Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
S. Supreme Court and the Court has ruled that, in state cases, such verdicts are constitutionally acceptable (Coughlan, 2000). The Court ruled that justice could still be served with less than a unanimous jury verdict as long as the jury was composed of a group of individuals representative of a cross section of the community who have been free to deliberate and to do so free from outside intimidation.
In my opinion, the Supreme Court's decision in Apodaca v. Oregon (Apodaca v. Oregon, 1972) was decided with an eye toward expediency than justice. The logic behind the unanimous verdict is based on the sanctity of reasonable doubt and protecting the innocent and should be a sacred element of our judicial system. The decision in Apodaca was a compromise that violates our system's principles.
Mistrial/New Trial
A trial judge, either by common law or court rule, depending on the jurisdiction, has the discretionary power to grant a mistrial, thereby terminating an on-going proceeding or to order a new trial based on significant procedural or evidentiary error, serious misconduct of a party or counsel, or by the occurrence of an event that materially impairs a party the right to a fair trial. The declaring of a mistrial or the granting of a new trial is an extreme remedy that should be granted...
In such situation, a "hung jury" is declared and a mistrial is declared. In both criminal and civil cases, a new trial can be conducted.
New trial decisions become necessary when significant procedural or evidentiary errors occur in the trial proceedings. These pose serious obstacles to the proceedings proceeding in a fair manner and require the judge to take the extreme measure of terminating the trial and ordering that a new trial take place. Because of the time, expense, and inconvenience of this remedy, the action is taken very infrequently and courts are reluctant to take this approach. In most cases the court will attempt to exhaust other remedies prior to granting a new trial.
References
Apodaca v. Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 (U.S. Supreme Court 1972).
Coughlan, P.J. (2000). In Defense of Unanmous Jury Verdicts: Mistrials, Communication, and Strategic Voting. The American Political Science Review, 375-393.
Tiersma, P. (2001). The Rocky Road to Legal Reform: Improving the Language of Jury Instructions. Brooklyn Law Review, 1081-1091.
Judicial Process
The Jury System is the Only Way to Ensure JusticeOverviewIn jury trials, the key focus is usually on factual findings on the basis of the evidence laid bare by the trial�s parties. Towards this end, the jury not only lends its ear to the dispute, but also conducts an assessment of the presented evidence so as to come up with a decision founded on facts, and directed by the jury
They also had the power to decide the merits of evidence and arguments. In the 19th century, judges gained greater control over juries and the role of juries became what it is currently; hearing evidence presented on both sides and determining the guilt or innocence of the accused. The advantages of the jury system lie in the foundational elements articulated and supported by amendments and the Supreme Court. The Sixth
Enron Ethics The Enron/Arthur Andersen affair was perhaps the worst business and accounting scandal in the history of the United States. Indeed, Enron was engaging in a massive amount of malfeasance at all levels of the organization while Arthur Andersen, who was supposed to be an ethical and impartial third party, was at least partially in on the fraud. The circumstances were major as the power brokers for both firms paid
Jury Selection Process, Sequestration, Verdict and Relevant Controversies: OJ Simpson's case had already set the record for being the longest jury trial in the history of California even before the commencement of closing arguments. For a better part of the year, the jury in the case had been sequestered and was displaying signs of exhaustion and strain (Linder, 2000). Actually, Judge Ito was blamed for permitting the trial to drag on
The theory involving Christine being determined to put an end to Rhoda's life can be related to her ration intervening, influencing her to take action before Rhoda continued her killings. Rhoda pays special attention to the way that her mother sees her, and, even though she knows that her mother has the power to denounce her, she does not attempt to murder Christine. The next in Rhoda's list of killings would
Off the job training is implemented in a location different from the actual place of employment. The more common methods of off the job training include the day releases (through which the employees take the day off work to engage in the training program), distance learning, block release courses, sandwich courses or self-study. The main advantages of this method are that the quality of the results is increased, as the