Personal freedom and the right to same-sex marriage

Marriage of Homosexuals

Homosexual Marriage

The practice of homosexuality might be perceived as offensive to some; others might view this act as a violation of their culture and of their religious preferences. Still others view homosexuality as a threat to the institution of a traditional marriage. While the objection to homosexuality and homosexual marriage might range in its content, the one thing should be considered is the level of freedom that individuals are allotted to make their own decisions. If two people have certain personal preferences that do not physically harm anyone else then what kind of control should be exerted over their own personal decisions? Does the majority or lawmakers have the right to infringe on personal freedoms just because they don't agree with personal choices? I argue that the state has no right whatsoever to deny freedoms to this class of individuals simply on the basis that it is not does not agree with their personal preferences. Furthermore, if such a bias is upheld and allowed to continue then it would undoubtedly and eventually infringe upon all of our rights. We would be left with a rather narrow range of choices in which we would be able to choose the way in which we live our lives; furthermore such a limited range of choices should not exist in a free society.

II. Body

A. Supporting Evidence

There are several different possibilities of sexual preference that are genetic composition allows for humans. Some heterosexuals are known as bi-curious since they fantasize or are commonly attracted to members of the same sex; while others are homosexual and fantasize about members of the opposite sex. The genetic composition of an individual does not seem to dictate their sexual orientation however it does seem to provide instances of predisposition to such behaviors, allowing for a range of behaviors which could be skewed to include homosexuality (Abbott, 2011). Furthermore scientists have found similar behaviors among several other species. Thus to say that homosexuality was unnatural would be a stretch of the imagination by any means.

B. Supporting Evidence

There may also be evidence that homosexuality is either completely or at least partially supported or empowered by cultural preferences (Carlos, 2010). Different cultures have different preferences toward gender roles in regards to sexuality. Therefore there may be a cultural component to homosexuality. Given the evidence of a genetic predisposing, this can also be coupled with the fact that culture plays a role, this serves as legitimate evidence that the development of homosexuality isn't as simple as someone making a personal choice. The scale of the decision is undoubtedly beyond conscious decision for many individuals.

Conclusion

Many people are disgusted by the prevalence of homosexuality. I must admit that I am rather reluctant to accept the practice. However, at the same time, I recognize the fact that if you start regulating other people's personal preferences, no matter how offensive they are to you, then you are opening a door to what will only be followed by a slippery slope. Beyond the individual judgment of whether something is right or wrong, exists a social fabric that must not be broken if our society is to provide an atmosphere that is conducive to freedom. Those in power must not be allowed to decide to regulate behaviors based on personal preferences. Thus, even though I am not exactly comfortable with same sex marriage myself, I recognize the fact the individuals should have the right to choose for themselves what their preferences are. If not, then what is next? Maybe Catholics will say that Baptists are not morally permissible. Or maybe the government will decide that no socialist should be allowed citizenship in a democratic society. The possibilities are limitless but there is one thing is for certain, people should have the right to make decisions on their own behalf; that's what freedom really means.