Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Religion and the Critique of Political Economy
The 19th century philosopher Karl Marx was considered so revolutionary because it offered a unique view of history and reinterpretation of the Hegelian dialectic. Marx stressed that worker's growing alienation from the means of production was producing a form of wage slavery that only benefited a narrow segment of society in the form of the bourgeoisie. The laborer no longer owns what he or she produces: under capitalism, the factory owner owns the fruits of that labor by virtue of owning property. The laborer not only produces commodities but becomes in and of himself a commodity. The more labor the worker produces, the cheaper he becomes as a commodity because of the wear and tear upon the worker's physical equipment, i.e. The worker's own body. The capitalist profits more while the worker profits less.
"Theology explains the problem of evil from the fall of man" (Marx 1844: 71). The Hegelian dialectic suggests that everything can be explained by a dialectical relationship between the haves and have-nots of society: i.e., in modern capitalism between the inequities between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. Religion, however,...
Marx offers a solution which denies this theological interpretation, and demands an end to history and a creation of a more just society in the form of communism and common ownership of the means of production.
There is also a parallel between capitalism and religion in Marxist thought. The more the laborer invests into the material products he creates, the less he is as a person: he has less time to himself, he enriches the capitalist (versus his own interests), and the more he suffers physically. Similarly, the more someone invests in religion, the less time the believer has to change the world in the here and now. "The more man puts into God, the less he retains in himself" says Marx (Marx 1844: 72). There is also a parallel between religion and the effectively forced labor of capitalist wage slavery: "Just as religion is a spontaneous act of the human imagination, of the human brain and human heart, operates independently of the individual -- that is, operates upon him as an alien, divine, or diabolical activity --…
References
Marx, K. (1844). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844, 66-81.
" (Capital, p. 915) Ecological damage is grounded in resource depletion and density of population. You can have 10,000 over a 1000 acre land and this might not hurt the ecological balance but when you have the same number of people on 10 acre land, the balance is seriously disturbed as water, minerals, and other resources of a very small area are constantly being used up. This is what happened during
All of Marx's ideas are based upon his value labor theory and surplus value concept in capitalism as the driving exploitation (McLellan, 2007, p.235). Application of Marxism critique on Buddhism Marxism on materialism is one Marxism aspect which is considered to be conflicting with Buddha-Dhamma. Buddha denounces materials while Marx proclaims it and Buddhism is considered non-materialist doctrine. Materialism that Marx means is not the one with physical, physiological or mechanical
Marx's Evolving Theory Of Exploitation As the author of the definitive Communist Manifesto, Marx was arguably one of the most influential of 19th century economists, and certainly one of the most influential of the revolutionaries of the era. Because of the overwhelming influence which he had on the political and philosophical history of the world, it is understandable that he has a great and even fundamentalist following. However, there remains a
Marx cries out that in Capitalism, "That culture... is, for the enormous majority, a mere training to act as a machine." It is this exploitation which persists today and which is far worse than the mere depression of living standards. Capitalism is intrinsically linked with consumerism, and both replace a sacred connection to one's vocation and one's art with a profane connection to one's paycheck and the throw-away products
The author of "History or Teleology? Marx vs. Weber" reviews common scholastic viewpoints regarding Marx and Weber. Weber is often lauded for his multifaceted and multidisciplinary explanation of human history. Unlike Marx, Weber addressed a multitude of variables that affect sociological realities. Yet the author notes that Weber can be criticized for his own brand of determinism and fatalism and also for his theoretical biases. Central to both Marx and Weber's
Voice, however, is usually political and confrontational. In communist societies, it is impossible to get all people to conform to an ideal without using some type of force. People view freedom as the ability to do what they want with their time and control their resources. If the state forces you to work only for its benefit and the benefit of the community, individual freedom will always be limited. This