The necessity and ethics of positive discrimination in modern society

Positive Discrimination -- Do We Need it?

For centuries, the global community has strived to eliminate discrimination against minority groups. For centuries, women had been emotionally and/or physically abused; they were prohibited from voting and working. Today, they are allowed to work outside the household, but they are still paid less than their male counterparts. Additionally, the responsibility of raising the children and completing the household chores remains heavily preponderant among the female categories.

The women represent one of the most obvious categories of people discriminated against; but they only represent a mere fraction of the overall population subjected to discrimination. And the grounds for the discrimination are multiple, to include anything and everything from gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, political and religious appurtenance, age or disability.

The modern day society is making intense efforts to ensure that discrimination is eliminated -- or at least decreased to the minimum level possible. Much still remains to be done, but positive results are obvious at all levels of discrimination battles. One important step in these battles was represented by the development and implementation of laws that protect the minority populations, which prevent and punish any act of discrimination. Still, aside from the actual laws, an important role is also played by the consciousness of the populations, revealed specifically at the level of ethical and moral conduct.

In light of the substantial evolutions made at the level of eliminating discrimination, a new situation is observed in which the community strives to compensate for the discrimination to which a specific category had been subjected in the past. Through this approach, the community will grant the individual merits based on their appurtenance to a minority group that had suffered discrimination in the past. This situation is know as positive discrimination, and the current project strives to assess whether it is necessary or not within the modern day society.

2. Discrimination and positive discrimination

In order to better discus discrimination and positive discrimination, it is first necessary to define the two terms. In this order of ideas, discrimination is generically understood as a situation in which the decisions made regarding an individual are made based on criteria that would not be normally relevant for the decision, such as religious appurtenance, gender, sexual orientation and so on. The lines below reveal some relevant definitions of the concept, as identified within the specialized literature.

"When economic differences arise because of irrelevant personal characteristics, such as race, gender, sexual orientation, or religion, we call this discrimination. Discrimination typically involves either (a) disparate treatment of people on the basis of personal characteristics or (b) practices (such as tests) that have an adverse impact on certain groups"

"According to UN Human Right Committee, discrimination is any distraction, exclusion, restriction or preference which is based on any ground such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other stats, and which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise by all persons, on an equal footing, of all rights and freedoms"

Positive discrimination is different from discrimination in the sense that it includes actions and activities aimed at compensating for the discrimination that had existed against the individual. It has a rather corrective nature, perceived as retribution for a wrongdoing of the past. Erika Ann Carr at the Western Michigan University states that positive discrimination is an affirmative action designed to:

"Remedy past discrimination, remedy present discrimination, […], eliminate discrimination and disadvantages, eliminate / prevent / reduce discrimination etc."

"Positive discrimination is a form of affirmative action designed to directly redress the disadvantage that groups of people have experienced in the past. It is based on the premise that justified discrimination is needed in some situations for disadvantaged people to have the opportunity to become equal within society" Making Multicultural Australia.

"Positive discrimination implies applying different criteria for selection to representatives of different groups as a way of addressing the existing social inequalities. It can be distinguished from positive or affirmative action which implies taking proactive steps to encourage certain groups to participate in the social, economic, and political life of a country"

3. The case of positive discrimination

Positive discrimination is derived from the concept of affirmative action, which basically refers to the effort completed by various members in the society to right the wrong done for specific categories of the population. While the specialized literature has yet to reach a universally accepted definition of positive discrimination, this is often perceived as occurring "through programs in employment, education, housing or electoral policy, [and] the core objective of this initiative is a commitment to fairly integrate traditionally disadvantaged groups into public institutions and processes"

During the 1960s decade, the American society had become focused on social programs that ensured federal support for various categories of the population. Disadvantaged groups of people were offered financial support by the government and a culture had been created around this trend. Still, the economy grew at rapid rates, and the problems of discrimination continued. Specifically, the advantaged category was represented by white males, and the disadvantaged categories were represented by women and other minorities. The advance of the economy created more opportunities for the advantaged category, while the state funds supporting the disadvantaged categories remained rather stable.

Gradually, the disadvantaged categories gained more and more access to employment opportunities. This was supported by all affirmative action, federal involvement through legislations of non-discrimination, as well as the development of the economy, which created more employment opportunities. Gradually as such, the gap between the advantaged and the disadvantaged categories widened and this was mostly due to the battles for affirmative action led within the workplace.

