Malcolm Fairley Case Case Study

PAGES
2
WORDS
773
Cite
Related Topics:

Malcolm Fairley Beginning in April 1984, Malcolm Fairley would burglarize, sexually assault, and rape a number of victims and was becoming bolder with each assault. The braver he become, the more careless and easily startled he was, which would lead to his apprehension in September 1984. Using paint flake analysis, coupled with eyewitness testimony, law enforcement officials were able to track down Fairley and bring him to justice. During the course of subsequent investigation, they found evidence to connect him to various assaults and burglaries, including a facemask made out of a pair of trousers.

During the summer of 1984, the British countryside would be rocked by a series of burglaries, assaults, and rapes committed by an unknown assailant who would become known as "The Fox." "The Fox" prowled the countryside beginning in April when he committed his first burglary until September, when he was identified as Malcolm Fairley and was apprehended by authorities. While paint chip analysis would lead authorities to Fairley, the trail of evidence left behind at multiple crime scenes, and a multitude of eyewitness testimony, would ensure that Fairley was brought to justice.

...

After this first burglary, Fairley's criminal activities would begin to escalate and he became bolder in his attacks. During one of his burglaries in Tring, Fairley would steal a shotgun and ammunition that he would later use in the commission of future crimes (Malcolm Fairley -- The Hunt for the Fox, 2013). This would not be the only time that items stolen from a victim would be found or used at a subsequent attack. After burgling the home in Tring, Fairley broke into a home at Heath and Ranch. In this assault, Fairley attacked the couple while wearing a mask that had been fashioned out of a trouser leg and accidentally shot the man in the hand, which curbed his attacks for about a month (Malcolm Fairley -- The Hunt for the Fox, 2013). After this burglary and accidental shooting, Fairley's assaults became more violent, especially towards the women he encountered and eventually resulted in raping women on at least two separate occasions. It would be the assault committed on August 19, 1984…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

August 17, 1984: A serial rapist strikes in England. (2013). This Day In History. History Channel Online. Retrieved 31 July 2013, from http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/a-serial-rapist-strikes-in-england

Malcolm Fairley -- The Hunt for the Fox (2013). Watford Observer. Accessed 31 July

2013, from http://www.watfordobserver.co.uk/nostalgia/crimelibrary/malcolmfairley/

Norfolk, G. Payne-James, J. Squires, T. Wyatt, Jonathon (2011). Case Study: Malcolm
Fairley. Forensic Science Central. Accessed 31 July 2013, from http://forensicsciencecentral.co.uk/malcolmfairley.shtml


Cite this Document:

"Malcolm Fairley Case" (2013, July 31) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/malcolm-fairley-case-93853

"Malcolm Fairley Case" 31 July 2013. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/malcolm-fairley-case-93853>

"Malcolm Fairley Case", 31 July 2013, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/malcolm-fairley-case-93853

Related Documents

Eyewitness Testimony The Supreme Court, in Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 93 S. Ct. 375 (1972), set out some guidelines as to what a court must consider when it is trying to determine how much credibility to give to eyewitness testimony. This case involved a woman who identified a man who she claimed had raped her. The case revolved around the credibility of her identification. The Court laid out the

41+). Loftus notes that science has found "post-event information" is integrated into what most people have actually experienced because, "when people experience some actual event -- say a crime or an accident -- they often later acquire new information about the event. This new information can contaminate the memory" (Loftus, 2002, March, p. 41+). In addition, many false memories are created, deliberately or by accident, in response to leading questioning

Eyewitness Testimony Current Event in Criminal Justice The Reliability of Eyewitness Testimony The execution of Troy Anthony Davis on September 27, 2011, in Georgia has stirred new debate over the reliability of eyewitness testimony. Davis was convicted of the August 19, 1989 murder of police officer Mark MacPhail in Savannah, Georgia. Working a security guard at a Burger King, MacPhail was shot when he attempted to defend a man being assaulted in a

Thus while an interviewer may simply be trying to pin down additional details of an incident (for example), the eyewitness may believe that she or he is being challenged about the accuracy of his or her memory and statement and begin (again, most likely unconsciously and not in any attempt to commit perjury) to shift answers to coincide with what the witness believes the interviewer want to hear (Poole

Eyewitness Testimony and Memory Issues When investigating and prosecuting crimes and other incidents, their can be a heavy level of reliance on eyewitness testimony to substantiate the facts that are suggested by other evidence and to fill in missing gaps in the story of the crime, accident, or other incident. This can be a problem, however, as two different eyewitness accounts of the same incident are likely to differ significantly

Law enforcement has a direct ethical responsibility to preventing wrongful convictions, no matter how heavy the pressure for a conviction may be from a political standpoint. Wrongful convictions represent a miscarriage of justice and draw attention to procedural problems in law enforcement. One of the problems that has been shown to lead to wrongful convictions is the method by which eyewitness testimony is secured. Recent criminal justice policy and procedure