Laws and Marriage Legal Marriage

Laws and Marriage

Legal marriage reform is essential to the social advancement of historically oppressed groups such as African-Americans, women, the lgbt community, religious minorities -- Mormons and Muslims. Different theorists have argued in support of reforms in the marriage of historically oppressed groups and minorities. One view is that historically oppressed groups have been in unjust and oppressed marriage hence the need for legal reforms. Because marriage has been essentially defined based on ethics, religion and legal perspectives, then it would be necessary to legalize marriage reforms for the neutrality of freedom. Different reforms can be legalized to conform to the establishment of marriage among historically oppressed groups.

Marital contractualization has been proposed as the first reform proposal. According to this provision, the institution of marriage would be left in the hands of private organizations and churches. These institutions would relegate agreements between spouses to comply with the law. This would help to eradicate any form of special legal marriage right or status. This state regulation of marriage contracts and marriage administration must be legalized among historically oppressed groups. Therefore, marriage must be based on informed consent, efficiency, diversity, and equality. Excess distribution of taxpayer money among historically oppressed groups has not been adequately justified. Similarly, there is no financial justification of sustaining stigma among minority groups through legal marriage.

However, new reforms should not eliminate marriage rights through private contracts. This includes privileges for immigration. A second reform proposal argues that the state should not replace domestic partnership or civil union with/or identifying others secular status. This will serve as a ground for identifying others for entitlement of benefits such as visiting rights. In addition, this would allow for equal treatment in marriage and reduce non-neutrality. Therefore, legal reforms would resolve the controversies surrounding marriages among historically oppressed groups. Because religious groups will be involved in this matter, they are likely to solve such controversies and conflicts.

Forms of marriage that should be legally banned

Gay marriage violates the sacred texts, traditions, and beliefs among many religious organizations. For this reason, it must be banned. The American Baptist Churches, Association of Evangelicals, United Methodist Church, Presbyterian Church, and the Catholic Church have all opposed same sex marriage. If marriage is expanded to incorporate, gay couples may encourage religious organization to marry same sex couples and schools will teach kids that opposite sex marriage is same as same sex marriage.

Marriage of children or underage girls has been closely linked to the increase in the spread of HIV / AIDS. The trend of men marrying young girls has been a condoned social norm. Therefore, it must be declared illegal based on the promulgation of the 2012 Children's Welfare and Protection Act. Evidently, the practice should be banned because of the conflicts with the provisions of the constitutional clauses. Old men marrying young girls who have just entered puberty are not a customary marriage. Although this has often been done, it cannot be tolerated.