Ethical Situations That Influence Consumer

Ethical Situations That Influence Consumer Behavior

Counterfeiting expensive merchandise and making it available at significantly lower prices without regard for the legal or ethical implications of this practice cost the apparel, accessory and merchandise industry nearly $200B a year in lost jobs, taxes and sales (Phau, Sequeira, Dix, 2009). There is also the damage to brand equity and the image of brands as well, as often counterfeiters cut corners and deliver shoddy merchandise that often disintegrates faster than the actual item (Phau, Teah, 2009). The intent of this analysis is to evaluate four different peer-reviewed, empirical studies that seek to define the influence of ethics on decision-making processes of consumers of both legitimate and counterfeit luxury items. From online-only sales (Radon, 2012) to sales made through malls throughout Asia (Phau, Teah, 2009) the majority of sales channels counterfeiters and legitimize luxury goods manufacturers use to sell their products are presented.

Analysis of To Buy or Not To Buy A "Counterfeit" Ralph Lauren Polo Shirt: The Role of Lawfulness and Legality toward Purchasing Counterfeits

The foundational elements of this study included a methodology that centered on showing a real Ralph Lauren shirt and a counterfeit one, and then asking if the responded would knowingly purchase the fake one. The results showed that women have higher ethical standards than men and that men, while seeking the prestige of this and other branded items, fear being found out when they purchase a counterfeit (Phau, Sequeira, Dix, 2009).

The study methodology was based on a convenience sampling method at a large Australian University in their business school. The stimulus of the study was a Ralph Lauren Polo shirt. The data collection instrument was a survey form of three pages, with the first page having a picture and brief description of the shirt, the second being a seven-point Likert scale asking them what the probability of their purchasing the short was. Next, a counterfeit version of the shirt was shown, and the respondents were next asked to rate their probability of purchasing that item. They were also told it was of inferior quality as well. The second page also included screening questions to see if the respondent had ever purchased counterfeit products before. These questions were used for screening respondents. This was followed by scales to measure the attitude towards lawfulness of counterfeits (Phau, Sequeira, Dix, 2009).

The demographics of the sample included 48.5% male, and 51.5% were female. The majority of respondents (65.6%) were between the ages of 18 and 21. About 25% were between the ages of 22 to 25 and 9/1% were above 25 years of age. Given the majority of the respondents were students, their annual incomes was AUD$20K or less (77.7%). Eight of ten respondents (80%) had purchased counterfeits, with males being the majority of purchasers in the study. The 40% of the counterfeit product buyers were in the 19 to 21-year-old segment, with the majority being males.

The study findings underscore what previous studies have found, specifically showing how pervasive counterfeit purchasers are in lower-income, younger groups of males (Phau, Sequeira, Dix, 2009). The results also corroborate with the findings of previous studies that women are more ethical in their purchases of products. These findings led the researchers to conclude that integrity is a very strong influencer of the willingness to forgo the purchase of counterfeit products (Phau, Sequeira, Dix, 2009). It also underscores that the more rapid the product lifecycle of a given product, the more the tendency of counterfeiters to see the small, fast-moving windows of opportunity and move quickly with badly produced merchandise at low prices. Consumers literally get what they pay for in these scenarios.

The studies' limitations include the convenience sampling approach taken and the lack of statistical validity that applies to the research design. This study has limited value across the entire Australian market as well, as it concentrates on only a very small segment, the business studies at a major Australian university. Due to all of these factors, the findings are of limited value on a global basis as well and cannot be extrapolated across global demographic and socio-economic groups as a result.

Analysis of Examining Ethics and Materialism with Purchase of Counterfeits

The greater the value of ethicacy to a given shopper the less likely they are to consider the purchase of counterfeit products. This is one of the most significant findings from the research completed in the study Examining Ethics and Materialism with Purchase of Counterfeits (Kozar, Marcketti, 2011). The study methodology is based on an online survey of 741 respondents who were recruited from newspaper advertisements in university newspapers in two four-year universities in the Midwestern United States. The advertisements included a promise of a $150 cash prize incentive that would be awarded at the end of the semester. The researchers completed several pretests of the survey with academic advisors prior to implementing the overall study.

The data collection instrument, has been said before, was an online survey that was designed to capitalize on the Muncy-Vitell consumer ethics scale (Kozar, Marcketti, 2011). This scale combines the validation of a Likert five-point design and the testing of ethical trade-offs. The researchers designed this aspect of the survey to reflect the value judgments and trade-offs of actively benefiting from a counterfeit product, passively benefiting from it and how approving or not a given respondent was with these dimensions of ethicacy. The scale also included 18 different attribute descriptions that measured the trade-offs respondents also made between ethical vs. unethical outcomes from the standpoint of acquiring materialistic products (Kozar, Marcketti, 2011).

