Essay Doctorate 596 words

Toxic Leaders in the Military

Last reviewed: October 17, 2017 ~3 min read

Good leadership is an essential component in a military organization because of the complex nature of military operations. Such leadership is provided by good leaders with capability to adapt to rapidly changing situations in the operational environment. Some of the components that characterize good leadership in military operations and organizations include making quality decisions, creating a positive environment for all subordinates, analytical problem solving, and systems integration. In this regard, some of the core qualities military leaders should possess include intellect, presence, character, and ability. Even though the significance of good military leaders to successful operations is recognized in this field, there are toxic leaders who have negative impacts on military organizations.

Toxic leaders exist in military ranks and have negative impacts on the achievement of effective mission command. Reed & Olsen (2010) define toxic leaders as leaders who do not care for well-being of their subordinates and have personal or interpersonal techniques with negative impacts on organizational climate. Toxic leadership in military operations and organizations is characterized by subordinates’ belief and conviction that the leader is motivated primarily by self-interest. Toxic leaders in the ranks of the military utilize destructive leadership styles and techniques that generate a poor organizational climate and hinder organizational and operational effectiveness.

The negative impact of toxic leadership on operational and organizational effectiveness is attributable to the effect of these leaders on the human dimension of leadership. Toxic leaders affect the human dimension of leadership by being narcissistic. Doty & Fenlason (2013) contend that toxic leaders are selfish and self-serving individuals who destroy the motivation of subordinates and military units. This implies that toxic leaders affect the human dimension of leadership by focusing on their self interests at the expense of the motivation and well-being of their subordinates. Narcissism is considered as a critical and huge part of toxic leadership in the military since toxic leaders tend to have an exaggerated sense of self-importance and excessive preoccupation with themselves and their interests (Doty & Fenlason, 2013). During this process, toxic leaders show an apparent lack of concern for the motivation, interests, and well-being of their subordinates and units. Consequently, they end up affecting the human element of leadership since their personal success and satisfaction matters most in comparison to the overall success and effectiveness of the organization.

Since these leaders have considerable impacts on the effectiveness of military units, operations, and organizations, it is increasingly critical to identify and utilize suitable actions to counter their self-driven leadership styles and techniques. The first action towards countering toxic leaders is establishing a system of supervision through which toxic leadership behavior in military units is detected and addressed by the organization’s top leadership. For example, the top management should conduct climate assessments and 360-degree feedback to identify toxic leadership behavior and address it (Reed & Olsen, 2010).

Secondly, the actions of toxic leaders can be countered through providing executive coaching that is centered on behavior modification (Reed & Olsen, 2010). While such training has received minimal attention within the military, it would help in dealing with toxic leadership in military organizations. The executive coaching for behavior modification should be centered on emotional intelligence training, which provides a framework for toxic leaders to focus on others (subordinates) rather than being self-driven (Doty & Fenlason, 2013). For example, emotional intelligence skills enable toxic leaders to learn how to interact with their subordinates and make sound decisions for the benefit of their units and organizations.
References
Doty, J. & Felanson, J. (2013). Narcissism and toxic leaders. Military Review, 93(1), 55-60.
Reed, G. & Olsen, R. (2010). Toxic leadership: Part deux. Military Review, 90(6), 58-64.

You’re 100% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2017). Toxic Leaders in the Military. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/toxic-leaders-in-the-military-essay-2168650

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.