Freemasonry's influence on Russian rulers before 1917
This 15 page paper discusses the impact made by the Freemasons in Russia. It also covers the Freemasons overall philosophy and changes in history that were attributed to the group. The paper focuses primarily on Peter the Great, Catherine the Great, and Alexander II and discusses the suspected changes that these leaders made that are attributed to the ideals of the Freemasons.
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
Freemasonry in Pre-1917 Russia
Free Masonry in Pre-1917 Russia
The Freemasons were a movement founded in Europe in the 1300's, although freemasonry did not enter Russia until much later. The founding philosophies of the group encompassed ideals including scientific discovery, intellectualism, and deism. Although there have been some unofficial sects that permitted women members, the group has been predominantly male. While most associate the Freemasons with numerous governmental conspiracy theories, the reality is that the group existed to further education, enlightenment, and prosperity among the people. Members of freemasonry across the globe have historically included men from royalty, aristocracy, military, and even occasional tradesmen. While many of the conspiracy theories about the group are simply legend, the Freemasons have been responsible for many changes and advances throughout the course of history.
Unlike other groups at the time, freemasons were neither religious extremists nor enlightenment enthusiasts. As argued in Walter Moss's a History of Russia:
They viewed God not as a personal being who answered daily prayers, but as the great lawmaker or "divine clockmaker," who created a marvelous clock (the universe) that would run perfectly if mankind just discovered and applied its laws… they were critical of intolerance that had often accompanied them and were sympathetic to the secularist idea of separating church and state.
It was these particular principles along with the group's overall distain for illogical non-progressive ideas that often got them into trouble with various rulers.
Introduction to Russian Society
Freemasonry did not enter Russia until the seventeenth century as a result of Ivan the Terrible's expansion of trade. Prior to Ivan, Russia had remained a closed and isolated country that did not trade or interact with the rest of the world. During Ivan's rule, the boarders of Russia were expanded and ports opened. While some countries, such as Germany, did not trust the king due to his arrest of some tradesman, he did make much successful progress with England. During his rule, England gained nearly exclusive trade rights with Russia, opening Russian ports to foreign trade and influence. In fact, it was directly the result of the newly opened ports that brought freemasonry into Russia (Hosking, 117). As the ports opened, military and aristocracy from other countries, especially England, entered Russia seeking both asylum and a fresh start (Wolffin, 82). While there are not any known activities that occurred by the hands of the freemasons at this time, it is well-known that there was already an established Freemason membership by the end of Ivan's rule. The reason that this assumption can be made is the influence that the Freemasons had on the next ruler, Peter the Great.
Peter the Great
Peter the Great was a dual successor to the throne of Russia. For the first part of his rule, he ruled alongside his half-brother who was mentally unable to actually rule himself. At his half-brother's death, he took over the throne (Riasonovsky, 214). During his reign, many of his actions offended the aristocracy, but forced the culture to westernize. Some of his more famous actions included requiring that Russian nobility shave their beards and eliminating arranged marriage entirely, arguing that it resulted in domestic violence as the spouses typically distained one another. This desire for westernization is exactly why many historians point out and strongly believe that Peter the Great was an active member of the Freemasons. According to early writings, he was influenced by Sir Christopher Wren of England to join the society and the result was the start of his campaign to educate and instruct the people of Russia. In fact, there are reports that Peter the Great may have given the Masons a building to use for their first official lodge in Russia.
Peter the Great's advancements of his country brought many foreigners to the ports of Russia. According to records found in Moscow,
Accompanied by the advances in commerce and aided by external political events, like the Jacobite rebellions, Peter the Great's reforms (and his trip to Europe) initially, fostered the increase in contacts between Europe and Russia in the first decades of the century and contributed to the influx of foreign population in Russia. At the early stages of the development of Freemasonry in Russia, ports became the first and the main centers of Masonic activity. In fact by 1710, Russia had replaced Sweden along the whole stretch of the Baltic coast from Riga to Vyborg and gained control of the Northern trade. The commercial treaty of 1734 provided a steady flow of northern raw materials to Great Britain from Russia and of Western manufactured goods from Britain to Russia, and Britain became Russia's main trading partner. British Trade Companies Narva. Estimations made by a.V. Demkin. (Moscow: Rossiiskaiia Akademiia Nauk, Institut Rossiiskoi Istorii, 1988)
Through opening up commerce and improving the overall wealth of his people, he was also able to improve their education and knowledge of the world. Along with this influx was an increase in the amount of Masonic activity within Russia. According to historical records of the Masonic order there were at least 3,000 active Mason members under Peter's rule and this time period saw the greatest increase of working Russian citizens to enter the ranks of the Masons.
