Debate Capital Punishment Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
1003
Cite

Capital Punishment Debate The United States is one of the few industrialized nations in the world that still practices capital punishment. Most European nations and our northern neighbor Canada do not have the death penalty and in fact will not send wanted criminals to the United States because of their opposition to capital punishment. Proponents of the death penalty say that it can be a deterrent to crime, that it can be cheaper than life without parole sentences, that it is a viable and just response to murder, that the death penalty is a moral imperative or even a display of divine justice. However, statistics and facts prove otherwise, which is why I am firmly opposed to capital punishment. I base my argument on four major points. First, studies show that the death penalty is costly, more costly than incarceration. Second, the death penalty is irreversible. Many people are wrongfully convicted, and those people will never be able to get their lives back once they are killed. Third, the death penalty is unfortunately linked with racial prejudice. Finally, most criminologists agree that the death penalty is not a deterrent of crime. I am also opposed to the death penalty on humanitarian grounds and am appalled that...

...

For these reasons, I believe that capital punishment does no good and in fact it may contribute to a violent society and should therefore be ruled as unconstitutional.
The death penalty is gradually falling out of favor in some states because of the reasons I mentioned. For example, in 2004 New York and Kansas ruled that capital punishment was unconstitutional. In New York, that decision was based on cost as well as humanitarian reasons. A New York legislator states, "I have some doubt whether we need a death penalty ... We are spending tens of millions of dollars that may be better spent on educating children," (quoted on "the Death Penalty Information" website). In Kansas, the cost of death penalty cases was as much as 70% higher than non-capital cases ("Death Penalty Information Center"). In spite of these costs, 38 out of 50 states still allow the death penalty; only twelve states do not. In Florida, a state with one the highest rates of executions in the nation, enforcing the death penalty costs about $51 million per year more than it would cost to sentence the same criminals to life without parole. Therefore, the death penalty is costing taxpayers inordinate amounts of money, money that could be much better spent elsewhere, from educating children, to alleviating problems related to health care and homelessness.

Second, the death penalty is irreversible but many people are wrongfully accused and convicted of crimes. Once they are killed these innocent victims of the state have no recourse and neither do their families. In New York, as many as 130 cases since the 1980s have been wrongful convictions ("Death Penalty Information Center"). According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), "one person has been exonerated for every…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

'A Question of Innocence." ACLU. 9 Dec 2003. < http://www.aclu.org/DeathPenalty/DeathPenalty.cfm?ID=9316&; c=65>.

'Death Penalty Information Center." < http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/FactSheet.pdf>.

"Race and the Death Penalty." ACLU. 26 Feb 2003. < http://www.aclu.org/DeathPenalty/DeathPenalty.cfm?ID=9312&; c=62>.

Robinson, Bruce. "Capital Punishment; The Death Penalty." Religious Tolerance.org. < http://www.religioustolerance.org/execute.htm>.


Cite this Document:

"Debate Capital Punishment" (2005, January 31) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/debate-capital-punishment-61581

"Debate Capital Punishment" 31 January 2005. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/debate-capital-punishment-61581>

"Debate Capital Punishment", 31 January 2005, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/debate-capital-punishment-61581

Related Documents

The immunities are spying, sedition and drug trafficking in huge quantities. Soon after two years, in reply to the Oklahoma City Bombing, President Clinton signed the anti-terrorism and effectual death penalty law in 1996. The acts which have an effect equally on state and federal criminals limited the evaluation in federal courts by setting up even more strict file targets, restraining the chance for evidentiary inquiries and customarily permitting

Death Penalty This informative speech outline topic DOES THE DEATH PENALTY DETER CRIME? The outline detailed 4 APA references. It follow format detailed referenced. Please outline tornadoes OUTLINE FOR INFORMATIVE SPEECH Tornadoes Purpose: To inform audience tornadoes Thesis: Today I discuss fascinating facts tornadoes. To inform the audience about the two sides of the debate on the death penalty, regarding its justice and its deterrent effect. The death penalty is one of the

Death Penalty An on-going Debate on Ethics and Morality The debate on whether the death penalty, or capital punishment, should be utilized in the United States is best seen in the varied laws that exist within each state. For this reason, many states, most of which are in the northern parts of the country are against capital punishment, while many southern states support this kind of a law. The U.S. map is

Death Penalty All indications are that capital offenses are on the rise and the response to this phenomenon has been a cry to impose capital punishment as retribution. Certainly the issue is one of the most hotly debated in the world today; both for consideration of its humaneness as well as efficacy as a deterrent. For the purposes of this assignment we will examine the issue from both sides with the

The debate over the death penalty remains and the Supreme Court will most likely be asked decide such cases for years to come. Summary and Conclusion The purpose of this discussion was to examine several landmark Supreme Court cases and explain the evolution of capital punishment jurisprudence from 1972 to the present. The research focused on the cases of Furman v Georgia, Woodson v. North Carolina, Gregg v Georgia, McCleskey v

The death penalty may exact a high cost but so does remaining behind bars for life imprisonment (Haag 1986). But righting wrongs in a society has a higher option than entailing the costs. Penalties are also acts of social retribution to restrain personal or private vengeance aimed at vindicating the law and social order, which has been injured or violated by a crime. Proponents or advocates of the death penalty