Crucible The Film Version Of Arthur Miller's Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
669
Cite

¶ … Crucible The film version of Arthur Miller's hit Broadway play of 1953 "The Crucible" was released in 1996. Miller

himself wrote the screen play of the film which starred Daniel Day-Lewis and Winona Ryder in lead roles and was directed by Nicholas Hytner.

The Crucible is a fictional retelling of events in American history surrounding the Salem witch trials in the year 1692. The film, as well as the play on which it is based, is however in no way an accurate description of history and takes considerable liberties with the actual events that took place during the trial. The film is set in the Puritan era in a small town (Salem) in colonial Massachusetts when twenty innocent men and women were accused of witchcraft and put to 17th century Massachusetts and never did. The naked dancing in the forest by a group of adolescent girls is not only impossible to believe, it also takes the movie further away from a faithful rendition of the actual…

Sources Used in Documents:

Reference

Ebert, Roger. (1996). "The Crucible." Movie Review. Chicago Sun-Times. December 20, 1996. Retrieved on December 15, 2004 from http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19961220/REVIEWS/612200302/1023

At the ripe old age of 81

Miller himself said, "The play is not reportage of any kind .... what I was doing was writing a fictional story about an important theme."


Cite this Document:

"Crucible The Film Version Of Arthur Miller's" (2004, December 15) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/crucible-the-film-version-of-arthur-miller-60570

"Crucible The Film Version Of Arthur Miller's" 15 December 2004. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/crucible-the-film-version-of-arthur-miller-60570>

"Crucible The Film Version Of Arthur Miller's", 15 December 2004, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/crucible-the-film-version-of-arthur-miller-60570

Related Documents

QUESTION #2: Was John Proctor essentially a good man? Yes, Proctor was a good man in his heart; he made a mistake by getting involved with Abigail, but when she came back to him hoping to rekindle the flame between them, he turned down the chance for another sexual liaison with a woman much younger than his wife. When the community began to turn hysterical, Proctor was a voice of

However, the storytelling itself seemed to take a backseat to the drama, and it made the film drag in spots. It also could have been much more innovative in direction and cinematography. The scenes were rich and full, and the director did use some camera angles (such as above in the church/courtroom), and above again in a scene where Abigail "sees" a spirit above her and collapses in the court.