This is particularly since Section 8.2 reads that employees will be recalled in order of seniority provided that they have the skill and ability to do the job required. At present, the Maple Leaf Company, along with the union, was forced, during the first round of negotiations the parties was forced to set aside the issues of contracting out and technological change. It might, if so much control was wrested away from its employment hiring in firing, forcing it to sacrifice quality at the expense of seniority, in order to stay afloat in the industry, feel a need to do so, as doing so will give itself more choice regarding the hiring and firing of quality employees. Such issues have been set aside to temporarily reach an agreement, but this does not mean that the issue will not come to the forefront later on, even though such issues bracketed for the...

The company cannot reward a good employee with more time for a particularly difficult or close loss, and it must give the same amount of time even if the loss of the individual was relatively distant and had a minor impact upon the employee's lifestyle. Lack of flexibility again would be an issue for the company, rather than the desire to inflict cruelty upon a…