¶ … emergency centers, I expect to find the response performance of trauma centers in Connecticut to be well intentioned in their endeavor to rapidly and effectually reach out to survivors, but to be incapacitated by a host of hindrances. I, further, expect these hindrances to consist of inappropriate and delayed response to emergency situations I also expect to witness the inability to effectively manage, control, and supervise multiple processes. Most significantly, it is quite likely that delivery service will be distracted from focusing on patient and be diverted by the enormous complexity of tasks and responsibilities that are involved in their service. Superb emergency preparedness necessitates an interdisciplinary approach to knowledge so that all parts of the service can be effectively accomplished: not only duties that focus on prevention but also decision-making, and a commitment to improving the life of the survivors. It is more than likely, given my research and knowledge of the Connecticut emergency sector, that knowledge in one or more of these areas is lacking. Ability to juggle various tasks simultaneously is difficult and awkward. It is my assumption that the Connecticut centers, in conjunction with others, experience enormous stress and challenge in so doing. Finally, the trauma centers have to not only focus on delivery systems, but they have to do so within perimeters of accountability and synchronized cooperation amongst all stakeholders whilst the team has immediate access to resources in a timely and constant manner. All this has to be accomplished...

Given the constant and predictable amount of stress encountered, I expect this to be a tall order for the Connecticut centers to achieve.
Enhancement of perception and training as well as making the centers aware of their lapses will improve emergency preparedness. It is for this reason alone that I consider this research to be invaluable.

I also consider this study to have potential contribution to current literature on the topic in that only a small quantity exists on the conditions of emergency preparedness in certain centers, and then only certain centers have been studied. Authoritative and reliable scientific research necessitates reiterated study of the same phenomena on large and diversified samples. By extending previous study of emergency preparedness in trauma centers to emergency preparedness in trauma centers of Connecticut, I can assess whether the same situation exists here and, if so, to which degree and in which elements. If it does, then the addition of this study lends increased force to the previous thesis that trauma centers, in general, lack a state of preparedness. More so, this study will provide an analysis of trauma centers in connection to Connecticut in particular and by so doing will, by providing a case study of one, possibly lead to a grounded theory situation where we can expend from the case of one to the case of others. The Qualitative aspect of the study will enable us to dig up the rich data in regards to the operation of emergency centers in Connecticut. The…