The demographics of this study included 741 students, with 50% being between the ages of 18 and 20 and 35% between the ages of 21 to 23., and 15% over the age of 24. 76% of the respondents were women and 24% were men. 86.5% of the sample was Caucasian and the remainder was African-American, Asian-American, and Hispanic. The distribution by educational level included 22.7% in their first year, 21.3% in the second year, 22.7% in the third year and 26.5% in the fourth year., A total of 6.8% of respondents were in graduate products. 68% had knowingly purchased counterfeit products in the past.

The study findings showed that there is a strong relationship in the respondent population with regard to the relationship of ethics and materialism. Consumers in this study who had higher ethical values were less materialistic and also declined ot purchase counterfeit products in the past. This was the 20% of respondents who had never purchased a counterfeit product, and whose philosophies reflected a non-materialistic view of life. The limitations of this study include the limited sample frame of Midwestern U.S.-based universities who are not representative fog the broader U.S. population. Second, this study lacked validity across a broader base of respondents within different socio-economic strata as well. Third, the study also lacked a clear definition of how price would impact overall judgments of ethicacy.

Analysis of Devil Wears (Counterfeit) Prada: A Study of Antecedents and Outcomes of Attitudes Towards Counterfeits of Luxury Brands

China is known for having an exceptionally high level of collectivism and shared expectations in addition to saving face with peers and superiors. The findings of this study show that surprisingly collectivism is not nearly as powerful of a predictor of purchase intention for counterfeit products as the lack of ethicacy is (Phau, Teah, 2009). Like other studies, the greater the integrity of a respondent as measured by their ethicacy the greater the probability they would not purchase a counterfeit product deliberately (Kozar, Marcketti, 2011).

The methodology for this study is based on a mall intercept model completed in a downtown Shanghai shopping center. The questionnaire was self-administered and given to every fifth shopper in the mall. This sampling approach delivered a 14% overall response rate. What made the questionnaire unique was the focus on showing two different value statements for the purchased of counterfeit goods; one showed a peddler selling fake products and the other asked more generic questions. The researchers provided the following table of the demographics of respondents by non-buyers and buyers of counterfeit goods:

Table II Sample distribution between buyers and non-buyers of counterfeits of luxury brands. Source: (Phau, Teah, 2009)

The study's findings indicate that consumption purely for status and integrity are both the most significant factors in defining which products are purchased from legitimate vs. counterfeit manufacturers. Surprising for this study and its respondents, collectivism, a core value in Chinese culture, did not emerge as a significant factor in overall purchase decisions (Phau, Teah, 2009). What did emerge was the concern on the part of respondents that if it was found out that a given item was counterfeit, they would lose significant credibility and face in the community (Phau, Teah, 2009). Combined with the strong emphasis on integrity and ethics, the study underscores with greater clarity and convincing results just how powerful ethicacy is in defining if a person will buy a counterfeit product or not.

The limitations of this study include the lack of sampling and statistical precision based on the mall intercept methodology, and the fact that the majority of respondents were male. The mall in Shanghai is not representative of all shopping experiences in China, and the questionnaire and its use of imagery and descriptions lack clarity and precision needed for more extrapolative results. The study however does underscore the role of ethicacy as a key determinant in defining if a person is going to purchase a counterfeit product or not.

Analysis of Counterfeit Luxury Goods Online:

An Investigation of Consumer Perceptions

One of the most rapidly expanding selling channels for counterfeit products are websites and e-commerce sites. On the Internet a counterfeiter can be up and running within a day or less, selling counterfeit items globally using PayPal and other well-known payment processing systems to manage transactions. This area of counterfeit luxury products selling is the subject of the study Counterfeit Luxury Goods Online: An Investigation of Consumer Perceptions (Radon, 2012). The methodology is loosely defined as those customers who have purchased from known jewelry and watch counterfeit sites and have provided customer success stories in the past. The researchers reasoned that those who had participated in a transaction and had a positive experience (as evidenced by the endorsement) would be more likely to respond to their questionnaire. An online survey was created to determine the trade-offs that counterfeit purchasers had made in the purchasing process. The recruitment efforts netted out 47 total respondents, 40% who whom were men and 60% being women. The respondent's ages were between 18 and 45 (Radon, 2012).

The study found that the most important factors that those who knowingly purchased counterfeit products where more concerted with conscious value and price and the implied prestige of the given item. The researchers also found that those who are most likely to purchase counterfeit products are also the most price-sensitive and seek out inelastic, commodity like pricing deals which clearly communicate the lack of value being purchased (Radon, 2012). It's as if the respondents are attempting to buy the brand as a badge of prestige with little care if the actual product will last and deliver functional value or not.