Current Events And U.S. Diplomacy Defining The Essay

PAGES
4
WORDS
1283
Cite
Related Topics:

Current Events and U.S. Diplomacy Defining the U.S. President Doctrine

presidential doctrines refer to the stances, goals, policies, and attitudes that are acted by the country's foreign affairs. Moreover, the President of the U.S. outlines them. They are often referred to as "doctrines" since they elicit the country's sovereignty and stance in various policies, internal and external. Most American doctrines have touched on cold war and other foreign matters. The presidents who have led the country have often been swayed to handle their foreign matters and issues with statements of the doctrines. For instance, there are various doctrines, which have been outlined by the U.S. presidents. Some of them are Monroe doctrine by President James Monroe, Truman doctrine by President Harry Truman, and many others. All the doctrines are characterized by foreign policies (Nuechterlein, 2001).

The Reagan Doctrine

The Reagan doctrine is one of the doctrines of the United States. This doctrine became significant during the period of the cold war in the U.S. And Soviet Union. Before the war, the U.S. had sort to look for ways and means of protecting its nation against possible attacks, which were culminated by the cold war. There was an awesome atmosphere for war eruption, something that led to President Reagan's outlining of the doctrine. The U.S. was looking for ways of countering the Soviet Union, which had imposed communism government and led to the establishment of the client states. Because of the U.S. support on anti-communism guerillas, the country had to stay safe and far away from possible wars, which could erupt as part of the continuing cold war. Moreover, the doctrine was a creation of Brezhnev reaction. It later became the U.S.'s centerpiece, which lasted in the 80s until the end of the cold war.

Regional or global events during the cold war up to the formation of the presidential doctrine

The notable global events, which led to the formation of Reagan doctrines,...

...

The U.S. was part of the supporters who offered assistance to rally behind those who were against communism. The war took many U.S. soldiers, most of which had been sending in support of other nations. Back at home, the U.S. feared fresh attacks due to its support of the anti-communists. As such, there were several international issues, which were facing the nation. This prompted the then presidents, Reagan to outline the doctrine in his self-defense as a nation. The Soviet Union was on its way to introduce communism in various parts of the world as in Africa, Asia, together with the Latin America.
Cold war between Soviet Union and the U.S. before announcement of the Reagan doctrine

Before the announcement of the Reagan doctrine, the U.S. And Soviet Union were not in good terms. The U.S. had supported the anti-communist groups, something that had frustrated the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was against the U.S. due to this support. The intentions of the Soviet Union were to have a dominion over many communities as in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Because of U.S. refusal for this to happen, there was a tense relationship between the two nations. The U.S. intended to introduce democracy and capitalism in those states. This was against the Soviet's plans. When the Reagan doctrine was announced, the intention of the U.S. changed from that of trying to eliminate introduction of communism to the elimination of communistic governments (Hastedt, 2004). This had frustrated the Soviet communist government. As such, the announcement and implementation of the Reagan doctrine in 1979 prompted a tense relationship between the two nations.

Current relationship between the U.S. And Soviet Union

With the collapse of the Soviet Union, the U.S. acquired plenty of space to make Russia corporate in its delicacies. This has resulted in much siege of Russia by the U.S., something that has created a…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Busch, A.E. (2001). Ronald Reagan and the politics of freedom. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Hastedt, G.P. (2004). Encyclopedia of American foreign policy. New York: Facts on File.

Nuechterlein, D.E. (2001). America recommitted: A superpower assesses its role if a turbulent world. Lexington: Univ. Press of Kentucky.

Radu, M., & Arnold, A. (1990). The New insurgencies: Anticommunist guerrillas in the Third


Cite this Document:

"Current Events And U S Diplomacy Defining The" (2012, December 09) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/current-events-and-us-diplomacy-defining-83576

"Current Events And U S Diplomacy Defining The" 09 December 2012. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/current-events-and-us-diplomacy-defining-83576>

"Current Events And U S Diplomacy Defining The", 09 December 2012, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/current-events-and-us-diplomacy-defining-83576

Related Documents

U.S. National Strategy What three United States national interests do you think will be at great risk over the next five years? Describe those interests and identify which instruments of national power can be leveraged to protect or advance those national interests and how those instruments can be used. As President Obama stated in his addresses to Congress in February 2009, the most important problem that the country faced was the economy,

" It seems perfectly apparent that this was the original policy of the U.S. In Afghanistan specific to the Soviet Union. The CSR Report for Congress entitled: "Afghanistan: Current Issues and U.S. Policy" Kenneth Katzman, Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs writes that the policy objectives of the United States in Afghanistan have: "...long gone beyond establishing political stability and combating terrorist groups operating in Afghanistan." (Katzman, 2005) IV. PRESENT U.S. INVOLVEMENT

Moreover, the lack of support from the American public brings to fore an issue raised by Grover (3) with the deployment of U.S. military personnel in various parts of the world. As many of these deployments have "the potential for violent conflict," this calls for "the need to respond quickly and decisively," which is hinged on the "unambiguous support of the American people." There is no other U.S. president

The research, methods will seek to establish a common basement of the U.S. President Foreign Policy Decision Making Process. Equitable regard will be accorded to the state of affairs that exist between the U.S.A. And Iran Questionnaires Questionnaires are samples of structured questions that will seek directive responses from the respondents in the field of study. In order to arrive at making decisions, there are several considerations that the president of

history of China's importance to the U.S., from Nixon's visit to China in 1972 to the present, which contributed to the implementation of Obama's 'U.S. Pivot to Asia Strategy'? The Cold War represented one of the most important periods in the history of the world. It did not only changed the way in which the political world was configured following the end of the Second World War, but, at the

"We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed. But neither can two great and powerful groups of nations take comfort from our present course. Both sides overburdened by the cost of modern weapons, both rightly alarmed by the steady spread of the deadly atom, yet both racing to alter