Quality of Care
The term "quality of care" in the healthcare world is not as straightforward as it may sound. It refers to, as might be guessed, the level of expertise, efficiency, and efficacy of medical care given in a specific instance or as a whole in a studied population over time. In this latter regard, quality of care means the overall improvement in and maintenance of health based on the resources (time money, technology, effort) expended. To me, quality of care means performing appropriate and advantageous procedures when and only when they are called for, and can be both viewed and measured as the efficiency of care -- the more effective a treatment is, especially as it uses fewer resources, the higher the quality of care being delivered.
The government has a public safety due to monitor the quality of care being delivered in this country, and it is their responsibility to ensure that care is safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, efficient and equitable (IOM 2009). Piper (2008) claims that "in the same way that food, shelter, and clothing are not rights, neither is health care" (pp. 10). While basically valid, this claim is disingenuous and actually self-defeating. While we might not have a "right" to any of these things, the government does provide food, shelter and clothing to those in need, and not just on an emergency basis (as is the case with health care). Health goes to basic security of life, and the government has an inherent duty to protect its citizen's lives.
You’re 81% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.