Elder And Paul 2002 Point Out An Essay

¶ … Elder and Paul (2002) point out an inference is the conclusion that "something is true in light of something else being true." An assumption is something taken for granted. In the case of ExtraVert, the first inference is that the communication and cooperation problems that exist between the home company and its overseas branch are a resulted of the cultural differences. There are several arguments given in support of this inference. The branch is overseas and, given the fact that cost factors make it an attractive destination, the facility could be in China or in other parts of Asia. From this starting point, there is a logical reasoning that is based on different studies that reflect cultural differences, particularly when it comes to China.

This reasoning points out that Chinese managers have a particular view about their role in the global organization, especially about the decision making process and the way they are subordinating to the leadership in the mother company. They expect to consult with their superiors on all decisions, which implies a continuous communication both vertically and horizontally in the hierarchy. The logical conclusion would thus be that the problems come from the fact that the managers of the overseas branch lack guidance and don't assume...

...

As Klement (2013) pointed out, a deductive reasoning starts from assumptions, from statements believed to be true, and aims to discover additional true statements from these assumptions. In this case, the analysis started with two fundamentally true statements from which one attempts to draw additional true conclusions. The two statements were that there were problems between the home company and the overseas branch and that these problems were identified as communication and cooperation problems.
Another assumption made as an explanation to why there are problems with the overseas branch is that there is a dysfunctional organizational culture. This assumption is based on the fact that a global organization needs to be driven by an organizational culture and by objectives that all its parts recognize. The assumption is that the objectives that the overseas branch may differ from those that the headquarters have.

For example, the overseas branch may look for quick profits because these are recognized and rewarded with a certain percentage. As such, they are promoting quick sales. The headquarters, however, may look towards consolidating and building market share, being more interested…

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

1. Klement, KC, (2013). Deductive and Inductive Arguments. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. On the Internet at http://www.iep.utm.edu/ded-ind/. Last retrieved on January 29, 2014

2. Elder, Linda; Paul, Richard, (2002). Critical Thinking: Distinguishing Between Inferences and Assumptions. Volume 25, Number 3


Cite this Document:

"Elder And Paul 2002 Point Out An" (2014, January 29) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/elder-and-paul-2002-point-out-an-181653

"Elder And Paul 2002 Point Out An" 29 January 2014. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/elder-and-paul-2002-point-out-an-181653>

"Elder And Paul 2002 Point Out An", 29 January 2014, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/elder-and-paul-2002-point-out-an-181653

Related Documents

Lesbian Health Care Lesbian Health Issues in a Heterosexual Society The additional burdens placed on the lives of minorities as a result of social exclusion can lead to health disparities. Social exclusion theory has been used in previous research to investigate the health disparities that exist between socioeconomic classes and individuals of different ethnic backgrounds living in the United States, but it has not yet been applied to another important minority group:

The most general critical thinking strategy involves the following steps, outlined by Cohen et al. (2000). First, we propose certain statements or hypotheses. For example, I have written down my thoughts at this stage in the decision-making process if I have too many ideas. Second, we need to think of or actively solicit counter-arguments. We need alternative explanations for our observations. So in my situation, I need to brainstorm

Nursing Argument Getting old is not very fun when considering the opinions of the elderly. This is true because many hard and difficult decisions must be made in terms of health and health care. Two options immediately arise when one is not able to take care of themselves and seek the assistance of others. The first option is home health care and the other is nursing home health care. The purpose

high degree of misinformation I had received from traditional teachings about the church and the beginning of Christianity. Moreover, I was struck by the notion that most other people in the Western world receive this same degree of intentional misinformation, so much so that I have even heard people defend the idea that knowledge of the historical church is irrelevant to modern Christianity. Reading through the class material, I

More is learned every day in the field of medicine and nursing, and articles such as this one serve to point out that there is much more that needs to be learned. Serving the elderly population with Alzheimer's disease and treating them for their problems is often quite difficult, but the information in the article regarding what behaviors to look for in individuals that cannot express their pain verbally

Critical Thinking for Homeland Security The objective of the article is to question the credibility of the decision adopting by the Bush's administration on North Korea due to claims that it (North Korea) was constructing a Uranium plant. Based on the universal structures of thought by Elder and Paul, it is apparent that the question at issue in the presented case is the credibility of the decision taken by the U.S.