Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Herrera v. Collins
The findings and aftermath of the Herrera v. Collins case are often pointed to the Eight Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. However, there are Fourth Amendment implications as well. Indeed, Herrera was facing charges and conviction for the murder of two police officers. Based on eyewitness testimony and an admission, he was later convicted. However, about ten years later there was an appeal based on the claim that there was new evidence and that the defendant's late brother was the actual assailant. A temporary stay was granted but was later rescinded and Herrera was executed.
Facts
In two separate but close-together incidents, two police officers were killed by a man that was later identified to be Herrera. Added to a handwritten letter that ostensibl admitted guilt and some circumstantial evidence, Herrera was convicted. There was an appeal right after the conviction that fell short and the conviction was upheld. A second habeas request was later issued as a last ditch effort to stop the execution.
Issue
The basis of the second habeas brief was that new evidence had surfaced and that executing Herrera would be a violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Namely, this second...
As such, the temporary stay of his appeal was taken off and he was eventually put to death.
Dissent
The dissent in the Herrera v. Collins case, voiced by Blackmun and concurred with by Stevens and Souter, asserted that just the possibility of an innocent person dying or serving jail time for a crime he/she did not commit was reason enough to allow for a new trial or further consideration. The dissent asserted that even if the constitutional muster of a conviction was passed, that an appeal based on new evidence should be allowed.
Case Significance
The aforementioned Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments come into play here. However, another amendment that comes up quite easily is the…
Stop and Frisk In theory, a stop and frisk is "A brief, non-intrusive, police stop of a suspect." (Legal Information Institute, N.p.) These detentions can comply with Fourth Amendment standards under very specific circumstances. "The Fourth Amendment requires that the police have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed before stopping a suspect. If the police reasonably suspect the person is armed
Fourth Amendment The United States, as a society, is based upon principles of which other nations in today's world can only dream. Most Americans are proud to admit their heritage, their citizenship, their identity. This "americanness" is fostered by various values that we hold, as well as by the documents that have literally formed our country. One such document is the United States Constitution, amended by the Bill of Rights. The amendments
Fourth Amendment to the Constitution covers the protection of the individual from unlawful searches and seizures when in the privacy of their own home. Because of the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement officers are required to secure an official court order or warrant to search the premises, and that warrant must be based on probable cause. Although the Fourth Amendment does protect against the intrusion onto private property, there are several exceptions
Kentucky v. King Case: Kentucky v. King (2011) Facts: In Lexington, Kentucky the police were following someone who they believed was a known crack dealer into an apartment complex. Outside of the apartment door, they smelled marijuana smoke. The officers knocked on the door and announced their presence. After this occurred, they heard the people inside moving around. This sounded like they were in the process of trying to destroy evidence. The
Both the U.S. Senate and the U.S. Congress are slowly coming to the realization that they will have to address this issue which the Bush administration left behind to muddy the waters of citizen privacy rights in combination with the cases that are presently awaiting an appeal in the appeal courts throughout the United States due to violation of their rights to privacy during search and seizures arrests. Bibliography Panetta, Toni
4th Amendment's evolution and history, together with the "search and seizure" law. 4th Amendment Background People's rights of being secure in personal effects, papers, houses and persons, against unreasonable seizures and searches, may not be breached, nor shall any warrants be issued, but in case of probable cause, which is supported by affirmation or oath, and describes, particularly, the place that must be searched, or the things or individuals that should