Environmental Justice Clear Water Act Term Paper

Environmental Justice Clean Water Act

Introduction

The Clean Water Act (CWA) is a United States federal law that establishes the basic structure for regulating pollution in the nation's waterways. It is one of the core pieces of legislation that has helped to make the United States a leader in environmental protection. The Clean Water Act requires all facilities that discharge pollutants into "navigable waters" to obtain a permit from the Environmental Protection Agency. This permit includes limits on the types and amounts of pollutants that can be released. In addition, the law prohibits the discharge of any pollutants that would result in an "unreasonable" impact on water quality. The Clean Water Act has been amended several times since it was first enacted in 1972, and it continues to play a vital role in protecting the nation's waters (Copeland, 2001). This paper will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the CWA while maintaining a perspective of environmental justice.

Strengths of the CWA

The CWA regulates the discharge of pollutants into the nations waterways. It is one of the major pieces of environmental legislation enacted by the federal government and has been successful in improving water quality across the country. One of the main strengths of the CWA is its comprehensive approach to water pollution. The CWA regulates point sources (such as factories and sewage treatment plants). The Act also establishes strict limits on the discharge of pollutants and requires facilities to obtain permits before discharging any pollutants. In addition, the CWA provides funding for water pollution control efforts and supports research on new methods of pollution prevention. As a result of these provisions, the CWA has been successful in reducing water pollution nationwide.

Weaknesses of the CWA

Although the Clean Water Act is a landmark federal law that protects the nation's waterways from pollution, the law has several weaknesses that have become increasingly apparent over time. One major flaw is the Act's definition of "navigable waters." The Supreme Court has interpreted this term very narrowly, excluding many types of water bodies from coverage under the Act. As a result, many of the nation's streams and wetlands are not protected from pollution. In addition, the Clean Water Act does not address nonpoint source pollution, which is one of the most serious threats to water quality (Andreen, 2003). This type of pollution comes from diffuse sources, such as agricultural runoff and urban stormwater runoff. As a result, the Clean Water Act has had only limited success in achieving its goal of clean and healthy waterways for all Americans.

Environmental Justice

Environmental justice is the fair treatment of people of all races, ethnicities,...…of the CWA from the standpoint of environmental justice. Some believe that the CWA does not do enough to protect low-income and minority communities from water pollution. These communities are often located near factories and other sources of water pollution, and they often lack the resources to address water contamination. As a result, they may be exposed to higher levels of pollution than other communities. Additionally, some have argued that the fines imposed under the CWA are not high enough to deter polluters, and that the government should do more to enforce the law. Overall, the CWA has made significant progress in cleaning up waterways, but there is still room for improvement in terms of environmental justice.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Clean Water Act is a law passed by the United States Congress in 1972. The law was designed to protect the nation's water supply from pollution and contamination. The act imposed strict regulations on factories and businesses that discharge pollutants into waterways. However, some environmental groups have criticized the act for not doing enough to protect the environment. They argue that the act does not address the issue of nonpoint-source pollution, which is pollution that comes from many different sources, such as cars and farms. Indeed, from an environmental justice point of view, the CWA could do much more to ensure…

Sources Used in Documents:

References


Andreen, W. L. (2003). Water quality today-has the clean water act been a success. Ala. L. Rev., 55, 537.


Copeland, C. (2001). Clean water act. Huntington NY: Nova Science Press.


Kleinman, P., Blunk, K. S., Bryant, R., Saporito, L., Beegle, D., Czymmek, K., ... & Smith, M. (2012). Managing manure for sustainable livestock production in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 67(2), 54A-61A.


Cite this Document:

"Environmental Justice Clear Water Act" (2022, November 06) Retrieved April 29, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/environmental-justice-clear-water-act-term-paper-2177859

"Environmental Justice Clear Water Act" 06 November 2022. Web.29 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/environmental-justice-clear-water-act-term-paper-2177859>

"Environmental Justice Clear Water Act", 06 November 2022, Accessed.29 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/environmental-justice-clear-water-act-term-paper-2177859

Related Documents

Environmental Justice and the Environmental Rights of Russian Indigenous People in the Arctic Region The research proposed in this study is that concerning the legal protection of indigenous peoples and particularly in regards to environmental rights under international and domestic law. The research proposed has a special emphasis on the Russian indigenous peoples of the Arctic region. The primary goal of the research proposed in this study is to determine and analyze

For example, unequal protection may result from land-use decisions that determine the location of residential amenities and disamenities. Unincorporated, poor, and communities of color often suffer a "triple" vulnerability of noxious facility siting." (Bullard, 1998) Finally, 'Social Equity' is that which "assesses the role of sociological factors (race, ethnicity, class, culture, life styles, political power, etc.) on environmental decision making. Poor people and people of color often work in the

Environmental Justice in the United States: Policies, Beliefs & People/Places Involved During the course of my college career, my interests and passions have changed, gradually evolving to an intensified mix of all that my Interdisciplinary Studies major encompasses. I began my college career seeking a Mass Communication degree; a course of study that focused primarily on community organization and mobilization. After feeling the harsh reality of advertising and public relations evils, I

Managing Environmental Justice Issues: Environmental justice can be considered as the social justice outlook of environmental ethics that has contributed to the emergence of the environmental justice movement to tackle the unfair allocation of toxic, dangerous, and hazardous waste facilities. This term can also be described as the right to safe, productive, healthy, and sustainable environment for every individual. In this case, the environment incorporates the physical, social, ecological, political, economic,

In terms of Singer's work, although his solutions are not practical in the sense of Paehlke's work, his call for a change in the political system does make sense. Political leaders should be called away from their isolated mentality and use their power to effect the changes necessary for a better world. Both authors recognize that globalization cannot be denied, and that some aspects related to the phenomenon are beneficial while