Human Resource Management is an exciting and dynamic industry. For one to be successful as an HR manager, one must be understand the current trends in HR Management. Heathfield (2010) suggests there are two trends an astute HR manager should be cognizant of. These are the focus on the "whole" employee (rather than a person merely filling a position) and worker choice. The focus on the whole person is not new in Healthcare nor is it in Education (Jensen, 2008). It is interesting to note that HR Management, at least in the literature, is noting the importance of meeting the needs of the whole employee. Insofar as worker choice, this trend suggests that workers feel even more disenfranchised by the economic downturn of the past few years, and recognize that his or her livelihood rests with a proactive, entrepreneurial spirit. Heathfield suggests that today's workers recognize that they can be let go in a Nano-second and that employment options are to actively sought (even when one is employed).
Performance Management and Performance Evaluations
Performance evaluations have been used and abused for so long that Heathfield (2010) suggests that they should be renamed "Annual Assault" rather than Annual Review. Ideally, an Annual Review uses quantifiable, measurable objectives to identify employee strengths and weaknesses. The Annual Review process is tenuous, at best. If a worker performs "lower" or "worse" than the preceding year, it affects morale, productivity and the overall office environment (Heathfield). Moreover, supervisors often feel that a one-size-fits all tool is less than effective to measure employee effectiveness and improve performance (Heathfield).
Perhaps a more effective tool is the move to a Performance Management System. Performance Management is a system that fosters increased employee performance, improved morale and increased sales, profits and lower overhead (Cokins, 2009). The rationale and the implementation of Performance Management are simple in theory, but complex in execution. Heathfield (2010) suggests:
Define the purpose of the job, job duties, and responsibilities.
Define performance goals with measurable outcomes.
Define the priority of each job responsibility and goal.
Define performance standards for key components of the job.
Hold interim discussions and provide feedback about employee performance, preferably daily, summarized and discussed, at least, quarterly. (Provide positive and constructive feedback.)
Maintain a record of performance through critical incident reports. (Jot notes about contributions or problems throughout the quarter, in an employee file.)
Provide the opportunity for broader feedback. Use a 360-degree performance feedback system that incorporates feedback from the employee's peers, customers, and people who may report to him.
You’re 80% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.