During the more recent years, the fights for affirmative action -- and as such positive discrimination -- were extrapolated from within the labour force scene into the educational domain, with increased presence in higher education. There are several intriguing dimensions of affirmative actions in higher education. For instance, universities and colleges are public institutions, meaning that the struggle and the results of affirmative action are out in the open, for the public to witness. Then, since the institutions for higher educational attainment are state owned, there is a question of whether or not the public money -- coming from all taxpayers across the country -- ought to be utilised in the struggles for affirmative action and positive discrimination.

Traditionally, the educational institutions were reluctant to employing affirmative action and positive discrimination as they strived to remain objective and not interfere in any political movement. These institutions strived to preserve their integrity and move away from any potential accusations of bias. More recently however, they came to the realization of a need for diversity within their campuses, and are using positive discrimination in an effort to increase this diversity among the students. At a specific level, several universities across the United States eased the access of minority groups of population to their educational programs, and this was unwelcome by the white population. In turn, the situations materialized in lawsuits filed by the white population, in which they argued that they had been discriminated against the minorities.

The rulings of the courts that presided the trials differed, and the dispute over the issue is far from being complete.

5. Jurisprudence on positive discrimination

Jurisprudence thinkers through time have approached the matter of discrimination and positive discrimination from various angles. John Stuart Mills for instance spent increased amounts of time studying the two genders. He concluded that there were no major differences between males and females that would explain the existence of different treatments of the genders.

"Therefore, women ought to have the same civil and political rights as men. Mill's argumentation is the historical basis for the concept of formal equality in the liberal tradition of ideas: seeing that there do not exist any actual, substantial differences between the sexes, neither that there do not exist any reasons to treat women in a different way from men."

In other words, the emphasis of Mills fell on the need to treat the gender equally, and not engage in either discrimination against women or positive discrimination in favour of women. While Mills has a rather straightforward approach to discrimination, Jeremy Bentham's discussion of discrimination reveals a more complex dimension. Bentham as such integrates the notion of relativity in the discussion of discrimination Bentham,

pointing out to the fact that it would be rather difficult to clearly state whether discrimination -- and more importantly, positive discrimination -- would be legal, illegal, moral or unethical.

Last, David Hume was an advocate of discrimination, in the meaning that he recognized the differences between various categories of population. He did not populate the dogma of treating people differently, but rather noted the existence of differences and recognized them. He believed that the awareness over the differences helped to increase the passion of human interactions, the successes related to various fields and overall motivation for the individual.

All in all, this review of the thoughts and perceptions of classical jurisprudence thinkers once again reveals the previous finding that positive discrimination is a complex concept, which can be perceived from two distinctive angles. On the one hand, it can be perceived as moral and acceptable, whereas on the other hand, it can be perceived as illegal and immoral. In the context described here however, the final conclusion is that positive discrimination is a form of discrimination nonetheless, and it is not necessary within the society. Merits should alone be granted based on performance criteria or other criteria as related to the project at hand, and features such as race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, age or disability should not represent criteria for the awarding of benefits, opportunities, distinctions and other such merits.

6. Conclusions

The modern day society is extremely evolved and developed, and this is obvious not only at the level of the technological advancements, but also at the level of social evolution. The contemporaneous society is marked by fights for equality and for more rights. The modern day workforce is for instance protected through a wide array of legal mechanisms, whereas the females are closer to gender equality than they have ever been. While much still remains to be done, the developments are undeniable.

In fact, the importance and emphasis on social equality has increased to such a degree, that in some circumstances, decision makers strive to compensate for the injustices of the past, with new measures. This course of action is generically referred to as positive discrimination, and it is a narrow part of the larger concept of affirmative action, through which the minority categories strived to ensure equal treatment.

Still, the enforcers of positive discrimination often fail to make the distinction between fairness and equality. They as such grant more rights to the minority categories of the population, in hopes to compensate for the discrimination to which these categories of the population had been subjected to in the past or in other instances of the present. In implementing this perception, the decision makers strive to promote fairness, but they disregard equality, which is the premise in all legislations addressing discrimination issues. From the standpoint of morality however, the issue is more complex and it can be perceived from both angles.

