack is really the long-lost nephew of Lady Bracknell, the play has no happy ending. This can be nothing other than Wilde submitting his plot to a "higher force" which ensures that such stories end on a high note. Thus, the plot -- like the characters -- is balanced between satire and drama, triviality and seriousness.
Title of the Play
The humor of the title of the play turns on the pun contained within it. "Earnest" is a word that means seriousness and honesty of intention. Yet it sounds exactly like the name which Jack gives to himself whenever he is in town, which is "Ernest." While the title states that it is important to be "earnest," that is, serious, it also seems to playfully suggest that it is also important to be "Ernest," that is, one who leads a double life.
The title works on these two levels just as the characters operate on two levels. They are on the one hand serious when they need to be and on the other hand carefree when they can get away with it. The title may be implying that it is important to be both at times. Indeed, the plot justifies such an interpretation. After all, it is Jack's posing as "Ernest" in town that leads to his meeting with and falling in love with Gwendolen. In fact, even Algernon only knows Jack as "Ernest." This secret identity of his allows him to be sociable in a way he could not be as serious "Jack."
However, the title does suggest that "earnestness" is more important than leading the playful double life. If this were not so, one might argue that Wilde would have titled the play "The Importance of Being Ernest" -- but he did not. Wilde admits with the very title that at the end of the day, one must be serious about life. Yet, Wilde also implies with the pun that it is possible to be serious and fun at the same time. Indeed, the message of the play is that there is no need to hide behind alternate identities: when one is earnest (or serious, decent, and honest) at root, one is able to enjoy oneself at all times and in all places.
The subtitle of the play only confirms for us what the text of the play suggests. Subtitled "A Trivial Comedy for Serious People," the play knows very well what it is about. Wilde asserts from the beginning that serious people must also be able to handle trivialities -- and that trivialities are best handled by serious people. The two go together, so the subtitle suggests -- and the play bears it out.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Wilde has crafted a satire (that focuses on English manners) and a drama (that testifies to the principle of a guiding power in all things). The theme of the "double life" is cleverly explored and, to a degree, approved of -- but only in the sense that the "fun" is balanced by a good principles (or seriousness). Real earnestness is what allows the characters to keep themselves in check, to keep themselves from crossing the line, to keep them from turning comedy into tragedy. At the same time, Providence is there to assist them in the struggle to balance triviality and seriousness. The happy revelation allows Jack to really become "Ernest" and "earnest." It allows Algernon to give up his easy bachelorhood for the satisfying arrangement of marriage. Cynicism is dismissed by the end of the play and the problem of identity is resolved. The message is clear: neither total seriousness nor total triviality will do; one must be able to be trivial and serious at one and the same time: this is the secret to happiness. Perhaps it is this secret that Lane possesses at the beginning of the play, and that the audience mistakes as cynicism.
Reference List
Foster, R. (1956). Wilde as Parodist: A Second Look at the Importance of Being
Earnest. College English, 18(1): 18-23.
Create your account
- Foster, R. (1956). Wilde as Parodist: A Second Look at the Importance of Being
- Earnest. College English, 18(1): 18-23.
- Pearce, J. (2000). The Unmasking of Oscar Wilde. UK: HarperCollins.
- Reinert, O. (1956). Satiric Strategy in The Importance of Being Earnest. College
- English, 18(1): 14-18.
- Wilde, O. (2006). Collected Works. NY: Barnes and Noble.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.