Group Decision Making
The costs and benefits of group making, decision-making methods and refuting arguments
All groups require compromises to function effectively. And making compromises requires making concessions, as it should not feel like one party is the loser and the other party is the winner. Working in groups does not mean that the opinions of the many or the few must trample upon the skills and abilities of the other members of the group. The group's numbers and diverse abilities should generate more solutions to problems, and thus more effective problem-solving.
But once these diverse potential solutions are generated, effective decision-making steps are collectively required to assure that the best solution is arrived at and is agreeable or at least tolerable to all of the members of the group. A combined solution is often best, rather than merely selecting one solution above other solutions. Generating consensus seems best, although in larger groups with more polarized opinions, voting may be necessary. While allowing an authoritarian voice to hold final sway over what is done may be least desirable, it may be necessary in a very spread-out group with many areas of expertise, or if the leader bears the brunt of the responsibility for the project and has greater knowledge of the different organizational factors involved.
You’re 71% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.