Geography Copenhagen - Cop15-15th United Essay

PAGES
5
WORDS
1673
Cite

This has been a model of decorum and progress compared with what the world saw unfold at the climate talks (Sarwar and Chesterman, 2009). One country in particular that did not come away from Copenhagen 15 with any warm and fuzzy feelings was that of Canada. Canada's once good reputation as an international leader has been seriously damaged because of its repeated failure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). While many of the COP 15 countries have successfully managed to reduce emissions since 1990, Canada's GHG emissions have increased 26.2% over the same period (Elston, 2009). Canada has never before seen its international reputation sink so low, with environmental groups and officials from many countries accusing Canada of obstructing an urgently needed world treaty on climate change (Lalonde, 2009).

Most feel that Copenhagen 15 was a failure. There seemed to be more fighting and bickering going on than true progress. The fact that they finally agreed on the accord was a small step in the right direction. Although there was nothing in it that was legally binding it does give them a foundation from which to work once they reconvene next year. In the future though it there is going to be any true progress made they are going to have to stop fighting amongst each other and really focus on the issues that are before them. It is not like they have forever to figure these things out. With each passing year that nothing...

...

(2009). Retrieved January 23, 2010, from tcktcktck
Web site: http://tcktcktck.org/events/major-moments/cop-15-copenhagen-climate-conference

Decisions adopted by COP 15 and CMP 5. (2009). Retrieved January 23, 2010, from UNFCC

Web site: http://unfccc.int/meetings/cop_15/items/5257.php

Elston, Suzanne. (2009). COP 15, Canada and Climate Change. Retrieved January 24, 2010,

from Toronto Sun Web site:

http://www.torontosun.com/life/greenplanet/2009/12/04/12046891-sun.html

Lalonde, Michelle. (2009). Last days in Copenhagen (COP 15): Montreal honoured, Canada

shamed (again). Retrieved January 24, 2010, from The Gazette Web site:

http://communities.canada.com/montrealgazette/blogs/greenlife/archive/2009/12/16/last-days-in-copenhagen-cop-15-montreal-honoured-canada-shamed-again.aspx

Sarwar, Nyla and Chesterman, Sabrina. (2009). A 'Copenhagen Accord' emerges from the depths of despair -- success or failure? Retrieved January 23, 2010, from Climatico Web site:

http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/post/tag/obama/

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2009). Retrieved January 23, 2010,

from UNFCC Web site: http://unfccc.int/2860.php

Sources Used in Documents:

References

COP-15 Copenhagen Climate Conference. (2009). Retrieved January 23, 2010, from tcktcktck

Web site: http://tcktcktck.org/events/major-moments/cop-15-copenhagen-climate-conference

Decisions adopted by COP 15 and CMP 5. (2009). Retrieved January 23, 2010, from UNFCC

Web site: http://unfccc.int/meetings/cop_15/items/5257.php
http://www.torontosun.com/life/greenplanet/2009/12/04/12046891-sun.html
http://communities.canada.com/montrealgazette/blogs/greenlife/archive/2009/12/16/last-days-in-copenhagen-cop-15-montreal-honoured-canada-shamed-again.aspx
http://www.climaticoanalysis.org/post/tag/obama/
from UNFCC Web site: http://unfccc.int/2860.php


Cite this Document:

"Geography Copenhagen - Cop15-15th United" (2010, January 24) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/geography-copenhagen-cop15-15th-united-15606

"Geography Copenhagen - Cop15-15th United" 24 January 2010. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/geography-copenhagen-cop15-15th-united-15606>

"Geography Copenhagen - Cop15-15th United", 24 January 2010, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/geography-copenhagen-cop15-15th-united-15606

Related Documents

The deal was immediately criticized as anti-competitive by William Kennard, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, and by the Communications Workers of America, which represents some workers at both of the merged companies. But neither government regulators nor union bureaucrats will have the slightest impact on the latest merger. They have neither the power nor the desire to oppose the plans of the giant telecommunications monopolies. More substantial opposition