Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Those who oppose gun rights argue that society suffers from violence already, and arming more people will only make the problem worse. However, this argument is misguided. As explained above, deterrence alone helps to reduce violent crime. Furthermore, gun safety classes and permitting requirements go a long way toward ensuring that only mentally sound, educated, and qualified individuals may possess a gun. Waiting periods are mandatory in many states, and serve to reduce the opportunity for would-be shooters to behave impulsively. Guns don't kill people; people kill people.
Finally, recent public shootings provide another argument for the right of average citizens to own and carry guns. While this line of thinking may be counter-intuitive, it makes sense to note that if, for example, teachers or staff at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado had be carrying handguns on that fateful day in 1999, they may have been able to prevent the needless deaths of so many young people. In a world...
In a public place, if a terrorist begins to fire randomly into a crowd, it would be useful for a gun-owning good Samaritan to shoot back and end the incident.
Many arguments exist for the ongoing acceptance of the personal freedoms guaranteed to Americans through the Bill of Rights. Owning handguns is an expression of personal liberty, and helps people defend themselves against a tyrannical government, a corrupt official, a criminal, or a mass shooter. This is an essential right for citizens in a Democratic society, and those who fear irresponsible gun behavior should channel their concern into increasing enforcement of existing laws and permitting requirements.
Those who oppose gun rights argue that society suffers from violence already, and arming more people will only make the problem worse. However, this argument is misguided. As explained above, deterrence alone helps to reduce violent crime. Furthermore, gun safety classes and permitting requirements go a long way toward ensuring that only mentally sound, educated, and qualified individuals may possess a gun. Waiting periods are mandatory in many states, and serve to reduce the opportunity for would-be shooters to behave impulsively. Guns don't kill people; people kill people.
Finally, recent public shootings provide another argument for the right of average citizens to own and carry guns. While this line of thinking may be counter-intuitive, it makes sense to note that if, for example, teachers or staff at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado had be carrying handguns on that fateful day in 1999, they may have been able to prevent the needless deaths of so many young people. In a world where anyone can get guns if they want to, making guns illegal would only make the problem worse by preventing innocent bystanders from defending themselves and interfering on behalf of others. In a public place, if a terrorist begins to fire randomly into a crowd, it would be useful for a gun-owning good Samaritan to shoot back and end the incident.
Many arguments exist for the ongoing acceptance of the personal freedoms guaranteed to Americans through the Bill of Rights. Owning handguns is an expression of personal liberty, and helps people defend themselves against a tyrannical government, a corrupt official, a criminal, or a mass shooter. This is an essential right for citizens in a Democratic society, and those who fear irresponsible gun behavior should channel their concern into increasing enforcement of existing laws and permitting requirements.
Right to Carry Handguns for Self-Protection: The right to carry handguns for law abiding citizens has been a continual social and political debate about the restriction or availability of firearms within the country. Actually, the right to carry handguns has developed to become one of the major controversial and intractable issues within the social and political environments in the nation. The main reason attributed to the development of this controversial issue
gun control, including counter arguments. Owning a gun is much more than just a statement about this country's Constitution and Second Amendment rights. Owning a gun is a measure of protection and freedom that illustrates the principles this country's founders created, and it is a right that Americans should not take for granted. Gun control is not a suitable method for controlling crime, and it has not been proven
Citizens Should Be Allowed to Carry Concealed Handguns First Paragraph Gun control laws punish the innocent. Second Paragraph Gun control laws lower the crime rate. Third Paragraph refutation paragraph Rough Draft - Citizens Should be Allowed to Carry Concealed Handguns Gun control laws are a hot topic of controversy. Currently, there is not enough legislation that supports the right for people to carry handguns. Thesis Statement) There should be appropriate legislation and laws passed to allow for citizens
Gun Control in the United States: A persuasive argument in favor of gun control The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." This brief statement has proven to be one of the most controversial sentences ever codified into law, perhaps because the situation which inspired it
Gun control is one of the most polarizing issues of our time. Because this is such a controversial subject, it is actually harder to make a coherent case -- others are arguing in circles, twisting facts to suit their agendas, and misusing statistics as a matter of routine. This does not mean that we cannot have a reasonable discussion about the subject of gun control, just that we seldom do.
Even when some people decided enough was enough, the authority figure would tell the 'teacher' that the full responsibility was that of the experimenter, the 'teacher' would not be responsible and thus the shocks continued. There is some basis to believe that people simply want to please others whom they believe to be superior to them. There is also the need to conform to certain group rules in order to