Not of the Same Feather: Cultural Appropriation in The Invention of Wings
As problematic as it may be for a white Southern author to presume understanding of the psyche of a slave, Sue Monk Kidd embeds enough nuances in The Invention of Wings to make the fictionalized account of the Grimke sisters compelling and enlightening. Alternating between the voices of Hetty (Handful) and Sarah is the literary device Kidd relies on to demonstrate different perspectives and points of view, while also showing what Hetty and Sarah have in common too. In fact, Kidd shows how Sarah and Hetty develop the courage to rebel against social norms and even the law in order to make the world a better place. Symbolism also helps tie together the disparate worlds in which Hetty and Sarah live. Thick with symbolism related to the theme of flying and the freedom flight implies, The Invention of Wings also shows how gender and race intersect in oppressive, patriarchal societies. Setting is integral and indispensible in The Invention of Wings, a quintessentially Southern novel. Whereas the shift in point of view between the two main characters demonstrates their differences, symbols and setting illuminate the similarities between Hetty and Sarah.
Kidd capitalizes on the motif of slavery to as an overarching symbol of a more generalized oppression in The Invention of Wings. When Sarah first meets Handful, whose very nickname perpetuates her dehumanization, she has been complaining more about her longing to “escape the porcelain dolls,” the symbols of stereotypical girlhood, than about being trapped in a society that continues to buy and sell people (Kidd 8). Sarah then receives Hetty as a gift, as if Hetty too were just another doll, and suddenly Sarah’s humanitarian consciousness is awakened and she becomes determined to effect social change through her rebellion. Using Hetty almost exclusively to flush out Sarah’s character amounts to “cultural theft,” replete with the problematic perpetuation of stereotypes and the use of African American vernacular by an outsider (Grobman 10). Hetty exists mainly so that Kidd can paint a rosy picture of her white protagonist, even though the story does “present a cross-cultural female conversation,” (Grobman 10). Sarah dominates the cross-cultural conversation, even though Kidd’s opening chapter is told from Hetty’s point of view and Hetty of course features prominently throughout the novel. Hetty is not so much a character but an icon—the archetypal young domestic slave whose benevolent white mistress takes a liking to. If The Invention of Wings were not based on a true story, Kidd’s story would have represented unabashed cultural appropriation. As it is, the story does capture the real world struggles of those who become willing to make personal sacrifices to promote ethical goals.
Inventing wings, the symbolic act of subverting oppressive patriarchal and racist regimes, is the primary means by which Sarah and Hetty’s stories are tied together. Bird imagery also appears in ironic and subtle ways, such as when the Missus digs her fingernails into Hetty’s skin and Hetty imagines the marks look like “a flock of birds on my arm,” (Kidd 14). Indeed, this single sentence encapsulates Hetty’s character almost more than any other in the book because it shows how the stalwart young woman is determined to transform all the negativity in her life into opportunities for freedom and liberation. Other symbols Kidd uses in Invention include sewing and quilting: stereotypically female crafts. Sewing and quilting evoke imagery of threads: the symbolic threads that link together Sarah, Angelina, and Hetty. That sewing provides Hetty with a pathway towards self-empowerment and liberation is also meaningful, especially as her work coincides with Sarah’s own personal struggle to enter the male-dominated world of law and public policy.
Setting also aligns with the symbols in Kidd’s novel. Along with her previous novel The Secret Life of Bees, The Invention of Wings establishes Sue Monk Kidd as a Southern writer, whose “sense of place” is “metadiscursive” and therefore offers the “opportunity for negotiation and consensus” related to uniquely Southern themes and motifs like slavery (Romine 18). As a fictionalized historical novel, too, Kidd joins a number of authors in promoting general understanding of the extensive ramifications of slavery in the American consciousness, including the fact that neither whites nor blacks “developed its culture alone, but that each influenced the other,” (Wright 7). The antebellum south is characterized above all as a place of dichotomous social interactions, of strict hierarchies, and regimes of political and economic control. Black women would have been near the bottom of the social hierarchy in the antebellum south, whereas slave owning white women ranked near to the top in spite of Sarah’s keen awareness of gender disparities and social injustice. Gender is a thread linking together Hetty and Sarah. Fortunately, Kidd does not presume that Hetty and Sarah perceive their Southern worlds from similar vantage points, which is why the author uses the literary technique of switching points of view. Like fellow Southern author William Faulkner did in The Sound and the Fury, Kidd switches from each character’s perspective. Moving from Hetty to Sarah and back again gives the reader insight into their different impressions of the same Southern realities, their different worldviews, and particularly their different use of language. Hetty speaks in her own vernacular, while Sarah’s tone and diction are grounded in her milieu of Southern gentry. The technique still hints at the use of cultural appropriation: using Hetty as an instrument to highlight Sarah and her sister’s white guilt. Nevertheless, point of view does counterbalance the occasionally problematic use of setting and symbolism in Invention.
Neither Sarah nor Hetty are taken seriously in their respective worlds: two worlds that collide uneasily in the antebellum South. Each character must wield whatever resources she has at her disposal. Showing readers both Sarah’s and Hetty’s perspective, Kidd overcomes the tendency to appropriate African American experiences and also clearly differentiates between what Hetty endures versus Sarah. Both women recognize the potency of intersectional oppression, and both invent wings for themselves and posterity.
Works Cited
Grobman, Laurie. “Teaching Cross-Racial Texts: Cultural Theft in ‘The Secret Life of Bees.’” College English, Vol. 71, No. 1, 2008, pp. 9-26.
Kidd, Sue Monk. The Invention of Wings. New York: Penguin, 2014.
Romine, Scott. “Where is Southern Literature?” Critical Survey, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2000, pp. 5-27.
Wright, Donald R. “Recent Literature on Slavery in Colonial North America.” OAH Magazine of History, April 2003, pp. 5-9.
You’re 100% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.