All in all however, it is concluded that positive discrimination is, in its essence, a form of discrimination, and it should not be encouraged within the society. The modern day population does not need positive discrimination and it should ensure that the merits are granted based on strict and objective criteria, rather than criteria such as gender, race or religion.

References:

Barnes, C., Disabled people in Britain and discrimination: a case for anti-discrimination legislation, (1991)

Bentham, J., Jeremy Bentham to his fellow-citizens of France, on houses of Peers and Senates, (1830)

Carr, E.A., Attitudes toward and knowledge of affirmative action in higher education, (2007)

Edwards, J., Batley, R., The politics of positive discrimination: an evaluation of the Urban Programme, 1967-77, (1980)

Emerson, R.L., Essays on David Hume, medical med and the Scottish Enlightenment: industry, knowledge and humanity, (2009)

Gasper, D., The ethics of development: from economism to human development, (2004)

Guillin, V., Auguste Comte and John Stuart Mill on sexual equality: historical, methodological and philosophical issues, (2009)

Gregory, R.F., Age discrimination in the American workplace: old at a young age, (2001)

Hellman, D., When is discrimination wrong? (2008)

Hoogensen, G., International relations, security and Jeremy Bentham, (2005)

Kearney, M.L., Women, power and the academy: from rhetoric to reality, (2000)

Jacobson, A.J., Feminist interpretations of David Hume, (2000)

Jordan, B., Automatic poverty, (1981)

Landy, F.K., Employment discrimination litigation: behavioral, quantitative and legal perspectives, (2005)

Middleton, D., Dealing with discrimination, (1999)

Mill, J., Mill, S.J., Bain, A., Finlander, A., Grote, G., Analysis of the phenomena of the human mind, (1869)

Numhauser-Henning, A., Legal perspectives on equal treatment and non-discrimination, (2001)

Roscigno, V.J., The face of discrimination: how race and gender impact work and home lives, (2009)

Samuelson, P.A., Economics, (1980)

Siebert, D.T., The moral animus of David Hume, (1990)

Smagadi, A., A sourcebook on international human rights materials, BIICL, 2008)

Smith, G.W., John Stuart Mill's social and political thought: critical assessments, (1998)

Parekh, B.C., Jeremy Bentham: critical assessments, Volume 1, (1993)

Tucker, R.B., Affirmative action, the Supreme Court, and political power in the old Confederacy, (2000)

Wang, L., Discrimination by default: how racism becomes routine, (2006)

Wennerlind, C., Schabas, M., David Hume's political economy, (Routledge)

Affirmative action, (The Free Dictionary by Farlex, 2012) http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Positive+discrimination last accessed on March 12, 2012

Positive discrimination, (Oxford Dictionary of Politics, quoted by Answers.com, 2012) http://www.answers.com/topic/positive-discrimination-1 last accessed on March 12, 2012

Positive discrimination, (Making Multicultural Discrimination) http://www.multiculturalaustralia.edu.au/hotwords/unpack/Positive.Discrimination last accessed on March 12, 2012

US anti-discrimination laws, (Program Development Associates) http://blog.trainingdiversity.com/u-s-anti-discrimination-laws / last accessed on March 12, 2012

Samuelson, P.A., Economics, (1980) 323

Smagadi, A., A sourcebook on international human rights materials, BIICL, 2008) 274

Carr, E.A., Attitudes toward and knowledge of affirmative action in higher education, (2007) 110

Positive discrimination, (Oxford Dictionary of Politics, quoted by Answers.com, 2012) http://www.answers.com/topic/positive-discrimination-1 last accessed on March 12, 2012

Tucker, R.B., Affirmative action, the Supreme Court, and political power in the old Confederacy, (2000) 17

Affirmative action, (The Free Dictionary by Farlex, 2012) http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Positive+discrimination last accessed on March 12, 2012

US anti-discrimination laws, (Program Development Associates) http://blog.trainingdiversity.com/u-s-anti-discrimination-laws / last accessed on March 12, 2012

Numhauser-Henning, A., Legal perspectives on equal treatment and non-discrimination, (2001) 144

Bentham, J., Jeremy Bentham to his fellow-citizens of France, on houses of Peers and Senates, (1830) 41

Wennerlind, C., Schabas, M., David Hume's political economy, (Routledge) 93