Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, and the Civil Rights Act of 1991, is the most important civil rights legislation in modern history of the United States. The Act of July 2, 1964 (Civil Rights Act of 1964), Public Law 88-352, 78 STAT 241, in eleven titles, enforced the constitutional right to vote, to confer jurisdiction upon the district courts of the United States to provide injunctive relief against discrimination in public accommodations, to authorize the Attorney General to institute suits to protect constitutional rights in public facilities and public education, to extend the Commission on Civil Rights, to prevent discrimination in federally assisted programs, and to establish a Commission on Equal Employment Opportunity.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in many more aspects of the employment relationship. It applies to most employers engaged in interstate...
The Act prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Sex includes pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions. It makes it illegal for employers to discriminate in hiring, discharging, compensation, or terms, conditions, and privileges of employment. Employment agencies may not discriminate when hiring or referring applicants. Labor Organizations are also prohibited from basing membership or union classifications on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
A review of the history of affirmative action since the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 suggests that what began as non-preferential actions to offset the consequences of racial discrimination moved toward a range of preferential actions that visited discrimination on non-minority citizens. Recent legal decisions suggest that American society does not favor the use of racial preferences. (Fullinwider…
REFERENCES: A LEGAL HISTORY OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy, vol. 17, nos. 1 & 2, Winter/Spring 1997, pp. 9-20
Allen, Patrick D. Understanding Federal Court Decisions Federal laws aren't applied as consistently as you might believe. HR Magazine, 12-01-1998.
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section VII. 4/23/02. Department of Labor. http://www.dol.gov/dol/oasam/public/regs/statutes/2000e-16.htm.
Chart of Cases. 4/23/02. Touro Law. https://www.tourolaw.edu/patch/Chart.html.
Ethics Social Responsibility and Ethics Evaluate Company Q's current attitude toward social responsibility. Company Q. has a negative attitude towards social responsibility. This is because it believes that there is the potential for fraud and losses. In this situation, the management feels they must proceed with caution. This is from a perception about these programs not producing any measurable results in comparison with their costs. Over the course of time, this will more
Ethics, Values, Social Responsibility Bailout of Banking Industry in United States Ethical Compliance by Banking Industry It is quite common in American history that government comes for the rescue of companies and organization in the time of financial crisis. General motors' acquisition was one such example where saving GM meant saving the nation. When Government takes measure for the welfare of any segment of the economy, it then becomes responsibility of the organizations
There is a good case to be made for focusing on externalities and seeking to manage all of them in a social responsible manner, especially as the world becomes globalized and the key success drivers become relationships and information. Works Cited: Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved May 16, 2010 from http://online.worcester.edu/external/evescio/Principles%20of%20Management/strategicplan.pdf Friedman, M. (1971). The social responsibility of business is to increase its
Social responsibility is subject of considerable debate. For not-for-profit organizations, their responsibility is defined by their mandate. Their donors set this mandate, or at least they accept it. It is actually not much different in for-profit entities, except that the general perception is that earning profit is not socially responsible, whereas the activities of not-for-profit entities are generally considered to be socially responsible. For a for-profit entity, there are two schools
Social Responsibility Corporate social responsibility Companies are facing increasing pressure from investors, consumers, and the society. For investors, they are required to increase profits while consumers and the society require them to be socially responsible. Scholars have studied corporate social responsibility for years and over the years, they have documented their findings concerning social responsibilities of corporations. Over the years, consumers have built the typology of unresponsive to highly responsive purchasing in
Social Responsibility Types of people who live in the community in regards to the overall type of individuals who live within the community, the demographics vary considerable. However, the underlying values and principles that govern the population remain relatively homogenous. For one, many of the individuals on the base are military oriented or have some affiliation with the principles embedded within the military. The virtues of honor, respect, integrity and so