Ethics, indigenous knowledge, and archaeological stewardship
The paper answers numerous questions related to archaeology. The questions addressed involve the principles of archaeology, ethics, theory, methods, and case studies. The questions and answers are categorized into sections.
✍️ How to write this paper — guide & tools ▾
Archaeology and Science
Required Reading:
The Idea of Indigenous Knowledge. Horsthemke Indigenous Knowledge and Archaeological Science. Green, Green, and Neves
Can the Sciences Help Us to Make Wise Ethical Judgments? Kurtz
What is Archaeology Today? Pyburn & Joyce
Do you think Peter Matthews bears any responsibility for what happened to him? How might he have avoided the unpleasant experience he had in Chiapas?
I do not think he bears any responsibility for what happened to him because he did not violate any professional or academic ethics while doing his work. However, he could have learnt the impact of the local socio-economic problems that fostered crime and made local councils ineffective. He could have learnt that the criminal gangs were capable of exploiting the social instability.
Is it ethical to restrict intellectual freedom?
It is unethical to restrict intellectual freedom because once some restrictions are applied, semantics could be then used to further restrict intellectual freedom. Furthermore, intellectual freedom encourages innovation and creativity.
3. What is the difference between cultural relativism and moral relativism?
Cultural relativism suggests that archeologists and scholars need to understand and evaluate practices of other cultures within the context of their specific histories. Moral relativism assumes that moral judgments are impossible without locating each practice within the context of its culture. Cultural relativists can have moral judgments but for the sake of understanding cultural practices properly, they evaluate them in terms relative to those specific cultures.
4. Are all stories about the past equally good?
Not necessarily because some stories about the past have greater significance than others. But the concept of the "good" here should be understood in relative terms, as we cannot subject modern-day understandings of good or bad to the past.
5. Why do you think the SAA Code puts "stewardship" first?
The SAA Code states that archaeological collections, sites, and materials are irreplaceable. Therefore, it puts stewardship first because it is emphasized that it is the responsibility of archeologists to preserve archaeological record by promoting stewardship.
6. Why did I ask you to pass the human subjects test?
Did not find any answers in the readings.
Stakeholders
Required Reading:
Ethics and Archaeology: The Attempt at Catalhoyuk. Hodder Can you hear me back? Holtorf
Building a Bridge to Cross a Thousand Years. Lippert Producing knowledge for multiple stakeholders. Pyburn & Joyce
Ethics in Action [excerpt]. Colewell-Chanthaphonh, Hollowell, McGill
Discussion questions:
1. Make a list of as many groups of stakeholders in archaeological resources as you can.
Archaeologists (scholars, students, volunteers), the public, local communities, universities, foundations, cultural centers, preservation centers, museums, archives, governments, civil society, artists
2. What can archaeologists do to address concerns of Indigenous People?
Archaeologists need to realize that currently there are unequal power relations in place and therefore adopt democratic principles in forming ethical and moral standards in archeological research. Archeologists also should try to view the archeological record from the perspective of indigenous people to understand its meaning within the context of indigenous culture.
3. Do Indigenous People have special rights concerning archaeological sites and artifacts?
Yes, they have the right to participate in the excavations and share their concerns as well as knowledge. They are important stakeholders.
4. What rights do archaeologists have to do their work?
Archaeologists' rights are subject to laws and regulations of individual countries. Archaeologists need to work within the confines of laws and standards set by the main stakeholders (respecting the rights of all). For example, in the United States, an archeologist has proprietary rights to a site on the condition that he/she completes a complete report within ten years after the completion of a field work.
5. Are archaeologists stakeholders?
Yes. Stakeholders in archeology are those who have interest in archeological research. Archeologists are one of the main interested groups. Therefore, they are stakeholders.
Stewardship
Required Reading:
In the Spirit of the Code. Smith & Burke
Stewardship Gone Astray. Groarke & Warrick
Our Collective Responsibility. Zimmerman Ethnography & Historic Preservation. Holyoak Discussion questions:
1. What are some conflicting definitions of Stewardship?
Because the SAA definition of stewardship is criticized for vagueness, confusing ethical and political concerns, inconsistency, and not properly recognizing those aspects of ethics that transcend stewardship, scholars proposed other definitions. One definition suggests that archaeologists should respect all interested and affected parties and assume that the goals of archaeological research may be superseded by these obligations. Others objected to the use of the word "should" in the definition, as it implies moral obligation.
2. Can a profit motive be reconciled with preservation?
Basically no. When a profit is involved, it corrupts the basic professional standards of preservation. For example, the involvement of profit weakens such contracts in archaeological work as archaeological criteria of research significance, publication of data, and peer review of projects and data.
3. How should site significance be determined?
The following questions should be asked: does this site have any meaning to local communities? Does this site represent a cultural heritage? Does the study of this site can help us learn about history or the culture of people who lived here?
Professional Conduct
Required Reading:
How to Pick an Archaeological Field School. Pyburn & Joyce
Golden Marshalltown.Flannery
http://www.rpanet.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=2
Teaching Archaeology in the 21st Century.Davis
Discussion questions:
1. What should you look for in a field school?
Whether the school is an accredited institution and whether the professional standards and ethics of archaeological research are followed. Whether real world problem solving scenarios could be practiced there.
2. What things must every archaeologist be trained to do?
They need to be trained in archaeology, cultural anthropology, linguistics, and learn to apply methods and theory into practice. They also need to understand the code of ethics.
3. Should archaeology be separate from anthropology?
Yes, they need to be separate because archaeology stresses greater emphasis on preservation and stewardship. But a multi-disciplinary approach is always useful.
4. Should archaeology students be required to take ethnographic methods classes?
Yes, because that knowledge is necessary in understanding the cultures of local communities or indigenous people on whose territory an archeologist studies sites and artifacts. Local communities are also affected by excavations and the knowledge about them is essential for doing archaeology.
5. Why is timely publication important? The data are already old!
One of the main stakeholders in archaeology is the public. Timely publication is necessary for public accountability.
6. Should archaeologists drink in the field?
There is no rule saying that they should and there is no rule against mild drinking. Excessive drinking should be avoided although many archaeologists often indulge themselves in heavy drinking in the field.
7. Should field crews develop personal relationships with local people? How personal?
Yes, but those relationships should still remain within the confines of professionalism. The relationships should be personal enough to gain the deserved trust of local people.
8. How has archaeology changed since Flannery wrote the Golden Marshalltown parable?
Since then it has incorporated new theories involving feminism, postmodernism, postcolonialism, and theories from cultural studies and indigenous studies.
9. How has it stayed the same?
Basic forms of approach, trying to make archaeological research as a scientifically rigorous discipline is still in place although this approach has been challenged and criticized by many scholars.
The Art Market
Required Reading:
Ethical
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.