¶ … Madrid Case Analysis The Madrid train bombing occurred during the morning of March 11, 2004, significantly occurring close to the general elections. The deadly attack took the lives of 191 people and wounded 1,800. The explosives were placed on commuter trains during the busy day of rush hour. The attack was speculated to have been the doings of the Basque separatist organization, known as the ETA due to their violent past. The ETA was known for a thirty year long violence strike, claiming the lives of an estimated 800 people. The blame ETA received came from all sides of the fence, "Angel Acebes, the country's interior minister, claimed, "There is no doubt ETA is responsible." In an outpouring of grief and defiance, the following day an estimated 11 million Spaniards, including some 2.3 million in Madrid alone, participated in demonstrations against the violence and in support of the victims." Although later investigation revealed the al-Qaeda's involvement, the people of Madrid wanted answers to the heinous crime that claimed so many lives.

The bombs used the morning of March 11, 2004 were timed to go off simultaneously right after one another, in order to cause extreme damage and confusion to passengers and police. The first bomb was recorded to have gone off around 7:40am; the timing is significant due to the fact that this was the time when children and parents were headed to school and work. The incident came at a time when no one would expect, people were focused on their everyday lives as well as the upcoming elections on March 14. The nature of the incident made it difficult for police and ambulance to fully assess the situation, due to the fact that it was happening on a train system in the height of rush hour. The fourth train was nearly 800 meters from the Atocha Station when it was reported that four bombs...

The bomb squad teams acted quickly to deactivate the remaining bombs on the trains to eliminate the possibility of more explosives.
Looking further into the case of the train bombings there were even more signs about the occurrence that were never followed up by officials. Police were informed by members involved with the mafia group that a bombing was to occur. Instead of taking the matter seriously only some of the information was followed up by the police, which angered the people of Madrid. It was also found that although there was extensive surveillance following the Islamic extremist group, the attack still occurred. The morning of the bombings, masked men were seen continuously entering and leaving the trains, which had many questioning whether some officers were involved. The security around the train station was nonexistent on this morning, leaving the train system an open target for such an attack. Had these incidences been taken seriously, many more lives could have been saved during the process.

Medical personnel had to overcome the hurdles of four separate accident sights with numerous victims needing urgent medical attention. Realizing the timeframe they had to saves lives, respondents worked quickly to establish a mobile hospital near the train station to administer medical care. Considering the magnitude of the incident medical personnel had not been subjected situations involving mass medical attention and lack of hospital resources. A standard procedure had not been put into place, so orders were being thrown left and right causing great confusion. Similar to the lack of communication in the 9/11 attacks, the Emergency respondents in different vicinities were not able to communication across frequencies with…