Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
The refusal to extend the vote, as well as all of the other rights prohibited to ex-felons, really denies them the chance to begin their lives again as fully integrated citizens of their city, state and country. The irony is that while the disenfranchisement laws negate the application of some rights for the ex-felons, the laws don't negate other obligations that are a part of citizenship.
For instance, ex-felons who do take the initiative to become employed are still obligated to pay taxes even though they are denied the benefits usually attached to those duties. A good example would be the right to take part in the election of their congressperson and senators or to have a say on policies that will control their lives.
Wasn't it a couple of hundred years ago that we fought some kind of minor skirmish over taxation without representation?
We push ex-felons to the margins of our society by restricting many of the rights and functions of citizenship that their neighbors have. It is not an excuse to say that, by pushing them out, we leave them few options, except perhaps illicit activities, which will start the cycle all over again.
Alex Friedmann, an ex-felon, said it best: "If society doesn't care enough about former prisoners to treat them as citizens, with voting [and other] rights of citizens, then why should former prisoners care enough about society to act like law-abiding citizens" (Mitchell, 2004, para. 11).
Communities are impacted too. Unfortunately, there are many ex-felons living in communities today -- more than we might guess (Remember, one out of forty-one adults). To deny them the right to vote, for instance, diminishes the community's elective power. Also, a neighborhoods' power...
For many reasons, it is this group that suffers the brunt of our system of laws. And, since the jury pool cannot have true representation of their peers because the law doesn't allow it, are they truly getting "due process?"
Andrew Shapiro (The American Prospect, 1997) argues that "disenfranchising ex-felons who have served their time and paid their debt to society is indefensible under even the most punitive theories of criminal justice." It is, in a sense, cruel and unusual punishment.
Bibliography
Felony disenfranchisement. (n.d.). Retrieved May 21, 2009, from Sentencingproject.org: http://www.sentencingproject.org/IssueAreaHome.aspx?IssueID=4
Mauer, M. (2000). Felon voting disenfranchisement: A growing collateral consequence of mass. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 248-51.
Mitchell, S.D. (2004, December). The new invisible man: Felon disenfranchisement laws harm communities. Retrieved May 21, 2009, from bad.eserver.org: http://bad.eserver.org/issues/2004/71/mitchell.html
Sentencing project. (2008, September). Felony disenfranchisement laws in the United States. Retrieved May 21, 2009, from Sentencingproject.org: http://www.sentencingproject.org/Admin/Documents/publications/fd_bs_fdlawsinus.pdf
Bibliography
Felony disenfranchisement. (n.d.). Retrieved May 21, 2009, from Sentencingproject.org: http://www.sentencingproject.org/IssueAreaHome.aspx?IssueID=4
Mauer, M. (2000). Felon voting disenfranchisement: A growing collateral consequence of mass. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 248-51.
Mitchell, S.D. (2004, December). The new invisible man: Felon disenfranchisement laws harm communities. Retrieved May 21, 2009, from bad.eserver.org: http://bad.eserver.org/issues/2004/71/mitchell.html
Sentencing project. (2008, September). Felony disenfranchisement laws in the United States. Retrieved May 21, 2009, from Sentencingproject.org: http://www.sentencingproject.org/Admin/Documents/publications/fd_bs_fdlawsinus.pdf
The right to vote is one of the fundamental rights of every American as entrenched in the U.S. Constitution. However, millions of Americans have been stripped of this right with many being denied this right for the rest of their lives. One of the groups that have been stripped of the right to vote is convicted felons. Most of the existing state laws bar convicted felons from voting even after
, et al., 2012). Systems approaches look towards the functional integration of different stakeholders and their goals towards a specific issue or path. What implications might a proposed solution have and to what groups? What is the functional relationship between groups of stakeholders and how can that be maximized. For returning felons, this approach looks at ways to construct programs that are utilitarian in context (the greatest good for the greatest
Even in the 2008 general election, which had widely-touted voter turnout, a number of eligible people did not vote. Michael McDonald engaged in a complex study, which not only looked at people in the population who were age-eligible for voting, but also looked at the number of people who were not otherwise disenfranchised, such as felons or foreign nationals. He found an overall turnout rate of truly eligible people
criminal justice and American culture. Specifically it will discuss jail time served by Blacks, Hispanics and whites, and the lawyers who prosecute them. The statistics indicate that African-American men, especially between the ages of 25 to 29, are incarcerated at a higher rate than either Hispanics or whites. There are several factors that are associated with these statistics, including where these young men grow up, their income, and their
Inhalants refer to the ordinary household products that are sniffed or inhaled by individuals so as to get high. There are many household products that are misused as inhalants. Some of these products include gasoline, hair spray, fabric protector, air conditioner fluid, nail polish remover, and correction fluid, propellants in aerosol, cleaning fluids and cooking spray. These products are mainly bagged, sniffed, snorted so as one to get high. They
Crime The current designation of the major categories of crime in the U.S. can be traced to England following the Norman Conquest in 1066. Prior to this period the Church was the primary regulator of morality, but over time the Church began to lose control over the lives of people and the local governments began making regulations (Dworkin, 1978). After 1066 Henry II institutionalized law throughout England in order that it