¶ … Terrorist
It is often said that there is no 'typical' terrorist: terrorism can spring from a multitude of psychological and political causes. Some terrorist groups are mainly political in their aims; others, as was the case with the 9/11 hijackers are primarily religious in terms of how they articulate their ideology. However, the 9/11 terrorists still exhibited a political dimension in their actions, given that they were instrumental in attacking major sites of American power, symbolic of their desire to end American influence in the Islamic world and to curtail the overall influence of America worldwide.
Terrorists can and do come from a wide array of social classes but are not necessarily poor; rather "the frustration-aggression hypothesis" of terrorism is based on "a gap between rising expectations and need satisfaction" (Hudson 1999). In other words, when economic and personal opportunities do not keep pace with the reality experienced by the terrorists, this causes the individuals to become radicalized. But the 9/11 terrorists were obviously not renegade young men, lashing out at society. They were highly trained, professional terrorists who learned their 'trade' in Al-Qaida training camps and had participated in terrorist activities before. The plot was systematized rather than a random act of violence and depended upon the loyalty of the persons involved to the objective; else the plot would not have 'worked.'
You’re 66% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.