This paper looks at the rational choice theory and the biological trait theory. It looks at the elements of each of the theories and then compares and contrasts the two theories explaining their similarities and differences. It then describes improvements to the theories that would enhance them to eliminate their weaknesses.
¶ … Crime Causation
I uploaded material text choose theory unit 3, unit 4. Reference: Seigel L.J. (2011). Criminology: The core (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. Examine major theories crime causation. Use materials text / resources support crime occurs theories.
Sociologists and psychologists alike have over the years attempted to create theories that explain why people commit crime in the U.S. As well as the rest of the world. There have been several questions that have lingered in the minds of the scholars one of which has been on what the major theories reveal about the patterns of crime and how they contribute to tactics of combating crime. Crime is extremely complex and trying to explain it in a single theory is next to impossible. This is because crime ranges from the savage violent acts and the white collar crimes that are highly sophisticated. On the other hand, crime can be conducted by one person alone or by a highly organized syndicate of criminals. It is for this reason that even the most sophisticated of theories has failed to explain the existence of criminal behavior. Many criminologists have debated on their opinions of the analysis of crime patterns. However, none of these has helped to give proper efforts for crime prevention Siegel, 2012()
Choice theories
The rational choice theory states that behavior that leads to violation of the law is produced by careful thought and planning. Offenders usually opt for crime after they consider both the personal factors such as revenge, entertainment, money and thrills and the situational factors such as security measures, presence of police and availability of a target. Before the individual decides to commit the crime, they reason to evaluate the risk of getting apprehended, the severity of the punishment that is expected, the potential benefit or value of the crime, and the ability of the criminal to succeed. When the person deems that the risks of conducting crime outweigh the rewards, they decide against the crime. Same goes for those who feel they are likely to be arrested and that the punishment is severe Siegel, 2012()
Elements of the rational choice theory
Evaluation of the risks of the crime.
The first element of the rational choice theory is that the reasoning individual evaluates the risk of the crime. Here, the criminal selects their target carefully then behaves in a systematic and selective manner. The target is chosen based on their value, potential for resale, novelty price, etc. Their decision to commit a crime is made worse by the fact the promise that they can gain easily with extremely low chance of getting caught. Under this element, when the reward is perceived to be great, the risk small, and the excitement high, there is a higher likelihood of an individual to commit a crime Siegel, 2012()
Offense-specific and offender-specific crimes.
Theorists of the rational choice theory state that crime is both offender-specific and offence-specific. When the crime is offender-specific, the criminals engage in critical thinking and plan their antisocial behavior carefully. Before they decide to commit a crime, they decide what their personal needs are, the required skills and the prerequisites for them to commit the crime successfully. They assess their skills, immediate need for valuables such as money, legitimate sources of finances other than crime, resources required to commit the crime, fear of apprehension, availability of alternative crimes and their physical capability such as strength, health and dexterity Siegel, 2012()
In offense-specific crimes, the offender reacts to selective characteristics of the criminal act. The criminals consider the probability of security devices, effectiveness of police patrols, presence of occupants, escape routes, entry and exit points, and availability of a getaway vehicle Siegel, 2012()
Structuring criminality.
As a result of the in-depth risk evaluation and offender-specific and offence-specific crimes, there are other personal factors that lead to a person's decision to commit a crime. One is the economic opportunity or financial needs of the individual. When a person feels that they need money, they may embark on crime in order to get the money they so need. The second thing is an evaluation of personal traits and experiences. The personal experience of a criminal and their lifestyle are strong influences to a person's decision to conduct a crime. The expertise of a criminal also influences their capability and decision to commit a crime Siegel, 2012()
Structuring crime.
The decision of a person to commit a crime depends on their choice of place and the characteristics of the target. When a person feels that the location of the crime is ideal or that the target is easy and there is little risk of getting caught, they may choose to result to crime Siegel, 2012()
Trait theory
The biological trait theory states that the biological conditions of a criminal may control their human behavior. This theory asserts that it is through the traits of a person which are the personal characteristics that make each one of us unique and a social environment that influences their behavior. Through this human behavior, the person may make a choice of either conformity or crime. The theory states that the influence of certain chemicals and minerals is direct and leads to criminal behavior Siegel, 2012()
Diet
It is believed that by maintaining a healthy diet, a person is able to keep the optimum balance of minerals and chemicals in the blood to keep brain functioning and growth at a normal level. When a person has an improper diet, they have an imbalance of chemicals and minerals which leads to deficits in the cognitive and learning functions of the brain leading to antisocial behavior Siegel, 2012()
Hypoglycemia
When the level of blood glucose fall, the efficient functioning of the brain is disrupted which leads to sudden outbursts of antisocial and violent behavior. Many offenders have been found to have extremely high levels of hypoglycemia that is reactive Siegel, 2012()
Hormonal influences
An abnormal level of testosterone which is the most abundant androgen has been known to cause aggressive behavior. Also when males have abnormal levels of androgens, they often seek dominance and impulsivity. They also experience reduced verbal skills and changes in mood and behavior such as restlessness and anxiety. Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) in women also causes surges of hormones which may lead them to act in an aggressive or antisocial manner Siegel, 2012()
Exposure to lead
When exposed to lead, the emotional and behavioral disorders of a man become heightened. The criminals usually experience higher levels of lead in their bones that leads to mental illnesses which leads to has been linked to high levels of homicide Siegel, 2012()
Environmental contaminants
Research has shown that prenatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) leads to low IQ and short attention spans that are often seen to be risk factors for serious learning and behavioral problems. Exposure to air pollution also leads to severe cognitive defects and changes in the brain structure of healthy children. These affect their cognitive control, intelligence and leads to delinquency and criminality when they are adults Siegel, 2012()
You’re 80% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.