During the reign of Peter the Great, Russia and Europe was exiting the Enlightenment era. This era, while inviting in new ideas of education and experience, also brought with it new premises within the Church that resulted in much disagreement and conflict among monarchs. This is one issue that the Freemason's fingerprint can be seen in influencing. In fact, according to historians, there are numerous Freemason publications challenging and questioning the church (Wolffin, 82). These publications, are in agreement with the actions of Peter the Great, who during the later part of his reign reformed the Russian Orthodox Church where he even refused to name a successor to the church in order to instead establish what became known as the Holy Synod, a council of ten clergy members who from that point forward ran the church (Dmytryshyn, 18).
Another example of Free Mason influence during Peter's reign was his transformation and modernization of the Russian military. Whereas prior to Peter's reign, the military was entirely Russian based, under Peter the Great, the military became transformed, bringing in leaders from Britain. These influences are especially noted in the Russian Navy:
By recruiting from sixty to as many as five hundred British subjects to enter Russian service as naval captains, lieutenants, bombardiers, shipbuilders, smiths, and gun-founders on his visit to Britain, Peter made a major contribution to the development of the Russian navy, creating the foundations, at the same time, for the beginning of the long-standing tradition of the British presence in the Russian navy, many of whom, were Freemasons. The estimates of how many British navy specialists Peter recruited vary widely. (Cross, 37)
So, once again, Peter the Great saw a need within Russia to modernize and improve his forces. Instead of turning to leaders within Russia, he turns to his fellow Freemasons from Britain and chose to learn from the strongest navy in the world.
This growth and use of the Freemasons continued and their numbers grew even greater thanks in part to the support of political leaders during this time.
In the end Russia greatly benefited from the reverence of Peter III towards Frederick of Prussia, who, as it was widely known at the time, was a Freemason himself. Imitating Frederick the Great, Peter allegedly patronized the brotherhood and gave a house in St. Petersburg as a gift to the lodge of Postoianstva (of Constancy) that worked in St. Petersburg and its suburb Oranienbaum since 1762. It is often assumed that Peter III not only sympathized with Freemasonry but also was a Master at a lodge in Oranienbaum (probably, the lodge of Constancy). This story is indirectly supported by the reference to Peter III's involvement with a lodge in Oranienbaum by Volkov, Freemason and Peter's confidant. Volkov was questioned by Catherine II's orders to find out "who during the reign of the previous monarch was with him in the Masonic lodge and what is the aim of this sect disagreeable with God and where are the printed books and who is known to him as a member of this sect." Andrei Bolotov (1738- I 833) was a naturalist, writer, an educator, and the founder of the Russian agricultural science. Because of his impeccable German, during the Seven Y ears ' War he was sent to Konigsberg to the Chancellery of the Russian Governor of the East Prussia. He worked closely with General Lieutenant Baron Korff, whom he mentions as the connecting link between Friedrich and Peter III in the Masonic affairs. Bolotov stayed in East Prussia from 1758 until 1762. In his memoirs, he repeatedly stressed that his experiences in the Baltic Sea provinces and the interactions with their German inhabitants played decisive role in his lire. Later, during 1776- 1796, he managed the Bogoroditsk region. Active participant of many intellectual activities, founding member the Free Eeonomic Society and editor and publisher of the Country Dweller magazine, Bolotov contributed to the Economic Magazine published by the leader of Moscow Freemasons and his one-time friend N.I. Novikov. It is not clear whether Bolotov himself was a Mason, but he certainly personally belonged to the same social circles as many leading Freemasons in Russia. In his Entsiklopediia, 128, 990, Serkov mentions Bolotov as a possible member of the Konigsberg military lodge of Joanna Krestitelia (John the Baptist) working in Elagin's system around 1773. (Cross, 105)
The Freemasons continued to grow and improve Russian society until the death of Peter III, when his wife Catherine took over the throne. During the reign of Peter III, the numbers and lodges grew substantially and it became fashionable in Russia to be a member of the Freemasons. In fact, many nobles from other countries were traveling to Russia to be a part of the new and growing movement.
Alexander II
While freemasons were not given the same government endorsement that they had received under Peter the Great, they were also no longer actively hunted out and instead were permitted to meet and act, so long as their actions were peaceful. Alexander II was a very modern ruler who desired to pull Russia into the manufacturing and goods era that existed at the time. In order to do this, his first prerogative was to determine the necessary actions to take with the Serfs. Under previous kings, Serfs became tied to their land. They were not permitted to travel elsewhere and had to produce a certain required amount of farming goods annually. This kept the class of people poor and enslaved to their particular landlords. Alexander saw the abject poverty of this class and the futility of forcing so many citizens of Russia to do nothing but farming and decided to do something about it.
