Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Next I will respond to the accusation that I collaborated with other students on Question 3 in violation of the exam instructions which read, "Students may not work together." I assure the committee that collaboration with others for this exam was never a consideration for me for the following reasons. I imagine that many students will provide the same, even nearly identical responses because we have similar backgrounds, professional interests, experiences, and even writing styles.
One, I had no reason to consult with others because as a take-home exam, I had a wealth of information and ample time available to me to conduct research at the library or on the Internet. Moreover, I have proven myself to be a hard-working and successful student, one who would not need the assistance of others on a straightforward exam question.
Second, if I had needed or wanted to consult with others I would hesitate to use my fellow classmates as a reliable resource. Rather, I would much prefer the more valuable input from my place of employment: I work as a Nuclear Medicine Technologist and have access to many persons and resources there would be of far greater help than a fellow student would.
Fourth, the information I offered in response to Question 3 is entirely factual in nature and incorporates no personal opinion or analysis that would indicate clearly that I had colluded with others.
In conclusion, I feel strongly that Instructor Cameron has given me an "E" unfairly and without substantive proof of any wrongdoing on my part. I urge you to reconsider this case in light of this letter as well as the sources I am providing you in tandem. I truly enjoy studying at the Institute and have earned every mark I have received; as I am on the brink of graduation I look forward to representing IIT throughout my professional career. I trust that the committee will make a fair decision based on the evidence provided. Thank you for your…
Appeals Review Committee, Riverside, Office of Undergraduate Admissions, 3106 Student Services Building, Dear Appeals Committee Re: Transfer admission to UC campus for Fall 2012- (Write your Full Name here) I learned on [insert date] that I was denied transfer admission to UC campus for Fall, 2012. I respectfully request the Transfer Appeals Committee to reevaluate my application on the basis of the new information provided in this letter. Although I was never surprised when I received
How can we expect our children to learn how to think critically if we do not teach them about sex? Cheers to The Dallas News for pointing out the woeful inconsistencies and shortcomings in Texan state education. The majority of Texas school districts "either teach an abstinence-only health curriculum or avoid talking about sex altogether" and the result? Texas has one of the highest rates of teen pregnancy in the
However, I would be more careful about choosing the words and the metaphors that you employ to do this, because you have a tendency to use overly dramatic images that do not really fit the story that well. I also noticed that you do not provide a clear introduction that gives the reader a clear indication of the major themes and direction of your essay. You have described the
Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from Birmingham Jail" Martin Luther King Jr.'s letter from Birmingham Jail, which was written in April 16, 1963, is a passionate letter that addresses and responds to the issue and criticism that a group of white clergymen had thrown at him and his pro- black American organization about his and his organization's non- violent demonstrative actions against racial prejudice and injustice among black Americans in
Abstract Writing a Letter from Birmingham Jail analysis essay offers the student the gift of going back in time to the courage and ferocity of the Civil Rights Movement to examine one of the most eloquent documents of that era. The Civil Rights Era was one of the uglier periods in American history—and one of the most triumphant and inspiring. No document embodies this dichotomy as fully as King’s Letter from
Sir: I feel I must tell you that I was quite shocked and dismayed when I was notified of your decision to disqualify me for the position of deputy sheriff due to the use of alleged countermeasures during the lie detector testing. First, I would like to vehemently deny that I knowingly engaged in any activity designed to explicitly deceive the lie detector or the person operating it. Since it