With a book of corporate lore than includes using rubber exercise balls for chairs and scrounging for computer parts on university loading docks, Google has today risen from those humble origins to become one of the largest Internet companies in existence. They specialize in search, tackling the longtime computing problem of finding meaningful information in an endless sea of data. They have built an empire around the high tech needle-in-haystack game, closing May 23, 2008 with a market cap of $172.5 billion.
Today, Google has hundreds of employees and offices in locations around the world in addition to its Silicon Valley headquarters. They continue to devise new ways to deconstruct and rebuild the search function to provide better access to the web's information.
The company derives almost all of its revenue from advertising and has been able to capitalize on growing trends in online advertising revenue. The company sees its competitive advantage in doing one thing well, and strives to do so by attracting and retaining the best talent in the world. Google has recently launched several new search ventures, and a charitable arm, Google.org.
Planning
Google's long-term goals at this point are still oriented towards improving its search function. Another long-term goal is to expand their advertising base. They are working to capture a greater flow of income from their existing core traffic.
After that, Google seems to have little sense of long-term strategic focus. They understand that their business is rapidly changing, and long-term planning often only refers to two or three years out. For example, the shifts in their competitive environment recently with the Microsoft purchase of Yahoo, which would have merged their two largest competitors. The proposed merger has now fallen through, again signaling a shift in the competitive environment. These kinds of drastic changes are constantly affecting their industry, so it is understandable that they have little sense of long-term focus.
If we take Google's long-term vision to be its long-stated overall corporate vision - which seems reasonable given that the company is only ten years old and that the industry remains in a constant state of flux - then they have a handful of core strategies that they are employing to achieve that. They continue to focus on advertising as a key source of revenue, and to that end have been constantly working to develop new technology in an attempt to capture more of the Internet's revenue streams.
Google is also working to continually improve their search mechanisms. They have in recent years diversified their search features to include such things as Google Earth and are working on an enhanced version of the image search, something which is requiring them to develop entirely new search algorithms.
They are also rapidly expanding their geographic focus as well. While they have developed a dominant market position in the English-speaking world, they have tremendous opportunity for growth in other parts of the world. This has lead to them setting up offices in countries across the globe, and included the controversial partnership with the Chinese government, which allowed them to operate but with censored search results.
Organizing
Google is organized along both geographical and functional lines. Geographical units are largely responsible for bringing Google to international markets. They operate in places as diverse as Israel, China and Korea, and are mainly a marketing arm. There are some issues with local languages that are addressed at these subsidiaries as well.
At the heart of Google's organizational structure are small, cross-functional project teams. These teams bring together people of varying expertise to work on key company projects. The bulk of the company's work is done through these teams, in particular with regards to the generation of new ideas and projects for the company.
In addition, employees are given time to take on their own projects, which could be individually or in teams. This relatively unsupervised time is granted under the principle of 70-20-10, wherein 70% of the worker's time is given to his or her main job, 20% to other related projects, and 10% to his or her personal pet projects. This encourages workers to not only seize the opportunity to develop their ideas but also to form their own teams, possibly putting together different skill sets in a unique way.
Controlling
Google's problem solving has always been creative. The company was born with a creative solution to an existing problem. Existing search technology was weak, and users struggled to get the most from the web. The search engines at the time were based around single massive servers. Google instead built a search system based around network PCs, and this proved not only faster but more efficient.
From that point, Google has always approach problem solving creatively. It is ingrained in the corporate culture. The company is operated in a manner that reduces barriers to creativity. For example, requisitions and approvals for projects occur in a very casual manner - it is not a matter of streamlining the approvals process so much as eliminating it altogether. Moreover, employees are encouraged through a variety of means to seek solutions on their own. The 10% of free project time is one example, and the lack of barriers is another. This means that employees are able to tackle whatever problem they feel capable of tackling, regardless of their experience level or position within the company.
This approach to problem-solving is facilitated by a policy of seeking, hiring and retaining the best employees in the world. This inherently demonstrates the value Google puts on diversity. The Google workplace puts value only on ability, with no other barriers. To place any further barriers of any sort would run counter to the corporate strategy of seeking the best.
Leading
Google manages conflict in an informal manner. The company does not appear to have a rigid system of internal conflict resolution. Employees work together to forge solutions to disputes, and there is a relatively high degree of workplace harmony.
Google also takes a proactive approach to conflict resolution by dealing with the root causes of workplace conflict. By empowering their employees to work on whatever project they are capable of regardless of status, they reduce the impact that political power can have on an employee's career, replacing it with an achievement-oriented focus.
Another proactive component to reducing workplace conflict is to create an environment that, while not stress-free, facilitates the reduction of stress. They also incorporate team-building strategies, from the high-end food at their restaurants to roller hockey games. In addition, the company treats its employees very well. This is less to reduce workplace conflict than to reduce defections to competitors but it serves the purpose nonetheless.
Google has managed change in the industry by staying to its focus and branching out slowly. They realize that the robustness of their search engine is their main source of competitive advantage, and that this source is not sustainable unless they continually improve it. As such, they have maintained their focus on search.
They have expanded their product offerings gradually over the years, adding new forms of search. This has allowed them to maintain their advantage in search. By maintaining a leadership role in one of the most critical Internet functions, Google has positioned itself as above the change in the industry. The changes in the Internet business have been rapid since Google's inception, but in that time Google has remained relatively stable, building upon existing competencies rather than trying to overhaul its business to suit the shifting winds of a fast-moving industry.
You’re 80% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.