While not known for certain, this decision and many of Alaxander's late decisions as ruler were said to have been influenced by the Masons. Being a Mason himself, Alexander would hold to the same values as his fellow Masons for freedom and modernism of the people of Russia. In fact, had Alexander not been assassinated, he was to release a new Parliamentarian government for Russia, which would have completely modernized the Russian government and could have prevented the later overthrow (Radzinsky, 413).
Alexander had many other modern ideas that lead scholars to believe that he was actively learning and engaging with the Mason leaders at the time. Among these practice included are the elimination of capital punishment, the creation of serf committees in those areas less willing to eliminate their serfs entirely, and an attempt at making peace with the revolutionaries in Russia at the time.
Napoleonic Wars
The Napoleonic War, like many political wars, was an antecedent of everything that freemasonry stood for and hoped to accomplish. The entire purpose of freemasonry was to modernize the world in a way that countries got along and worked together to further science and invention. As a result, the Napoleonic wars revealed the true nature of the Freemasons at the time, who were forced to fight for whichever country they were currently residing. This meant that many of the French soldiers under Napoleon's command were British or Russian. Because of this, the masons in agreement with the British government passed a decree to protect fellow masons during the war and treat the prisoners of war fairly. According to this law:
whereas the commissioners for conducting His Majesty's transport service and for the care and custody of French officers and Sailors detained in England have been pleased to grant…leave to reside in…upon condition that he gives his parole of honour not to withdraw one mile from the boundaries prescribed there without leave for that purpose from the said Commissioners, that he will behave himself decently and with due regard to the laws of the kingdom, and that he will not directly or indirectly hold any correspondence with France during his continuance in England, but by such letter or letters as shall be shown to the agent of the said commissioners under whose care he is or may be in order to their being read and approved by the superiors, he does hereby declare that having given his parole we will keep it inviolably.
Notice is hereby given
That all such prisoners of war are permitted to walk or ride on the great turnpike road within the distance of one mile from the extreme parts of the town (not beyond the bounds of the parish) and if they shall exceed such limits or go into any field or cross-road they may be taken up and sent to prison, and a reward of ten shillings will be paid by the agent for the apprehending them. And further that such prisoners are to be in their lodgings by 5 o'clock in the winter and 8 in the summer months, and if they stay out later they are liable to be taken up and sent to the agent for such misconduct. (Williamson, 2006)
It was actions such as these during the time of the Napoleonic war that kept the freemasonry movement alive and aided in keeping everyone's focus on the important issues outside of the war. According to reports during this time, between the years of 1810-1812, 462 French non-mason officers broke their parole and escaped back to France. During this time, however, not a single freemason left their parole, thus honoring the treaty and avoiding an inconsequential and pointless war.
Masons and Enlightenment
Contrary to popular belief, the freemasons were not predominantly enlightenment based. Rather, there are numerous publications by freemasons that criticize numerous enlightenment theories. It is said that it is the Freemason's criticism of the ideals that resulted in a movement toward Romanticism and away from enlightenment.
There is, however, one enlightenment ideal that was prominent in Mason literature; that is the ideal of liberty. On that same note, Masons were passive by nature and did not actively stir up revolutions or cause violence. According to Davidson, a Mason scholar, liberty philosophers such as John Locke and Benjamin Franklin were among those who presented the ideals of liberty in their writings in an attempt to educate the rulers of the time and transform their way of ruling their nations.
The Mason ideal of liberty, however, can be better seen in the peaceful actions of Mason rulers throughout history. For instance, under Peter the Great's rule, conflicts with the other Baltic provinces were ended and longstanding friendships entered into as a result of the leaders all being Masons. Additionally, during Alexander II's rule, the idea of liberty was quickly spreading so Alexander made the decision to free the serfs in a way that ensures no bloodshed whatsoever. The goal and purpose of the Mason's philosophies was that of peace.
Conclusion
The ideals of freemasonry, while not solidified until the 19th century, were clearly ingrained in Russian history. Freemasons sought to modernize the world and eliminate the hostilities that often led nations into wars and people into poverty. Although there are many conspiracy theories that the freemasons had their hands in various wars and revolutions, the actual historical documents prove otherwise. In fact, by all accounts, the freemasons did just the opposite by educating and modernizing Russia.
Many of the key influences the Masons had on Russia can clearly be seen by those leaders most ascribed with greatness. Under Peter the Great, merchant trade began and treaties were signed with long-standing enemies who also happened to be Masons. Peter eliminated the power of the church to wreak havoc at the decision of one person and replaced it instead with a council, allowing a balance in all decisions made by the church. Under Catherine, following the influence of her predecessors, Russia established international treaties and further opened trade. Even as late as Alexander II, the freemason's philosophy of liberty can be seen in his actions to free the serfs. In fact, unlike the emancipation that happened in the United States around the same time, the freeing of the serfs happened with no bloodshed and much success.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.